| Literature DB >> 29526934 |
Shuichi Hagiwara1,2, Minoru Kaneko1, Makoto Aoki1,2, Masato Murata1,2, Yumi Ichikawa1,2, Jun Nakajima1,2, Yuta Isshiki1,2, Yusuke Sawada1,2, Jun'ichi Tamura2,3, Kiyohiro Oshima1,2.
Abstract
Objective Almost no Japanese elderly patients have an advance directive (AD). Our aim was to determine whether or not the wish to receive intensive care in elderly patients with respiratory tract infection could be predicted from the prehospital data. Methods In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients ≥65 years of age with respiratory tract infection who had been transferred to our hospital by ambulance between September 2014 and August 2016. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they wished to receive intensive treatment. We placed patients without a wish to receive intensive treatments (WITs) in Group A and patients with a WITs in Group B. We then analyzed parameters that could be determined in the prehospital phase and compared the findings between the groups. Results Thirty-seven patients were in Group A, and 67 patients were in Group B. None of the patients in this study had an AD. There were significant differences in the age, rate of residence in an extended care facility, frequency of inability to care for oneself fully, frequency of dementia, number of prescribed drugs, and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) on a univariate analysis. A logistic regression analysis showed that the inability to care for oneself fully [odds ratio (OR): 4.521, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.024-10.096, p<0.001] and a low GCS (OR 0.885, 95%CI 0.838-0.935, p<0.001) were related to a WITs. Conclusion Elderly patients who are unable to care for themselves and who have a low GCS in the prehospital stage are likely not to want intensive treatment.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; living will; respiratory tract infection
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29526934 PMCID: PMC6096014 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0155-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure.The study flow diagram.
Patients’ Characteristics.
| Group A (n=37) | Group B (n=67) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 83.9±8.1 | 80.2±7.3 | 0.011 |
| Male [n (%)] | 20 (54.1) | 39 (58.2) | 0.686 |
| Resident of a CF [n (%)] | 17 (45.8) | 17 (25.4) | <0.001 |
| Need care [n (%)] | 32 (86.5) | 27 (40.3) | <0.001 |
| With dementia [n (%)] | 29 (78.4) | 31 (46.3) | 0.002 |
| Hospitalization within 1 year [n (%)] | 13 (35.1) | 11 (16.4) | 0.05 |
| Previous illness [n (%)] | 19 (51.4) | 19 (28.4) | 0.033 |
| Addictive medicine (n) | 7.3±3.9 | 5.6±3.8 | 0.027 |
| mBP (mmHg) | 88.6±22.9 | 92.8±21.4 | 0.330 |
| Hart rate (min-1) | 100.3±24.7 | 98.0±22.2 | 0.964 |
| Respiratory rate (min-1) | 27.2±6.5 | 26.2±9.2 | 0.169 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 37.9±1.2 | 37.8±1.4 | 0.958 |
| GCS | 11.3±3.9 | 12.6±3.4 | 0.040 |
| SpO2(%) | 86.1±10.5 | 87.8±8.2 | 0.490 |
| qSOFA | 1.5±0.8 | 1.3±0.8 | 0.484 |
| SOFA | 4.4±1.8 | 4.0±2.7 | 0.054 |
| JAAM DIC score | 1.5±1.6 | 1.2±1.3 | 0.478 |
| Aspiration pneumonia [n (%)] | 18 (48.6) | 18 (26.9) | 0.032 |
| Decision maker: patient [n (%)] | 2 (5.4) | 24 (35.8) | <0.001 |
| Death [n (%)] | 6 (16.2) | 5 (7.5) | 0.193 |
Group A, did not have a wish to receive intensive treatment; Group B, wished to receive intensive treatment.
SD: standard deviation, CF: care facility, mBP: mean blood pressure, GCS: Glasgow coma scale, qSOFA: quick sequential organ failure assessment score, SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment score, JAAM DIC: Japanese association for acute medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation
Result of the Logistic Regression Analysis.
| Partial regression coefficient | p value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Need of care | 1.509 | <0.001 | 4.521 | 2.024 | 10.096 |
| GCS | -0.122 | <0.001 | 0.885 | 0.838 | 0.935 |
Model chi square test p<0.01, Hosmer-Lemeshow test p=0.296, Predictive accuracy 64.4%.
GCS: Glasgow coma scale