Literature DB >> 29525787

Intraoperative Inducibility of Atrial Fibrillation Does Not Predict Early Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.

Eva A H Lanters1, Christophe P Teuwen1, Ameeta Yaksh1, Charles Kik2, Lisette J M E van der Does1, Elisabeth M J P Mouws1,2, Paul Knops1, Nicole J van Groningen1, Thijmen Hokken1, Ad J J C Bogers2, Natasja M S de Groot3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative atrial fibrillation (EPoAF) is associated with thromboembolic events, prolonged hospitalization, and development of late PoAF (LPoAF). It is, however, unknown if EPoAF can be predicted by intraoperative AF inducibility. The aims of this study are therefore to explore (1) the value of intraoperative inducibility of AF for development of both EPoAF and LPoAF and (2) the predictive value of de novo EPoAF for recurrence of LPoAF. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (N=496, 75% male) undergoing cardiothoracic surgery for coronary and/or valvular heart disease were included. AF induction was attempted by atrial pacing, before extracorporeal circulation. All patients were on continuous rhythm monitoring until discharge to detect EPoAF. During a follow-up period of 2 years, LPoAF was detected by ECGs and Holter recordings. Sustained AF was inducible in 56% of patients. There was no difference in patients with or without AF before surgery (P=0.159), or between different types of surgery (P=0.687). In patients without a history of AF, incidence of EPoAF and LPoAF was 37% and 2%, respectively. EPoAF recurred in 58% patients with preoperative AF, 53% developed LPoAF. There were no correlations between intraoperative inducibility and EPoAF or LPoAF (P>0.05). EPoAF was not correlated with LPoAF in patients without a history of AF (P=0.116), in contrast to patients with AF before surgery (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative AF inducibility does not predict development of either EPoAF or LPoAF. In patients with AF before surgery, EPoAF is correlated with LPoAF recurrences. This correlation is absent in patients without AF before surgery.
© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; cardiac surgery; intraoperative induction; postoperative complication arrhythmia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29525787      PMCID: PMC5907553          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

Intraoperative atrial fibrillation inducibility does not predict development of early postoperative atrial fibrillation. In patients without a history of atrial fibrillation, early postoperative atrial fibrillation is not correlated with late recurrences of atrial fibrillation; hence, a more conservative approach with regard to initiation of oral anticoagulants may be justified in this subpopulation.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

In patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, early postoperative atrial fibrillation is correlated with late recurrences of atrial fibrillation; thus, these patients should be monitored closely for recurrences, before discontinuation of oral anticoagulants can even be considered.

Introduction

Over the past decades, cardiac surgery has become an established treatment modality for various cardiovascular diseases. However, despite improved surgical techniques and health care over the years, atrial fibrillation (AF) is still frequently observed in the early postoperative period. Reported incidences of early postoperative AF (EPoAF) range from 10% to 65%.1, 2, 3, 4 EPoAF is associated with thromboembolic complications and prolonged hospitalization.3, 5, 6 A previous study demonstrated, although in a small population (N=50) with coronary artery disease, that intraoperative inducibility of AF could be a predictor for development of EPoAF.7 However, this was never validated in a larger population with a variety of cardiovascular diseases. In addition, EPoAF is known to increase the risk of late postoperative AF (LPoAF),6, 8, 9 yet the predictive value of intraoperative inducibility was never investigated. The latest European guidelines advise to consider long‐term oral anticoagulants in cases of EPoAF as prevention for thromboembolic complications (Class IIa).10 However, they also concluded that additional research is mandatory to investigate the predictive value of short‐lasting (<24 hours) EPoAF episodes for development of LPoAF. Hence, there is a need to identify patients at risk for EPoAF and, subsequently, to determine whether these patients are also at risk for LPoAF. The aims of this study are therefore to explore (1) the value of intraoperative inducibility of AF for development of both EPoAF and LPoAF and (2) the predictive value of de novo EPoAF episodes of any duration >30 seconds for recurrence of LPoAF.

Methods

The data, analytic methods, and study materials will not be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure.

