Chuyun Cui1, Yufeng Li2, Dongrong Geng3, Hui Zhang2, Changde Jin4. 1. Graduate College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China. Electronic address: 1213242768@qq.com. 2. Graduate College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China. 3. Jizhou District Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei Province, Hengshui 053200, China. 4. School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China. Electronic address: jcd1886@sina.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based nursing (EBN) on the development of critical thinking for nursing students. DESIGN: A systematic literature review of original studies on randomized controlled trials was conducted. DATA SOURCES: The relevant randomized controlled trials were retrieved from multiple electronic databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Chinese BioMed Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Database. REVIEW METHODS: In order to make a systematic evaluation, studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then according to extracted data and assessed quality. The data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers, and the methodological quality assessment was completed by another two reviewers. All of the data was analyzed by the software RevMan5.3. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 1079 nursing students were chosen in this systematic literature review. The result of this meta-analysis showed that the effectiveness of evidence-based nursing was superior to that of traditional teaching on nursing students' critical thinking. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that evidence-based nursing could help nursing students to promote their development of critical thinking. More researches with higher quality and larger sample size can be analyzed in the further.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based nursing (EBN) on the development of critical thinking for nursing students. DESIGN: A systematic literature review of original studies on randomized controlled trials was conducted. DATA SOURCES: The relevant randomized controlled trials were retrieved from multiple electronic databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Chinese BioMed Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Database. REVIEW METHODS: In order to make a systematic evaluation, studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then according to extracted data and assessed quality. The data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers, and the methodological quality assessment was completed by another two reviewers. All of the data was analyzed by the software RevMan5.3. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 1079 nursing students were chosen in this systematic literature review. The result of this meta-analysis showed that the effectiveness of evidence-based nursing was superior to that of traditional teaching on nursing students' critical thinking. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that evidence-based nursing could help nursing students to promote their development of critical thinking. More researches with higher quality and larger sample size can be analyzed in the further.
Authors: Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero; Carmen Sarabia-Cobo; Montserrat Antonín-Martin; Alicia Borras-Santos; Montserrat Edo-Gual; Vicente Gea-Caballero; José Luis Gómez-Urquiza; José Rafael González-López; María Antonia Martínez-Momblán; Alfonso Meneses-Monroy; Montserrat Montaña-Peironcely; Diego Serrano-Gómez; Azucena Santillán-García Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Athina E Patelarou; Enkeleint A Mechili; María Ruzafa-Martinez; Jakub Dolezel; Joanna Gotlib; Brigita Skela-Savič; Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo; Stefano Finotto; Darja Jarosova; Marta Smodiš; Daniela Mecugni; Mariusz Panczyk; Evridiki Patelarou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 3.390