Lee M Jampol1, Adam R Glassman2, Danni Liu3, Lloyd Paul Aiello4, Neil M Bressler5, Elia J Duh5, Susan Quaggin1, John A Wells6, Charles C Wykoff7. 1. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. 3. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: drcrstat7@jaeb.org. 4. Joslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Harvard Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Palmetto Retina Center, Columbia, South Carolina. 7. Retina Consultants of Houston, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels after treatment with intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. DESIGN: Comparative-effectiveness trial with participants randomly assigned to 2 mg aflibercept, 1.25 mg bevacizumab, or 0.3 mg ranibizumab after a re-treatment algorithm. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with available plasma samples (N = 436). METHODS: Plasma samples were collected before injections at baseline and 4-week, 52-week, and 104-week visits. In a preplanned secondary analysis, systemic-free VEGF levels from an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared across anti-VEGF agents and correlated with systemic side effects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the natural log (ln) of plasma VEGF levels. RESULTS:Baseline free VEGF levels were similar across all 3 groups. At 4 weeks, mean ln(VEGF) changes were -0.30±0.61 pg/ml, -0.31±0.54 pg/ml, and -0.02±0.44 pg/ml for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. The adjusted differences between treatment groups (adjusted confidence interval [CI]; P value) were -0.01 (-0.12 to +0.10; P = 0.89), -0.31 (-0.44 to -0.18; P < 0.001), and -0.30 (-0.43 to -0.18; P < 0.001) for aflibercept-bevacizumab, aflibercept-ranibizumab, and bevacizumab-ranibizumab, respectively. At 52 weeks, a difference in mean VEGF changes between bevacizumab and ranibizumab persisted (-0.23 [-0.38 to -0.09]; P < 0.001); the difference between aflibercept and ranibizumab was -0.12 (P = 0.07) and between aflibercept and bevacizumab was +0.11 (P = 0.07). Treatment group differences at 2 years were similar to 1 year. No apparent treatment differences were detected at 52 or 104 weeks in the cohort of participants not receiving injections within 1 or 2 months before plasma collection. Participants with (N = 9) and without (N = 251) a heart attack or stroke had VEGF levels that appeared similar. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that decreases in plasma free-VEGF levels are greater after treatment with aflibercept or bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab at 4 weeks. At 52 and 104 weeks, a greater decrease was observed in bevacizumab versus ranibizumab. Results from 2 subgroups of participants who did not receive injections within at least 1 month and 2 months before collection suggest similar changes in VEGF levels after stopping injections. It is unknown whether VEGF levels return to normal as the drug is cleared from the system or whether the presence of the drug affects the assay's ability to accurately measure free VEGF. No significant associations between VEGF concentration and systemic factors were noted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels after treatment with intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. DESIGN: Comparative-effectiveness trial with participants randomly assigned to 2 mg aflibercept, 1.25 mg bevacizumab, or 0.3 mg ranibizumab after a re-treatment algorithm. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with available plasma samples (N = 436). METHODS: Plasma samples were collected before injections at baseline and 4-week, 52-week, and 104-week visits. In a preplanned secondary analysis, systemic-free VEGF levels from an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared across anti-VEGF agents and correlated with systemic side effects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the natural log (ln) of plasma VEGF levels. RESULTS: Baseline free VEGF levels were similar across all 3 groups. At 4 weeks, mean ln(VEGF) changes were -0.30±0.61 pg/ml, -0.31±0.54 pg/ml, and -0.02±0.44 pg/ml for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. The adjusted differences between treatment groups (adjusted confidence interval [CI]; P value) were -0.01 (-0.12 to +0.10; P = 0.89), -0.31 (-0.44 to -0.18; P < 0.001), and -0.30 (-0.43 to -0.18; P < 0.001) for aflibercept-bevacizumab, aflibercept-ranibizumab, and bevacizumab-ranibizumab, respectively. At 52 weeks, a difference in mean VEGF changes between bevacizumab and ranibizumab persisted (-0.23 [-0.38 to -0.09]; P < 0.001); the difference between aflibercept and ranibizumab was -0.12 (P = 0.07) and between aflibercept and bevacizumab was +0.11 (P = 0.07). Treatment group differences at 2 years were similar to 1 year. No apparent treatment differences were detected at 52 or 104 weeks in the cohort of participants not receiving injections within 1 or 2 months before plasma collection. Participants with (N = 9) and without (N = 251) a heart attack or stroke had VEGF levels that appeared similar. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that decreases in plasma free-VEGF levels are greater after treatment with aflibercept or bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab at 4 weeks. At 52 and 104 weeks, a greater decrease was observed in bevacizumab versus ranibizumab. Results from 2 subgroups of participants who did not receive injections within at least 1 month and 2 months before collection suggest similar changes in VEGF levels after stopping injections. It is unknown whether VEGF levels return to normal as the drug is cleared from the system or whether the presence of the drug affects the assay's ability to accurately measure free VEGF. No significant associations between VEGF concentration and systemic factors were noted.
Authors: Lingkun Kong; Amit R Bhatt; Ann B Demny; David K Coats; Alexa Li; Effie Z Rahman; O'Brian E Smith; Paul G Steinkuller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Claus Zehetner; Rudolf Kirchmair; Stefan Huber; Martina T Kralinger; Gerhard F Kieselbach Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Yi Zhang; Zhenling Yao; Nitin Kaila; Peter Kuebler; Jennifer Visich; Mauricio Maia; Lisa Tuomi; Jason S Ehrlich; Roman G Rubio; Peter A Campochiaro Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sophie J Bakri; Melissa R Snyder; Joel M Reid; Jose S Pulido; Mohamed K Ezzat; Ravinder J Singh Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Chris A Rogers; Lauren J Scott; Barnaby C Reeves; Susan Downes; Andrew J Lotery; Andrew D Dick; Usha Chakravarthy Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-02
Authors: Robert L Avery; Alessandro A Castellarin; Nathan C Steinle; Dilsher S Dhoot; Dante Joseph Pieramici; Robert See; Stephen Couvillion; Ma'an A Nasir; Melvin D Rabena; Kha Le; Mauricio Maia; Jennifer E Visich Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Peter K Kaiser; Laurent Kodjikian; Jean-Francois Korobelnik; Julia Winkler; Albert Torri; Oliver Zeitz; Robert Vitti; Cristiane Ahlers; Torsten Zimmermann; A Thomas Dicioccio; Joachim Höchel Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2019-03-20
Authors: Sivashanth Gnanasekaran; Esther Bandala-Sanchez; Maria Kolic; Leonid Churilov; Sophie L Rogers; Annie K McAuley; Sukhpal S Sandhu; Salmaan Qureshi; Lyndell L Lim; Sanjeewa S Wickremasinghe Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 2.367