Study Population

The study population consisted of 496 adult patients, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, including isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated valvular heart surgery (VHS), a combination of VHS and CABG (VHS+CABG) or correction of a congenital heart defect (Figure 1). Patients with an atrial pacing device, previous ablation of atrial arrhythmias, or severe renal failure or patients requiring mechanical or inotropic support before the surgical procedure were not eligible for inclusion. Surgical pulmonary vein isolation was performed in a selection of patients with a history of AF. Classification of AF was performed according to the latest guidelines.10
Figure 1

Flowchart patient inclusion. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; LPoAF, late postoperative atrial fibrillation; VHD, valvular heart disease.

Flowchart patient inclusion. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; LPoAF, late postoperative atrial fibrillation; VHD, valvular heart disease. Patients were included in either the QUASAR11 (Quest for the Arrhythmogenic Substrate of Atrial Fibrillation) or HALT&REVERSE12 (HSF1 activators lower cardiomyocyte damage; towards a novel approach to reverse AF) project, which were both approved by the institutional medical ethical committee (MEC2010‐054 and MEC2014‐393). All patients provided written informed consent before inclusion. Clinical characteristics were obtained from electronic patient files.

Intraoperative Induction of AF by Electrical Stimulation

QUASAR and HALT&REVERSE are high‐resolution epicardial mapping studies, designed to investigate the arrhythmogenic substrate underlying AF. For this purpose, mapping is performed during either spontaneous or electrically induced AF. AF induction is attempted in every patient before commencement of extracorporeal circulation by fixed‐rate pacing at the right atrial appendage, delivered by a temporary pacemaker wire (pulse width: 2 ms, output 10 mA). Pacing started at a rate of 200 bpm, and if AF was not induced after 2 attempts, the rate was gradually increased by steps of 50 bpm. If AF was not induced at a pacing rate of 400 bpm or loss of capture occurred, attempts were terminated and AF was considered noninducible.13 Attempts for inducibility of AF were categorized as (1) noninducibility; (2) nonsustained AF (self‐terminating during mapping procedure); (3) nonsustained atrial flutter; (4) sustained AF (not self‐terminating during mapping procedure, ≈4 minutes); and (5) sustained atrial flutter.

Early Postoperative AF

Postoperative cardiac rhythms were continuously recorded during the first 4 to 5 days. Telemetry recordings, ECGs, and patient records were all manually evaluated for the presence of AF episodes. EPoAF was defined as irregular RR intervals in the absence of distinct P waves, with a duration of at least 30 seconds occurring within 14 days after the surgery.

Late Postoperative AF

For this subanalysis, we included only those patients who completed a 2‐year follow‐up period by March 2017 or developed AF within this period. LPoAF was detected on either ECGs or 24‐hour Holter recordings. If applicable, additional rhythm registrations obtained during the follow‐up period were requested from the referring hospital.

Statistical Analysis

All data were tested for normality. Continuous, normally distributed data are expressed as mean±SD and skewed data as median (P25–P75). Student t tests were used to compare normally distributed continuous clinical parameters. Non–normally distributed clinical parameters were compared by nonparametric tests including Mann‐Whitney U‐test. Fisher exact or χ2 tests were applied for categorical variables. The correlation among EPoAF, LPoAF, AF induction, and clinical characteristics was examined using Pearson or Spearman tests where applicable. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically relevant. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).

Results

The study population consisted of 496 patients (age 67±11 years, 373 [75%] male). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The majority of patients (N=273, 55%) underwent CABG surgery, whereas VHS, or VHS+CABG was performed in 122 (25%) and 82 (16%) patients, respectively. The remaining 19 (4%) patients underwent first‐time surgical correction of a congenital heart defect including mainly patients with either atrial or ventricular septal defects.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics

