Literature DB >> 29524888

Influences of observation method, season, soil depth, land use and management practice on soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations: A meta-analysis.

Siqi Li1, Xunhua Zheng2, Chunyan Liu3, Zhisheng Yao3, Wei Zhang3, Shenghui Han3.   

Abstract

Quantifications of soil dissolvable organic carbon concentrations, together with other relevant variables, are needed to understand the carbon biogeochemistry of terrestrial ecosystems. Soil dissolvable organic carbon can generally be grouped into two incomparable categories. One is soil extractable organic carbon (EOC), which is measured by extracting with an aqueous extractant (distilled water or a salt solution). The other is soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which is measured by sampling soil water using tension-free lysimeters or tension samplers. The influences of observation methods, natural factors and management practices on the measured concentrations, which ranged from 2.5-3970 (mean: 69) mg kg-1 of EOC and 0.4-200 (mean: 12) mg L-1 of DOC, were investigated through a meta-analysis. The observation methods (e.g., extractant, extractant-to-soil ratio and pre-treatment) had significant effects on EOC concentrations. The most significant divergence (approximately 109%) occurred especially at the extractant of potassium sulfate (K2SO4) solutions compared to distilled water. As EOC concentrations were significantly different (approximately 47%) between non-cultivated and cultivated soils, they were more suitable than DOC concentrations for assessing the influence of land use on soil dissolvable organic carbon levels. While season did not significantly affect EOC concentrations, DOC concentrations showed significant differences (approximately 50%) in summer and autumn compared to spring. For management practices, applications of crop residues and nitrogen fertilizers showed positive effects (approximately 23% to 91%) on soil EOC concentrations, while tillage displayed negative effects (approximately -17%), compared to no straw, no nitrogen fertilizer and no tillage. Compared to no nitrogen, applications of synthetic nitrogen also appeared to significantly enhance DOC concentrations (approximately 32%). However, further studies are needed in the future to confirm/investigate the effects of ecosystem management practices using standardized EOC measurement protocols or more DOC cases of field experiments.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Land use; Management practice; Observation method; Season; Soil dissolvable organic carbon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29524888     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  The responses of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen to chemical nitrogen fertilizers reduction base on a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chuanzong Li; Oluwaseun Olayemi Aluko; Guang Yuan; Jiayi Li; Haobao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Shift in soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools in different reclaimed lands following intensive coastal reclamation on the coasts of eastern China.

Authors:  Wen Yang; Lu Xia; Zhihong Zhu; Lifen Jiang; Xiaoli Cheng; Shuqing An
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.