Literature DB >> 29525108

International challenge to model the long-range transport of radioxenon released from medical isotope production to six Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty monitoring stations.

Christian Maurer1, Jonathan Baré2, Jolanta Kusmierczyk-Michulec2, Alice Crawford3, Paul W Eslinger4, Petra Seibert5, Blake Orr6, Anne Philipp7, Ole Ross8, Sylvia Generoso9, Pascal Achim9, Michael Schoeppner10, Alain Malo11, Anders Ringbom12, Olivier Saunier13, Denis Quèlo13, Anne Mathieu13, Yuichi Kijima14, Ariel Stein3, Tianfeng Chai3, Fong Ngan3, Susan J Leadbetter15, Pieter De Meutter16, Andy Delcloo16, Rich Britton17, Ashley Davies17, Lee G Glascoe18, Donald D Lucas18, Matthew D Simpson18, Phil Vogt18, Martin Kalinowski2, Theodore W Bowyer4.   

Abstract

After performing a first multi-model exercise in 2015 a comprehensive and technically more demanding atmospheric transport modelling challenge was organized in 2016. Release data were provided by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization radiopharmaceutical facility in Sydney (Australia) for a one month period. Measured samples for the same time frame were gathered from six International Monitoring System stations in the Southern Hemisphere with distances to the source ranging between 680 (Melbourne) and about 17,000 km (Tristan da Cunha). Participants were prompted to work with unit emissions in pre-defined emission intervals (daily, half-daily, 3-hourly and hourly emission segment lengths) and in order to perform a blind test actual emission values were not provided to them. Despite the quite different settings of the two atmospheric transport modelling challenges there is common evidence that for long-range atmospheric transport using temporally highly resolved emissions and highly space-resolved meteorological input fields has no significant advantage compared to using lower resolved ones. As well an uncertainty of up to 20% in the daily stack emission data turns out to be acceptable for the purpose of a study like this. Model performance at individual stations is quite diverse depending largely on successfully capturing boundary layer processes. No single model-meteorology combination performs best for all stations. Moreover, the stations statistics do not depend on the distance between the source and the individual stations. Finally, it became more evident how future exercises need to be designed. Set-up parameters like the meteorological driver or the output grid resolution should be pre-scribed in order to enhance diversity as well as comparability among model runs.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmospheric transport modelling; Medical isotope production; Model inter-comparison and evaluation; Nuclear explosion monitoring; Radioxenon background

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29525108     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Radioact        ISSN: 0265-931X            Impact factor:   2.674


  1 in total

1.  Source localisation and its uncertainty quantification after the third DPRK nuclear test.

Authors:  Pieter De Meutter; Johan Camps; Andy Delcloo; Piet Termonia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.