Total study populationNo AFAF P valuea
Population, N (%)496 (100)371 (75)125 (25)
Group, N (%)<0.001
CABG273 (55)246 (66)27 (22)
VHS122 (25)58 (16)64 (51)
VHS/CABG82 (16)56 (15)26 (21)
CHD19 (4)11 (3)8 (6)
Age (years), mean±SD67±1165±1171±9<0.001
Male sex, N (%)373 (75)289 (78)84 (67)0.017
Hypertension, N (%)276 (56)206 (56)70 (56)0.926
Diabetes mellitus, N (%)129 (26)102 (27)27 (22)0.194
Hyperlipidemia, N (%)162 (33)136 (37)26 (21)0.001
BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD27.7±4.327.8±4.227.7±4.50.935
Antiarrhythmic drugs,b N (%)367 (75)271 (73)96 (77)0.408
Class I2 (0.4)2 (1)0 (0)0.399
Class II367 (66)254 (68)75 (60)<0.001
Class III27 (5)5 (1)22 (18)<0.001
Class IV17 (3)13 (4)4 (3)0.801
Left ventricular function, N (%)0.059
Normal364 (73)282 (76)82 (66)0.023
Mild impairment96 (19)68 (18)28 (22)0.319
Moderate impairment34 (7)20 (51)14 (11)0.026
Severe impairment2 (1)1 (1)1 (1)0.418
Left atrial dilatation,c N (%)132 (27)66 (18)66 (53)<0.001
AF type before CS, N (%)
Paroxysmal AF54 (43.2)
Persistent AF47 (37.6)
Long‐standing persistent AF22 (17.6)
Permanent AF2 (1.6)
Surgical ablation80 (64)

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; and VHS, heart valve surgery.

Comparing No AF and AF.

Patients could use more than one type of AAD; therefore, the sum of all classes is not 100%.

Dimension >45 mm.

Baseline Characteristics AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; and VHS, heart valve surgery. Comparing No AF and AF. Patients could use more than one type of AAD; therefore, the sum of all classes is not 100%. Dimension >45 mm. A history of AF was present in 125 (25%) patients and was either paroxysmal (N=54, 43.2%), persistent (N=47, 37.6%), long‐standing persistent (N=22, 17.6%), or permanent (N=2, 1.6%). Eighty (64%) of these patients underwent concomitant surgical pulmonary vein isolation.

Intraoperative Inducibility of AF

At the start of the mapping procedure, spontaneous AF was present in 77 (15.5%) patients with a history of AF. In addition, 7 (1.4%) patients without a history of AF converted spontaneously to AF during surgery, before mapping. Pacing was not performed due to patient‐related or technical issues in another 11 (2.2%) patients. AF induction was attempted in all 401 remaining patients. As depicted in Figure 2A, sustained AF was successfully induced in 56% of these patients, whereas in 10% AF was nonsustained. Either sustained atrial flutter or nonsustained atrial flutter was induced in 6% and 7%, respectively. In 21% of patients, arrhythmias were not inducible despite adequate pacing attempts.
Figure 2

Intraoperative inducibility. Results of intraoperative inducibility of various atrial tachyarrhythmias for the total study population (A), for patients without or with AF before surgery (B) and per type of cardiac surgery (C). AF indicates atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; VHS, heart valve surgery.

Intraoperative inducibility. Results of intraoperative inducibility of various atrial tachyarrhythmias for the total study population (A), for patients without or with AF before surgery (B) and per type of cardiac surgery (C). AF indicates atrial fibrillation; AFL, atrial flutter; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; VHS, heart valve surgery. Figure 2B shows AF inducibility for patients without (N=357) and with preoperative (N=44) AF separately. Induction of sustained AF was equally successful in patients with preoperative AF (73%) and patients without (54%, P=0.159). Intraoperative inducibility per type of surgery is indicated in Figure 2C. There was no difference in AF inducibility between the various groups, P=0.687.

Early Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Overall, EPoAF developed in 211 (43%) patients, including 138 (37%) patients without and 73 (58%) patients with preoperative AF (P<0.001). Clinical characteristics of patients with and without EPoAF are depicted in Table 2. Most initial EPoAF episodes occurred at Day 3 (N=76, 36%) and Day 4 (N=53, 25%), as opposed to Day 1 (N=17, 8%), Day 2 (N=23, 11%), Day 5 (N=25, 12%), Day 6 (N=9, 4%), Day 7 (N=5, 2%), Day 8 (N=2, 1%), and Day 11 (N=1, 1%). Figure 3 shows the cumulative onset of EPoAF per postoperative day, for patients with (red bars) and without (green bars) preoperative AF separately. EPoAF developed earlier (P<0.001). in patients with AF before surgery (Day 3±2) before surgery, than in patients without (Day 4±1).
Table 2

