| Literature DB >> 29525082 |
Kosuke Matsuzono1, Masayuki Suzuki2, Naoto Arai2, Younhee Kim2, Tadashi Ozawa2, Takafumi Mashiko2, Haruo Shimazaki2, Reiji Koide2, Shigeru Fujimoto2.
Abstract
Some stroke patients with the acute aortic dissection receiving thrombolysis treatment resulted in fatalities. Thus, the concurrent acute aortic dissection is the contraindication for the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. However, the safety and the effectiveness of the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy are not known in patients with stroke some days after acute aortic dissection treatment. Here, we first report a case of a man with a cardioembolism due to the nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, who received the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy 117 days after the traumatic Stanford type A acute aortic dissection operation. Without the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy, the prognosis was expected to be miserable. However, the outcome was good with no complication owing to the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy. Our case suggests the effectiveness and the safety of the intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy to the ischemic stroke some days after acute aortic dissection treatment.Entities:
Keywords: NVAF; Stanford type A; aortic dissection; rt-PA; stroke
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29525082 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ISSN: 1052-3057 Impact factor: 2.136