| Literature DB >> 29527434 |
Błażej Scheibe1, Radosław Mrówczyński1, Natalia Michalak2, Karol Załęski1, Michał Matczak2, Mateusz Kempiński1,3, Zuzanna Pietralik3, Mikołaj Lewandowski1, Stefan Jurga1, Feliks Stobiecki1,2.
Abstract
Reduced graphene oxide-Entities:
Keywords: Fe3O4 nanoparticles; aerogel; composite; polydopamine; reduced graphene oxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 29527434 PMCID: PMC5827803 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.9.55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1SEM micrographs of rGO (a,d), rGO-Fe3O4 (b,e) and rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 (c,f) aerogel structures.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogel (a,b) and TEM micrographs of Fe3O4 (c) and PDA@Fe3O4 nanoparticles (d).
Figure 3Raman spectra of rGO, rGO-Fe3O4 and rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogel samples: λ = 488 nm (a), 514 nm (b), 633 nm (c) and 785 nm (d).
Figure 4ID/IG ratios (a), mean defect distance (LD) (b) and FWHM (c) calculated from Raman spectra of rGO, rGO-Fe3O4 and rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogel samples.
Figure 5FTIR absorption (a) and XPS survey (b) spectra of rGO, rGO-Fe3O4 and rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogel samples.
Figure 6XPS C 1s, O 1s, N 1s and Fe 2p spectra of rGO, rGO-Fe3O4 and rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogel samples. The intensity scales are the same for respective elements (in order to allow for direct comparison).
Figure 7Room temperature M–H curves of rGO-Fe3O4, rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 and c-rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogels (a). The inset in (a) presents M–H curves at low magnetic field. ZFC and FC temperature dependences of susceptibility for rGO, rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 and c-rGO-PDA@Fe3O4 aerogels under the applied field of 100 Oe are shown in (b).