| Literature DB >> 29523979 |
Carolina Díaz-Cárdenas1, Angela Cantillo2, Laura Yinneth Rojas3, Tito Sandoval3, Susana Fiorentino3, Jorge Robles4, Freddy A Ramos5, María Mercedes Zambrano2, Sandra Baena6.
Abstract
The original version of this article (Diaz-Cardenas et al. 2017) unfortunately contained a mistake in Fig. 1. The pie chart of Fig. 1 should explain the distribution of the relative abundance of the Bacteria and Archaea strains isolated at Zipaquirá salt mine: Proteobacteria 39%; Actinobacteria 9%, Bacteroidetes 1%, Archaea 3% and Firmicutes 48% instead of NOMBRE DE CATEGORIA [PORCENTAJE]. The corrected Fig. 1 and caption are given below.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29523979 PMCID: PMC5845087 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0561-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Distribution of the relative abundance of the Bacteria and Archaea strains isolated at Zipaquirá salt mine