Literature DB >> 29527571

Comparative Study of Multicellular Tumor Spheroid Formation Methods and Implications for Drug Screening.

Maria F Gencoglu1, Lauren E Barney1, Christopher L Hall1, Elizabeth A Brooks1, Alyssa D Schwartz1, Daniel C Corbett2, Kelly R Stevens2, Shelly R Peyton1.   

Abstract

Improved in vitro models are needed to better understand cancer progression and bridge the gap between in vitro proof-of-concept studies, in vivo validation, and clinical application. Multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) are a popular method for three-dimensional (3D) cell culture, because they capture some aspects of the dimensionality, cell-cell contact, and cell-matrix interactions seen in vivo. Many approaches exist to create MCTS from cell lines, and they have been used to study tumor cell invasion, growth, and how cells respond to drugs in physiologically relevant 3D microenvironments. However, there are several discrepancies in the observations made of cell behaviors when comparing between MCTS formation methods. To resolve these inconsistencies, we created and compared the behavior of breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer cells across three MCTS formation methods: in polyNIPAAM gels, in microwells, or in suspension culture. These methods formed MCTS via proliferation from single cells or passive aggregation, and therefore showed differential reliance on genes important for cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions. We also found that the MCTS formation method dictated drug sensitivity, where MCTS formed over longer periods of time via clonal growth were more resistant to treatment. Toward clinical application, we compared an ovarian cancer cell line MCTS formed in polyNIPAAM with cells from patient-derived malignant ascites. The method that relied on clonal growth (PolyNIPAAM gel) was more time and cost intensive, but yielded MCTS that were uniformly spherical, and exhibited the most reproducible drug responses. Conversely, MCTS methods that relied on aggregation were faster, but yielded MCTS with grapelike, lobular structures. These three MCTS formation methods differed in culture time requirements and complexity, and had distinct drug response profiles, suggesting the choice of MCTS formation method should be carefully chosen based on the application required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; breast cancer; mafosfamide; ovarian cancer; polyNIPAAM; prostate cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 29527571      PMCID: PMC5843470          DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  70 in total

1.  3D tumour models: novel in vitro approaches to cancer studies.

Authors:  Agata Nyga; Umber Cheema; Marilena Loizidou
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Silviya P Zustiak; Jennie B Leach
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 3.  Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research.

Authors:  Ruei-Zeng Lin; Ruei-Zhen Lin; Hwan-You Chang
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Three-dimensional spheroid model in tumor biology.

Authors:  M T Santini; G Rainaldi
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The use of 3-D cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model.

Authors:  Leoni A Kunz-Schughart; James P Freyer; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Reinhard Ebner
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2004-06

6.  Screening for supra-additive effects of cytotoxic drugs and gamma irradiation in an in vitro model for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  B Lambert; L De Ridder; G Slegers; V De Gelder; R A Dierckx; H Thierens
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Apoptosis-based evaluation of chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Maryann B Flick; David O'Malley; Thomas Rutherford; Sofya Rodov; Marijka Kamsteeg; Xiao-Ying Hao; Peter Schwartz; Barry M Kacinski; Gil Mor
Journal:  J Soc Gynecol Investig       Date:  2004-05

Review 8.  Experimental anti-tumor therapy in 3-D: spheroids--old hat or new challenge?

Authors:  Juergen Friedrich; Reinhard Ebner; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Multicellular tumor spheroid model to evaluate spatio-temporal dynamics effect of chemotherapeutics: application to the gemcitabine/CHK1 inhibitor combination in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Isabelle Dufau; Céline Frongia; Flavie Sicard; Laure Dedieu; Pierre Cordelier; Frédéric Ausseil; Bernard Ducommun; Annie Valette
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Getting to know ovarian cancer ascites: opportunities for targeted therapy-based translational research.

Authors:  Nuzhat Ahmed; Kaye L Stenvers
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  23 in total

1.  Editorial: Special Issue on Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials Approaches to Tumor Modeling.

Authors:  Claudia Fischbach; Michaela Reagan
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-02-12

2.  OrgDyn: feature- and model-based characterization of spatial and temporal organoid dynamics.

Authors:  Zaki Hasnain; Andrew K Fraser; Dan Georgess; Alex Choi; Paul Macklin; Joel S Bader; Shelly R Peyton; Andrew J Ewald; Paul K Newton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Designer hydrogels: Shedding light on the physical chemistry of the pancreatic cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Chien-Chi Lin; Murray Korc
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Applicability of drug response metrics for cancer studies using biomaterials.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Brooks; Sualyneth Galarza; Maria F Gencoglu; R Chase Cornelison; Jennifer M Munson; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Processing and Analysis of Ascites.

Authors:  Hannah M Micek; Molly J Carroll; Lisa Barroilhet; Pamela K Kreeger
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Design of synthetic extracellular matrices for probing breast cancer cell growth using robust cyctocompatible nucleophilic thiol-yne addition chemistry.

Authors:  Laura J Macdougall; Katherine L Wiley; April M Kloxin; Andrew P Dove
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Control of thiol-maleimide reaction kinetics in PEG hydrogel networks.

Authors:  Lauren E Jansen; Lenny J Negrón-Piñeiro; Sualyneth Galarza; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  The importance of scoring recognition fitness in spheroid morphological analysis for robust label-free quality evaluation.

Authors:  Kazuhide Shirai; Hirohito Kato; Yuta Imai; Mayu Shibuta; Kei Kanie; Ryuji Kato
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.419

9.  Generation of uniform-sized multicellular tumor spheroids using hydrogel microwells for advanced drug screening.

Authors:  Jong Min Lee; Da Yeon Park; Letao Yang; Eun-Joong Kim; Christian D Ahrberg; Ki-Bum Lee; Bong Geun Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Preparation and characterization of size-controlled glioma spheroids using agarose hydrogel microwells.

Authors:  Fereshtehsadat Mirab; You Jung Kang; Sheereen Majd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.