Carel J Pretorius1, Jillian R Tate2, Urs Wilgen3, Louise Cullen4, Jacobus P J Ungerer3. 1. Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: carel.pretorius@health.qld.gov.au. 2. Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 3. Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Emergency and Trauma Centre, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the analytical performance, outlier rate, carryover and reference interval of the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI in detail and compared it with historical and other commercial assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the imprecision, detection capability, analytical sensitivity, outlier rate and carryover against two previous Access AccuTnI assay versions. We established the reference interval with stored samples from a previous study and compared the concordances and variances with the Access AccuTnI+3 as well as with two commercial assays. RESULTS: The Access hsTnI had excellent analytical sensitivity with the calibration slope 5.6 times steeper than the Access AccuTnI+3. The detection capability was markedly improved with the SD of the blank 0.18-0.20 ng/L, LoB 0.29-0.33 ng/L and LoD 0.58-0.69 ng/L. All the reference interval samples had a result above the LoB value. At a mean concentration of 2.83 ng/L the SD was 0.28 ng/L (CV 9.8%). Carryover (0.005%) and outlier (0.046%) rates were similar to the Access AccuTnI+3. The combined male and female 99th percentile reference interval was 18.2 ng/L (90% CI 13.2-21.1 ng/L). Concordance amongst the assays was poor with only 16.7%, 19.6% and 15.2% of samples identified by all 4 assays as above the 99th, 97.5th and 95th percentiles. Analytical imprecision was a minor contributor to the observed variances between assays. CONCLUSION: The Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI assay has excellent analytical sensitivity and precision characteristics close to zero. This allows cTnI measurement in all healthy individuals and the capability to identify numerically small differences between serial samples as statistically significant. Concordance in healthy individuals remains poor amongst assays. Crown
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the analytical performance, outlier rate, carryover and reference interval of the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI in detail and compared it with historical and other commercial assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the imprecision, detection capability, analytical sensitivity, outlier rate and carryover against two previous Access AccuTnI assay versions. We established the reference interval with stored samples from a previous study and compared the concordances and variances with the Access AccuTnI+3 as well as with two commercial assays. RESULTS: The Access hsTnI had excellent analytical sensitivity with the calibration slope 5.6 times steeper than the Access AccuTnI+3. The detection capability was markedly improved with the SD of the blank 0.18-0.20 ng/L, LoB 0.29-0.33 ng/L and LoD 0.58-0.69 ng/L. All the reference interval samples had a result above the LoB value. At a mean concentration of 2.83 ng/L the SD was 0.28 ng/L (CV 9.8%). Carryover (0.005%) and outlier (0.046%) rates were similar to the Access AccuTnI+3. The combined male and female 99th percentile reference interval was 18.2 ng/L (90% CI 13.2-21.1 ng/L). Concordance amongst the assays was poor with only 16.7%, 19.6% and 15.2% of samples identified by all 4 assays as above the 99th, 97.5th and 95th percentiles. Analytical imprecision was a minor contributor to the observed variances between assays. CONCLUSION: The Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI assay has excellent analytical sensitivity and precision characteristics close to zero. This allows cTnI measurement in all healthy individuals and the capability to identify numerically small differences between serial samples as statistically significant. Concordance in healthy individuals remains poor amongst assays. Crown
Authors: Edward Carlton; Sarah Campbell; Jenny Ingram; Rebecca Kandiyali; Hazel Taylor; Shahid Aziz; Peter Beresford; Jason Kendall; Adam Reuben; Jason Smith; Patricia Jane Vickery; Jonathan Richard Benger Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: W Frank Peacock; Robert Christenson; Deborah B Diercks; Christian Fromm; Gary F Headden; Christopher J Hogan; Erik B Kulstad; Frank LoVecchio; Richard M Nowak; Jon W Schrock; Adam J Singer; Alan B Storrow; Joely Straseski; Alan H B Wu; Daniel P Zelinski Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Bernard Cook; James McCord; Michael Hudson; Waleed Al-Darzi; Michele Moyer; Gordon Jacobsen; Richard Nowak Journal: Crit Pathw Cardiol Date: 2021-03-01