| Literature DB >> 29523988 |
Imtiaz Hussain Raja Abbasi1, Farzana Abbasi2, Mohamed E Abd El-Hack3, Ayman A Swelum4, Junhu Yao5, Yangchun Cao6.
Abstract
Microbial degradation in the rumen and dietary availability of methionine amino acid have been reported as limiting in dairy ruminants. The aim of the present study was to examine the post-ruminal effects of feeding ruminants different concentrations of rumen-protected methionine (RPM) in low crude protein diets using the long-term rumen simulation method (Rusitec) followed by in vitro abomasum and ileum digestibility technique. The experiment contained four treatment groups: (1) high protein, without RPM supplementation (HP); (2) low protein, without RPM supplementation (LP); (3) low protein supplementation with low RPM (LPLM); and (4) low protein supplementation with high RPM (LPHM) mixed per 20 ± 0.04 g basal diet in every fermenter. The results showed that the LPLM and LPHM groups had significantly higher disappearance of crude protein and neutral detergent fiber in the abomasum and ileum than the HP treatment (P < 0.05) and were the same as the LP group (P > 0.05). The proportions of short-chain fatty acids and total volatile fatty acids in the abomasum and ileum were the same between the LPHM and HP groups (P > 0.05); however, the LPLM group was found to be significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the HP group and similar to the LP group (P > 0.05). Rusitec pH before or after changing feed bags and daily ammonia nitrogen production in the abomasum and ileum were non significantly (P > 0.05) different among all groups. In conclusion, RPM supplementation with low crude protein diets promoted post-ruminal digestibility and production of volatile fatty acids.Entities:
Keywords: In-vitro digestibility; Methionine; Post-ruminal; Protein; Rusitec
Year: 2018 PMID: 29523988 PMCID: PMC5845091 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0566-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets fed by donor animals and supplied daily to each fermenter (DM basis, g/day)
| Items | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |
| Ingredients supply (g/day) | ||||
| Corn silage | 3.65 | 3.87 | 3.87 | 3.87 |
| Alfalfa hay | 2.03 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Wheat straw | 3.06 | 4.28 | 4.27 | 4.27 |
| Ground corn | 3.25 | 4.33 | 4.33 | 4.33 |
| Wheat bran | 1.56 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| Soybean meal | 1.41 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.01 |
| Cottonseed meal | 1.92 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Corn germ meal | 2.31 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.11 |
| Limestone | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| NaCl | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Premixa | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| RPM | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0021 | 0.0200 |
| Chemical composition | ||||
| Dry matter (g/day) | 9.03 | 8.90 | 8.92 | 8.94 |
| Crude protein (g/day) | 1.63 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.43 |
| aNeutral detergent fiber (g/day) | 4.71 | 4.72 | 4.71 | 4.70 |
| Acid detergent fiber (g/day) | 2.12 | 2.11 | 2.05 | 2.12 |
| Ether extract (g/day) | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Gross energy (MJ/day) | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
aPremix (contains): 9.80 mg Zn, 10.5 mg Cu, 12.00 mg Mn, 0.32 mg I, 0.15 mg Se, 0.11 mg Co, 500 IU vitamin D3, 40 IU vitamin E, and 2500 IU vitamin A, per kilogram of TMR on DM basis
Low dietary protein supplemented with rumen-protected methionine effects on disappearance at abomasum using in vitro digestibility technique (means; n = 4)
| Substrate disappearance | Treatments | SEM | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |||
| Dry matter (g/kg DM) | 242.92 | 250.92 | 252.89 | 259.55 | 6.22 | 0.85 |
| Crude protein (g/kg DM) | 517.92b | 557.18a | 560.53a | 566.53a | 6.45 | 0.01 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM) | 174.10b | 178.61a,b | 179.37a,b | 182.47a | 1.01 | 0.03 |
