Literature DB >> 29527786

How did I not see that? Perspectives of nonconsumer mental health researchers on the benefits of collaborative research with consumers.

Brenda Happell1, Sarah Gordon2, Julia Bocking1, Pete Ellis2, Cath Roper3, Jackie Liggins4, Chris Platania-Phung1, Brett Scholz1.   

Abstract

Coproduction of research between consumers of mental health services and nonconsumer mental health researchers is increasing. There is some research available describing consumer perspectives of this experience. However, there is a notable lack of research on other (nonconsumer) researcher experiences of and views about consumer involvement in coproduced research. A qualitative exploratory study was undertaken to examine perspectives of mental health researchers about consumer involvement in research. In-depth individual interviews were undertaken with 11 nonconsumer mental health researchers in Australia and New Zealand. Interview transcripts were analysed to identify major themes. There were three interacting themes: the salience of experiential difference, expanded learning, and enhanced research. The dynamic between different perspectives and learning had the effect of enhancing research across the spectrum of study phases and in ensuring research was of value to different groups. The findings emphasize the important contribution consumer researchers can make to mental health research by bringing their unique perspective and enhancing an environment of mutual learning. Findings also point to the need for foregrounding the numerous benefits of joint research between consumer and other researchers to enhance and improve clinical practice and the development of policy.
© 2018 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Keywords:  benefits; consumer participation; coproduction; mental health; research

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29527786     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  5 in total

1.  Development of a Lived Experience-Based Digital Resource for a Digitally-Assisted Peer Support Program for Young People Experiencing Psychosis.

Authors:  Claire E Peck; Michelle H Lim; Melanie Purkiss; Fiona Foley; Liza Hopkins; Neil Thomas
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Facing the Ethical Challenges: Consumer Involvement in COVID-19 Pandemic Research.

Authors:  N Straiton; A McKenzie; J Bowden; A Nichol; R Murphy; T Snelling; J Zalcberg; J Clements; J Stubbs; A Economides; D Kent; J Ansell; T Symons
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.

Authors:  Anne McKenzie; Janelle Bowden; John R Zalcberg; Karena Conroy; Julia Fallon-Ferguson; Shilpanjali Jesudason; James Ansell; Ania Anderst; Nicola Straiton
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-02-05

4.  Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Jim Elliott; Derek Stewart; Roger Wilson
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-06-14

5.  A collaboration between service users and professionals for the development and evaluation of a new program for cardiovascular risk management in persons with a diagnosis of severe mental illness: French multicenter qualitative and feasibility studies.

Authors:  Antoine Baleige; Jean-François Besnard; Nicolas Meunier-Beillard; Vincent Demassiet; Alain Monnier; Amel Ouezini; Olivier Lambert; Claire Charrel; Olivier Mazas; Joël Oberlin; Jean-Luc Roelandt; Frédéric Denis
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2019-12-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.