Clinical Charateristics of Patients With and Without EPoAF

No AFAF
No EPoAF (N=233)EPoAF (N=138) P ValueNo EPoAF (N=52)EPoAF (N=73) P value
Group, N (%)0.0060.951
CABG160 (69)86 (62)10 (19)17 (23)
VHS38 (16)20 (15)27 (52)37 (51)
VHS/CABG25 (11)31 (22)12 (23)14 (19)
CHD10 (4)1 (<1)3 (6)5 (7)
Age (years), mean±SD63±1269±8<0.00168±1072±70.014
Sex (male, %)182 (78)107 (78)0.89733 (63)47 (64)0.427
Hypertension, N (%)128 (55)78 (57)0.76628 (54)42 (58)0.682
Diabetes mellitus, N (%)65 (28)37 (27)0.8217 (13)20 (28)0.062
Hyperlipidemia, N (%)87 (37)49 (36)0.72311 (21)15 (21)0.934
BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD28±427±40.55427±428±50.107
Antiarrhythmic drugs, N (%)0.0810.978
Class I1 (<1)1 (<1)00
Class II153 (66)101 (73)30 (58)45 (62)
Class III4 (2)1 (<1)11 (21)11 (15)
Class IV8 (3)5 (4)2 (4)2 (3)
Left ventricular function, N (%)0.1800.148
Normal185 (79)97 (70)38 (73)44 (60)
Mild impairment36 (15)32 (23)7 (13)21 (29)
Moderate impairment11 (5)9 (7)6 (12)8 (11)
Severe impairment1 (<1)01 (2)0
Left atrial dilatation, N (%)40 (17)26 (19)0.68421 (40)45 (62)0.019
AF type before CS, N (%)0.116
Paroxysmal AF26 (50)28 (38)
Persistent AF15 (29)32 (44)
Long‐standing Persistent AF11 (21)10 (14)
Permanent AF03 (4)
Surgical ablation, N (%)45 (87)35 (48)<0.001

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation; and VHS, valvular heart surgery.

Figure 3

Early postoperative AF. Cumulative proportion of EPoAF onset per postoperative day for patients without (green bars) or with (red bars) AF before surgery. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Clinical Charateristics of Patients With and Without EPoAF AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation; and VHS, valvular heart surgery. Early postoperative AF. Cumulative proportion of EPoAF onset per postoperative day for patients without (green bars) or with (red bars) AF before surgery. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation. In the subpopulation of 80 patients in whom surgical pulmonary vein isolation was performed, EPoAF developed in 44% (N=35), compared with the recurrence of EPoAF in 84% (N=38) of the patients in whom ablation was not performed (P<0.001). EPoAF terminated spontaneously in only 6 patients. Patients received Class II (N=113), Class III (N=68), and/or digoxin (N=45) as treatment for EPoAF. In 33 patients, EPoAF was treated by a combination of electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs. At discharge to the center of referral after 5 (5–7) days, AF was present in 55 (11%) patients, including 14 (4%) patients without preoperative AF and 41 (34%) patients with preoperative AF, despite failed attempts to restore sinus rhythm in 75% (N=42).

Relation With Intraoperative Inducibility

The upper panel of Figure 4 indicates the proportion of patients (N=357) that developed de novo EPoAF, for each type of induced arrhythmia separately. There was no correlation between the type of intraoperatively induced arrhythmia and development of EPoAF (P>0.05). Similar results were obtained for patients with preoperative AF (N=44) who developed EPoAF recurrences, as indicated in the lower panel of Figure 4 (P>0.05).
Figure 4

Relation between intraoperative inducibility and early postoperative AF. Proportion of patients who develop EPoAF (dashed) per type of arrhythmia induced, for patients without (upper panel) and with (lower panel) AF before surgery. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation; nsAF, non‐sustained atrial fibrillation; nsAFL, non‐sustained atrial flutter; sAFL, sustained atrial flutter.

