Literature DB >> 29527423

Tailored Explanation: A Strategy to Minimize Nonresponse in Demographic Items Among Low-income Racial and Ethnic Minorities.

Maichou Lor1, Barbara J Bowers1, Anna Krupp1, Nora Jacobson1.   

Abstract

There is a high rate of nonresponse for demographic items in survey research, particularly for racial and ethnic minority respondents. This present study examined whether providing an explanation to racial and ethnic minority respondents prior to asking a set of demographic questions would increase respondents' motivation to reduce nonresponse to gender, income, age, and race items. Using a cross-sectional, randomized comparison design, 99 respondents were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 did not receive an explanation for asking the demographic questions. Group 2 received an explanation designed to be relevant and meaningful to them concerning the significance and potential use of demographic information for racial and ethnic minority populations. A proportional difference test was used to calculate the differences in the proportion of respondents' motivation to complete demographic survey items between the groups. A proportional difference effect size (Cohen's h effect size) was used to determine the magnitude of difference between the two groups. Over 50% of respondents were African Americans. While none of the item non-responses for both groups is statistically significant in terms of proportional differences, there is small (Cohen's h= 0.184) to moderate (Cohen's h=0.342) effect in reducing demographic item non-response when an explanation was provided to respondents. Specifically, adding an explanation made the biggest improvement in reporting income. The study findings support the importance of providing participants with an explanation that is relevant and meaningful to increase motivation and thereby minimize item nonresponse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  item nonresponse; motivation; tailored explanation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29527423      PMCID: PMC5844486          DOI: 10.29115/SP-2017-0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Pract


  3 in total

Review 1.  Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants.

Authors:  Antronette K Yancey; Alexander N Ortega; Shiriki K Kumanyika
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Planning for Ancillary Care Provision: Lessons From the Developing World.

Authors:  Nora Jacobson; Anna Krupp; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  A Case Study of Engaging Hard-to-Reach Participants in the Research Process: Community Advisors on Research Design and Strategies (CARDS)®.

Authors:  Betty L Kaiser; Gay R Thomas; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.228

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Why Patients with Chronic Disease Keep Silent? Analysis of Item Nonresponse in Rural China.

Authors:  Yiqing Mao; Zhanchun Feng; Shangfeng Tang; Tailai Wu; Ruoxi Wang; Da Feng; Xiaoyu Chen
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.429

2.  Self-reported vs RUCA rural-urban classification among North Carolina pharmacists.

Authors:  Micah E Castle; Casey R Tak
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-08-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.