Literature DB >> 29525267

Are gestures worth a thousand words? Verbal and nonverbal communication during robot-assisted surgery.

Judith Tiferes1, Ahmed A Hussein2, Ann Bisantz3, D Jeffery Higginbotham3, Mohamed Sharif3, Justen Kozlowski4, Basel Ahmad3, Ryan O'Hara3, Nicole Wawrzyniak3, Khurshid Guru4.   

Abstract

Communication breakdowns in the operating room (OR) have been linked to errors during surgery. Robot-assisted surgery (RAS), a new surgical technology, can lead to new challenges in communication owing to the remote location of the surgeon away from the patient and bedside assistants. Nevertheless, few studies have studied communication strategies during RAS. In this study, 11 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies were recorded and the interaction events between the surgeon and two bedside surgical team members were categorized by modality (verbal/nonverbal), topic, and pair (sender and receiver). Both verbal and nonverbal modalities were used by all pairs. The percentage of nonverbal interactions differed significantly by pair: 66% for the Surgeon-Physician Assistant, 50% for the Physician Assistant-Scrub Nurse, and 25% for the Surgeon-Scrub Nurse, indicating different communication strategies across pairs. In addition, there was a significant dependence between topic and the percentages of verbal and nonverbal events for all pairs. Strategies to improve team communication during RAS should take into account the use of verbal and nonverbal communication means and the variation in interaction strategies based on the topic of communication.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Nonverbal; Patient safety; Robot-assisted; Surgery; Teams; Teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29525267     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Falisha Kanji; Ken Catchpole; Eunice Choi; Myrtede Alfred; Kate Cohen; Daniel Shouhed; Jennifer Anger; Tara Cohen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Surgical Performance in Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Ken Catchpole; Armin J Becker; Boris Schlenker; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Enhancing robotic efficiency through the eyes of robotic surgeons: sub-analysis of the expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS) study.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Joseph A Lin; Emily Huang; Patricia O'Sullivan; Rana M Higgins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jannie Lysgaard Poulsen; Birgitte Bruun; Doris Oestergaard; Lene Spanager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Technical considerations and tips for using the Tegus remote proctoring system in elective and emergency cases and in webinars.

Authors:  Alexander von Hessling; Tomás Reyes Del Castillo; Justus Erasmus Roos; Grzegorz Marek Karwacki
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.572

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.