Relation between intraoperative inducibility and early postoperative AF. Proportion of patients who develop EPoAF (dashed) per type of arrhythmia induced, for patients without (upper panel) and with (lower panel) AF before surgery. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; EPoAF, early postoperative atrial fibrillation; nsAF, non‐sustained atrial fibrillation; nsAFL, non‐sustained atrial flutter; sAFL, sustained atrial flutter. A total of 307 (62%) patients completed the 2‐year follow‐up period, and/or reached the study end point (LPoAF). Forty‐four patients (14%) developed LPoAF during follow‐up, including only 4 (2%) patients without preoperative AF. AF recurred in 40 (53%) patients with preoperative AF (P<0.001). As expected, the incidence of LPoAF recurrences was lower in patients who underwent ablation than in patients in whom ablation was not performed: 25% versus 44%, P=0.021. Table 3 shows additional clinical characteristics of patients with and without LPoAF.
Table 3

Clinical Charateristics of Patients With and Without LPoAF

No AFAF
No LPoAF (N=367)LPoAF (N=4) P ValueNo LPoAF (N=85)LPoAF (N=40) P value
Group, N (%)0.0100.498
CABG245 (67)1 (25)19 (22)8 (20)
VHS58 (16)042 (49)22 (55)
VHS/CABG53 (14)3 (75)20 (24)6 (15)
CHD11 (3)04 (5)4 (10)
Age (years), mean±SD65±1169±90.48670±971±80.613
Sex (male, %)285 (78)4 (100)0.28454 (64)30 (75)0.203
Hypertension, N (%)205 (56)1 (25)0.21751 (60)19 (48)0.189
Diabetes mellitus, N (%)101 (28)1 (25)0.91118 (21)9 (23)0.867
Hyperlipidemia, N (%)153 (42)1 (25)0.62719 (22)7 (18)0.533
BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD28±427±30.79827±429±50.163
Antiarrhythmic drugs, N (%)0.9290.032
Class I2 (1)000
Class II251 (68)3 (75)54 (64)21 (53)
Class III5 (1)017 (55)5 (13)
Class IV13 (4)04 (5)0
Left ventricular function, N (%)0.3030.604
Normal279 (76)3 (75)58 (68)24 (60)
Mild impairment68 (19)018 (21)10 (25)
Moderate impairment19 (5)1 (25)8 (9)6 (15)
Severe impairment1 (<1)01 (1)0
Left atrial dilatation, N (%)64 (17)2 (50)0.09037 (44)28 (70)0.002
AF type before CS, N (%)0.260
Paroxysmal AF34 (40)20 (50)
Persistent AF33 (39)13 (33)
Long‐standing Persistent AF17 (20)4 (10)
Permanent AF1 (1)2 (5)
Surgical ablation, N (%)60 (71)20 (50)0.025

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; LPoAF, late postoperative atrial fibrillation; and VHS, valvular heart surgery.

Clinical Charateristics of Patients With and Without LPoAF AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CHD, congenital heart disease; CS, cardiac surgery; LPoAF, late postoperative atrial fibrillation; and VHS, valvular heart surgery. Overall time to LPoAF diagnosis was 6 (3–6) months and was similar in patients with (N=40, 6 [3-6]) and patients without (N=4, 8 [3-21]) preoperative AF (P=0.708).

Relation Between Late Postoperative AF and Intraoperative Inducibility

In 3 (75%) patients with de novo LPoAF, intraoperative induction resulted in sustained AF, the fourth patient had sustained atrial flutter. In patients with AF before surgery, 2 patients with LPoAF were noninducible during surgery, 2 patients had nonsustained AF, 8 patients had sustained AF, and 1 had sustained atrial flutter. However, in the majority of patients (N=27, 35%), AF was spontaneously present at the start of the procedure. As a consequence, there was no correlation between type of arrhythmia induced and development of LPoAF for either patients without (P=0.163) or with (P=0.211) AF before surgery.