| Acid detergent fiber (g/kg DM) | 136.60 | 129.10 | 130.31 | 135.21 | 2.61 | 0.73 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg DM) | 314.72 | 311.22 | 314.73 | 315.74 | 4.79 | 0.99 |
SEM standard error of the mean
a,b Superscripts values within the same row, are significantly different at (P < 0.05)
Low dietary protein supplemented with rumen-protected methionine effects on disappearance at ileum portion using in vitro digestibility technique (means; n = 4)
| Substrate disappearance | Treatments | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |||
| Dry matter (g/kg DM) | 474.41 | 473.34 | 476.38 | 480.87 | 3.41 | 0.89 |
| Crude protein (g/kg DM) | 774.40b | 907.58a | 871.90a | 875.45a | 14.49 | < 0.01 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM) | 400.13b | 418.75a,b | 420.41a,b | 424.08a | 3.30 | 0.02 |
| Acid detergent fiber (g/kg DM) | 345.44 | 351.88 | 358.39 | 354.44 | 4.48 | 0.81 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg DM) | 517.85 | 507.97 | 511.44 | 518.66 | 3.93 | 0.77 |
SEM standard error of the mean
a,b Superscripts values within the same row, are significantly different at (P < 0.05)
Effects of rumen-protected methionine supplementation with low dietary protein on the post-ruminal production of NH3-N and Rusitec pH using a rumen simulation technique and in vitro digestibility technique (means; n = 4)
| Items | Treatments | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |||
| pH before feedinga | 6.60 | 6.65 | 6.62 | 6.64 | 0.01 | 0.83 |
| pH after feeding (0–24 h)a | 6.65 | 6.68 | 6.37 | 6.73 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
| Abomasum NH3-N (mg/100 mL) | 5.72 | 4.45 | 4.95 | 5.78 | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| Ileum NH3-N (mg/100 mL) | 16.27 | 15.06 | 15.91 | 16.23 | 0.59 | 0.93 |
Values within the same row are different at (P < 0.05)
SEM standard error of the mean
aRusitec pH value
Low dietary protein with rumen-protected methionine supplementation effects on daily production of total and individual volatile fatty acids using an in vitro abomasum digestibility technique (means; n = 4)
| Items | Treatments | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |||
| Total VFA (mM) | 52.81a | 45.07b | 48.74a,b | 51.92a | 1.23 | 0.03 |
| Acetate (mM) | 29.79a | 25.34b | 27.97a,b | 29.07a,b | 0.70 | 0.04 |
| Propionate (mM) | 11.8a | 9.74b | 10.40a,b | 11.72a | 0.36 | 0.04 |
| Isobutyrate (mM) | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.76 |
| Butyrate (mM) | 6.76a | 6.17b | 6.30b | 6.64a | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| Isovalerate (mM) | 1.33 | 1.47 | 1.40 | 1.44 | 0.04 | 0.81 |
| Valerate (mM) | 2.70 | 1.94 | 2.29 | 2.63 | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Acetate:propionate ratio | 2.52 | 2.60 | 2.69 | 2.48 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
VFA volatile fatty acids, SEM standard error of the mean
a,b Superscripts values within the same row are significantly different at (P < 0.05)
Low dietary protein with rumen-protected methionine supplementation effects on daily production of total and individual volatile fatty acids using an in vitro ileum digestibility technique (means; n = 4)
| Items | Treatments | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP | LP | LPLM | LPHM | |||
| Total VFA (mM) | 29.18a | 23.02b | 24.44b | 28.26a | 0.98 | 0.00 |
| Acetate (mM) | 19.78a | 16.14b | 17.20b | 19.31a | 0.57 | 0.00 |
| Propionate (mM) | 4.92a | 4.05b | 4.29b | 4.82a | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| Isobutyrate (mM) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Butyrate (mM) | 2.74a | 1.77b | 1.87b | 2.46a | 0.15 | 0.00 |
| Isovalerate (mM) | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| Valerate (mM) | 1.13a | 0.59b | 0.60b | 1.04a | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| Acetate:propionate ratio | 4.02 | 3.98 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 0.02 | 0.96 |
VFA volatile fatty acids, SEM standard error of the mean
a,b Superscripts values within the same row are significantly different at (P < 0.05)