| Literature DB >> 29527201 |
Faiza H Waghu1, Shaini Joseph1, Sanket Ghawali1, Elvis A Martis2, Taruna Madan3, Kareenhalli V Venkatesh4, Susan Idicula-Thomas1.
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are gaining attention as substitutes for antibiotics in order to combat the risk posed by multi-drug resistant pathogens. Several research groups are engaged in design of potent anti-infective agents using natural AMPs as templates. In this study, a library of peptides with high sequence similarity to Myeloid Antimicrobial Peptide (MAP) family were screened using popular online prediction algorithms. These peptide variants were designed in a manner to retain the conserved residues within the MAP family. The prediction algorithms were found to effectively classify peptides based on their antimicrobial nature. In order to improve the activity of the identified peptides, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, using bilayer and micellar systems could be used to design and predict effect of residue substitution on membranes of microbial and mammalian cells. The inference from MD simulation studies well corroborated with the wet-lab observations indicating that MD-guided rational design could lead to discovery of potent AMPs. The effect of the residue substitution on membrane activity was studied in greater detail using killing kinetic analysis. Killing kinetics studies on Gram-positive, negative and human erythrocytes indicated that a single residue change has a drastic effect on the potency of AMPs. An interesting outcome was a switch from monophasic to biphasic death rate constant of Staphylococcus aureus due to a single residue mutation in the peptide.Entities:
Keywords: MD simulation; antibacterial peptides; killing kinetics; microbial membrane; rational design
Year: 2018 PMID: 29527201 PMCID: PMC5829097 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Sequence information of the designed peptides.
| P1 | VL | 69 | CAMPST23 (SMAP29) |
| P2 | CI | 63 | CAMPST23 (SMAP29) |
| P3 | VF | 81 | CAMPST23 (SMAP29) |
Identical residues amongst the 3 peptides are written in bold.
All the peptides are predicted to be antimicrobial by CAMP.
MIC (μM) of peptides.
| BMAP28 (1–18) | 3.125–6.25 | 3.125–6.25 | 3.125–6.25 | 25–50 |
| P1 | 6.25–12.5 | 6.25–12.5 | 50–100 | 50–100 |
| P2 | 12.5–25 | 50–100 | 50–100 | NA |
| P3 | 50–100 | NA | NA | NA |
| P1m | 3.125–6.25 | 3.125–6.25 | 6.25–12.5 | 25.50 |
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was the average range of values obtained from triplicates of three independent experiments.
50% inhibition, NA-inactive upto 100μM.
Figure 1Snapshots of 100 ns simulation of BMAP28(1-18) with POPC: POPG bilayer. The peptide is represented in cartoon format; lipid head groups are shown as balls; tails are shown as lines and lipid tails within 3 Å of the peptide are highlighted in purple.
Figure 2Time profile of the distance between the COMs of the peptides and (A) SDS (B) DPC during the full course of the simulation.
Figure 3CD spectra of peptides BMAP28(1–18), P1, and P1m in the presence of (A) 10 mM PB and (B) 25 mM SDS.
Calculated Hill parameters for three different membranes.
| BMAP28(1–18) | 2.5 | 1.4 | 3.07 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 61.4 |
| P1 | 1.2 | 3 | 1.02 | 26.6 | 1.55 | 170 |
| P1m | 4.5 | 2.2 | 2.13 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 14.2 |
Hill coefficient;
half saturation constant.
Figure 4Plot of % Inhibition of (A) S. aureus 25923 (B) E. coli 8739 (C) % Hemolysis (D) Death rate constant vs. the concentration of the peptide. Dotted lines represent the fitted values and symbols represent the observed values of the experiment.