Relation Between Early Postoperative and Late Postoperative AF

Four patients without AF before surgery developed LPoAF, including 1 patient without and 3 patients with EPoAF. Consequently, there was no correlation between EPoAF and LPoAF in this subgroup (P=0.116). LPoAF recurrences in the subgroup with AF before surgery was observed in 6 patients without and 34 patients with EPoAF episodes, resulting in a significant correlation between EPoAF and LPoAF: ρ=0.370 and P<0.001. Day of EPoAF onset did not correlate with LPoAF development (P=0.390).

Discussion

Key Findings

Intraoperative AF is inducible in the vast majority of patients. However, it is not correlated with development of EPoAF or LPoAF. In patients without AF before surgery, the incidence of LPoAF is very low and not related to the presence of EPoAF. Clinical patient characteristics did not influence intraoperative AF inducibility or development of either EPoAF or LPoAF.

Relation Between Inducibility and Early Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

The predictive value of AF inducibility for development of EPoAF after cardiothoracic surgery has so far solely been investigated by Lowe et al.7 AF was induced in 72% of 50 patients without a history of AF undergoing CABG, slightly more than in our population. They reported a sensitivity and specificity of AF inducibility for predicting EPoAF of 94% and 41%, respectively. In the present study, AF was inducible in the majority of patients, and the incidence of de novo EPoAF was 37% (overall EPoAF: 43%), which is comparable to incidences reported by other investigators.2, 6, 8 However, a correlation between inducibility of AF and development of EPoAF was absent. Not only did we include a larger study population, but we also tested our hypothesis in patients with various underlying heart diseases. Within all these subgroups, these correlations were lacking. In the study by Lowe et al, all antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued peri‐ and postoperatively, whereas in our study all preoperatively prescribed drugs were continued. As a result, AF inducibility is less likely to occur in our cohort. Although the exact mechanisms of EPoAF are not fully understood, it is generally accepted that it is highly multifactorial in nature.14 Factors promoting development of EPoAF following cardiothoracic surgery include, for example, inflammatory response, sympathetic activation, and oxidative stress. In addition, EPoAF is not solely initiated by the presence of these triggers, but also depends on the presence and extensiveness of an arrhythmogenic substrate.13, 15 Atrial alterations on structural, electrical, and contractile levels cause a higher vulnerability for development of AF.16 Previous studies showed that, in patients in sinus rhythm, the extent of this arrhythmogenic substrate is highly variable in patients with similar clinical profiles.17, 18, 19 Hence, all these factors might contribute to the lacking correlation between AF inducibility alone and development of EPoAF. The incidence of LPoAF in patients without AF before surgery in our study was only 2%. Subsequently, correlations between either AF inducibility or EPoAF and development of LPoAF were absent. This is in contrast to other reports, in which incidence of LPoAF was both higher and correlated to EPoAF.9 In a matched cohort of 488 patients without AF undergoing off‐pump CABG, development of LPoAF was evaluated during a 41±23 month follow‐up period. LPoAF developed in 1.4% of patients without EPoAF, compared with 10.2% of patients with EPoAF (P<0.001). The difference in LPoAF prevalence is most likely due to the longer follow‐up period (up to 87 months) in the latter study group. In another cohort, consisting of 571 CABG patients, EPoAF developed in 29%. Patients with EPoAF had an 8‐fold increase in the risk of LPoAF development during a 3‐year follow‐up period6 Ambrosetti8 followed 710 patients after CABG and/or VHS. The overall LPoAF prevalence was 11% and was associated with development of EPoAF. However, it is unknown whether patients had AF or other arrhythmias before surgery. In the present study, the overall LPoAF incidence was 14% and is thus comparable to the results provided by Ambrosetti. Given the variances in prevalence of LPoAF and the low prevalence in our cohort, the causative relation between cardiothoracic surgery and LPoAF might be questionable. Although one can advocate for the presence of such a relation if LPoAF develops shortly after surgery, this becomes uncertain when LPoAF develops more than several months after surgery. By that time, surgery‐associated triggers including, for example, sterile inflammatory responses and oxidative stress are no longer present. However, general risk factors for AF such as decompensated heart failure and infections are more likely to be responsible for triggering of LPoAF episodes. Development of LPoAF recurrences after surgical ablation in the present study was 25%. This is somewhat similar to previous studies, reporting 66% to 69% success rates 1 year after concomitant surgical ablation.20, 21

Clinical Implications

EPoAF episodes in the current population are usually transient and not predictive for LPoAF. Based on our findings, one could argue whether long‐term oral anticoagulants are indeed mandatory, although included as a Class IIa indication in the AF guidelines.10 A more conservative approach in this subpopulation may be justified with the present data set. In patients with AF before surgery in whom surgical ablation for AF was performed, recurrence rates remain relatively high. As a consequence, these patients should be monitored closely for LPoAF recurrences, before discontinuation of oral anticoagulants can even be considered.

