Literature DB >> 29527660

Impact of socioeconomic status on survival for patients with anal cancer.

Daniel Lin1, Heather T Gold1,2, David Schreiber3, Lawrence P Leichman4, Scott E Sherman5, Daniel J Becker1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) have improved, the gains in benefit may not be shared uniformly among patients of disparate socioeconomic status. In the current study, the authors investigated whether area-based median household income (MHI) is predictive of survival among patients with SCCA.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with SCCA from 2004 through 2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry were included. Socioeconomic status was defined by census-tract MHI level and divided into quintiles. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression were used to study predictors of survival and radiotherapy receipt.
RESULTS: A total of 9550 cases of SCCA were included. The median age of the patients was 58 years, 63% were female, 85% were white, and 38% were married. In multivariable analyses, patients living in areas with lower MHI were found to have worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with those in the highest income areas. Mortality hazard ratios for lowest to highest income were 1.32 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18-1.49), 1.31 (95% CI, 1.16-1.48), 1.19 (95% CI, 1.06-1.34), and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03-1.30). The hazard ratios for CSS similarly ranged from 1.34 to 1.22 for lowest to highest income. Older age, black race, male sex, unmarried marital status, an earlier year of diagnosis, higher tumor grade, and later American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease also were associated with worse CSS. Income was not found to be associated with the odds of initiating radiotherapy in multivariable analysis (odds ratio of 0.87 for lowest to highest income level; 95% CI, 0.63-1.20).
CONCLUSIONS: MHI appears to independently predict CSS and overall survival in patients with SCCA. Black race was found to remain a predictor of SCCA survival despite controlling for income. Further study is needed to understand the mechanisms by which socioeconomic inequalities affect cancer care and outcomes. Cancer 2018;124:1791-7.
© 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anal cancer; disparities; health services research; income; socioeconomic status; survival outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29527660     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pooled Analysis of external-beam RADiotherapy parameters in phase II and phase III trials in radiochemotherapy in Anal Cancer (PARADAC).

Authors:  Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Oscar Matzinger; Karin Haustermans; Didier Peiffert; Robert Glynne-Jones; Kathryn A Winter; Andre A Konski; Jaffer A Ajani; Jean-François Bosset; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi; Marc Puyraveau; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Helen Meadows; John Northover; Laurence Collette; Melissa Christiaens; Philippe Maingon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Factors Impacting Differential Outcomes in the Definitive Radiation Treatment of Anal Cancer Between HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Patients.

Authors:  Matthew Susko; Chia-Ching Jackie Wang; Ann A Lazar; Stephanie Kim; Angela Laffan; Mary Feng; Andrew Ko; Alan P Venook; Chloe E Atreya; Katherine Van Loon; Mekhail Anwar
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Racial and gender disparities in the incidence of anal cancer: analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).

Authors:  Alejandro Cruz; Debbie Chen; Paul Hsu; Viraj Pandit; Pamela Omesiete; Priyanka Vij; Valentine Nfonsam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-02

4.  Anal cancer survival: a socioeconomic analysis.

Authors:  F Ali; A E Ghareeb; A Jha; H Van der Voet; D Garg; M Jha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.951

5.  Socioeconomic status and survival outcomes in elderly cancer patients: A national health insurance service-elderly sample cohort study.

Authors:  Bum-Sup Jang; Ji Hyun Chang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Prognosis of prostate cancer and bone metastasis pattern of patients: a SEER-based study and a local hospital based study from China.

Authors:  Dongyu Liu; Yue Kuai; Ruohui Zhu; Chenhe Zhou; Yiqing Tao; Weidong Han; Qixin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in timeliness of care and outcomes for anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Tessnim R Ahmad; Matthew Susko; Karla Lindquist; Mekhail Anwar
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Predisposing, Enabling, and Need-Related Factors Associated with Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intentions and Uptake Among Black and Hispanic Sexual and Gender Diverse Adults in the USA.

Authors:  Christopher W Wheldon; Lisa A Eaton; Ryan J Watson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  Patterns of distant metastases in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jianxin Xue; Wensun Chen; Wenbo Xu; Zicheng Xu; Xiao Li; Feng Qi; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  The effect of marital and insurance status on the survival of elderly patients with stage M1b colon cancer: a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Chenghui Zhou; Yiwei Zhang; Xi Hu; Min Fang; Shuai Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.