BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter ablation (CCB) is an effective method of treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but in patients with heart failure (HF) the role of CCB remains unknown. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of CCB in patients with HF and cardiac im-plantable electronic devices (CIEDs), the impact of the procedure on symptoms, and echocardiographic parameters. METHODS: Thirty consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and CIED, referred for CCB of AF, were included. Procedural parameters were compared to a group of 59 consecutive patients without cardiac diseases referred for CCB (control group). RESULTS: The number of veins ablated per patient was smaller and application was performed less frequently in the right inferior pulmonary vein in the HF group compared with the control group (66.7% vs. 88.1%; p = 0.01, respectively). In two (6.7%) patients from the HF group and in five (8.5%) from the control group procedure-related complications occurred (p = 0.76). After six months 21 HF patients (70%), after one year 13 (43%), and after 625 days only three (10%) were free from arrhythmia. AF burden was significantly reduced after six months compared to the pre-ablation period (18.5% vs. 52.9%; p = 0.001). New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classes were both significantly (p < 0.001) reduced and LVEF was higher after six months in the HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and feasibility of CCB for AF in HF patients with CIED are comparable to subjects with structurally nor-mal heart; however, stable positioning of the balloon in the right inferior pulmonary vein may be more challenging. Although late recurrences are common, ablation reduces arrhythmia burden and leads to a long-term improvement of symptoms and echocardiographic indices.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter ablation (CCB) is an effective method of treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but in patients with heart failure (HF) the role of CCB remains unknown. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of CCB in patients with HF and cardiac im-plantable electronic devices (CIEDs), the impact of the procedure on symptoms, and echocardiographic parameters. METHODS: Thirty consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and CIED, referred for CCB of AF, were included. Procedural parameters were compared to a group of 59 consecutive patients without cardiac diseases referred for CCB (control group). RESULTS: The number of veins ablated per patient was smaller and application was performed less frequently in the right inferior pulmonary vein in the HF group compared with the control group (66.7% vs. 88.1%; p = 0.01, respectively). In two (6.7%) patients from the HF group and in five (8.5%) from the control group procedure-related complications occurred (p = 0.76). After six months 21 HF patients (70%), after one year 13 (43%), and after 625 days only three (10%) were free from arrhythmia. AF burden was significantly reduced after six months compared to the pre-ablation period (18.5% vs. 52.9%; p = 0.001). New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classes were both significantly (p < 0.001) reduced and LVEF was higher after six months in the HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and feasibility of CCB for AF in HF patients with CIED are comparable to subjects with structurally nor-mal heart; however, stable positioning of the balloon in the right inferior pulmonary vein may be more challenging. Although late recurrences are common, ablation reduces arrhythmia burden and leads to a long-term improvement of symptoms and echocardiographic indices.
Authors: Krzysztof Myrda; Piotr Buchta; Aleksandra Błachut; Michał Skrzypek; Mariusz Gąsior Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 2.430