Study Limitations

During long‐term follow‐up, LPoAF had to be documented on ECGs or Holter recordings. Consequently, asymptomatic short‐lasting AF episodes could have been missed. For the subanalysis regarding late postoperative AF we chose to include only patients who completed the 2‐year follow‐up or developed LPoAF within this period. Since a selection of patients had not yet reached the 2‐year end point, they were not included for the subanalysis.

Conclusion

Intraoperative AF inducibility does not predict development of either EPoAF or LPoAF. In patients with AF before surgery, EPoAF is correlated with LPoAF recurrences. This correlation is absent in patients without AF before surgery, in whom the incidence of LPoAF is very low.

Sources of Funding

Dr Groot is supported by LSH‐Impulse grant (no. 40‐43100‐98‐008), Cardiovasculair Onderzoek Nederland (CVON) research grant AFFIP (grant no. 914728), the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Vidi grant (grant no. 91717339), grants from the Erasmus Medical Center fellowship, Dutch Heart Foundation (2012T0046), CoolSingel Foundation (no. 212), Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Teuwen is supported by a grant from the Dutch Heart Foundation (2016T071).

Disclosures

None.
  22 in total

1.  Epicardial Breakthrough Waves During Sinus Rhythm: Depiction of the Arrhythmogenic Substrate?

Authors:  Elisabeth M J P Mouws; Eva A H Lanters; Christophe P Teuwen; Lisette J M E van der Does; Charles Kik; Paul Knops; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-09

2.  New-onset atrial fibrillation predicts long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Patrick Kilgo; Vinod Thourani; Omar M Lattouf; David B Delurgio; Robert A Guyton; Angel R Leon; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Late postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a national survey within the cardiac rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  Marco Ambrosetti; Roberto Tramarin; Raffaele Griffo; Stefania De Feo; Francesco Fattirolli; Annarita Vestri; Carmine Riccio; Pier Luigi Temporelli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Intraoperative identification of cardiac patients at risk to develop postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J E Lowe; P J Hendry; S C Hendrickson; R Wells
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery carries an eightfold risk of future atrial fibrillation and a doubled cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Anders Ahlsson; Espen Fengsrud; Lennart Bodin; Anders Englund
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  The CURE-AF trial: a prospective, multicenter trial of irrigated radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ralph J Damiano; Vinay Badhwar; Michael A Acker; Ramesh S Veeragandham; David C Kress; Jason O Robertson; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 7.  Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms.

Authors:  Bart Maesen; Jan Nijs; Jos Maessen; Maurits Allessie; Ulrich Schotten
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Post-operative atrial fibrillation is associated with a pre-existing structural and electrical substrate in human right atrial myocardium.

Authors:  Junaid A B Zaman; Leanne Harling; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Nigel Gooderham; Thanos Athanasiou; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  A novel intra-operative, high-resolution atrial mapping approach.

Authors:  Ameeta Yaksh; Lisette J M E van der Does; Charles Kik; Paul Knops; Frans B S Oei; Pieter C van de Woestijne; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers; Maurits A Allessie; Natasja M S de Groot
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Debunking Paradoxes: Integrating Complexity in Cardiovascular Disease Research Among Latino Populations.

Authors:  Sandra E Echeverria
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of electrophysiological mapping on non-transmural annulus ablation and atrial fibrillation recurrence prediction after 6 months of Cox-Maze IV procedure.

Authors:  Zhishan Sun; Chengming Fan; Long Song; Hao Zhang; Zenan Jiang; Haoyu Tan; Yaqin Sun; Liming Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.