Ben Wilkins1, Satish Hullikunte1, Mark Simmonds1, Alexander Sasse2, Peter Larsen3, Scott A Harding4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand. 2. Department of Cardiology, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand; Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group, Wellington, New Zealand. 3. Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group, Wellington, New Zealand; University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. 4. Department of Cardiology, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand; Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group, Wellington, New Zealand; Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: scott.harding@ccdhb.org.nz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of a pre-discharge medication checklist on discharge prescription rates of guideline recommended medications following myocardial infarction. In addition, we assessed what proportion of the residual prescribing gap following implementation of the checklist was due to the presence of contraindications. METHODS: We examined baseline prescription rates of guideline recommended medications in 100 patients discharged from our institution following acute myocardial infarction. We then introduced a pre-discharge checklist and reassessed discharge medications and reasons for non-prescription of guideline recommended medications in 447 patients with acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: We demonstrated a significant gap in the prescription of guideline recommended secondary prevention medications at the time of discharge in our pre-intervention cohort. Introduction of a pre-discharge checklist resulted in a significant improvement in the prescription rates of all guideline recommended secondary prevention medications, with aspirin increasing from 90% to 97% (p=0.004), Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist from 84% to 96% (p=0.0001), B-blocker from 79% to 87% (p=0.03), statin from 88% to 96% (p=0.002) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor from 58% to 70% (p=0.03). The residual gap in prescribing was largely explained by the presence of contraindications or absence of an indication in the case of ACE-inhibitors. Once these were taken into account there was a residual gap of 0-4% which represents genuine non-adherence to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a pre-discharge checklist led to significant improvement in prescription rates of all five guideline recommended secondary prevention medications. The residual gap in medication prescription following introduction of the checklist was largely due to the presence of contraindications rather than non-adherence.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the effect of a pre-discharge medication checklist on discharge prescription rates of guideline recommended medications following myocardial infarction. In addition, we assessed what proportion of the residual prescribing gap following implementation of the checklist was due to the presence of contraindications. METHODS: We examined baseline prescription rates of guideline recommended medications in 100 patients discharged from our institution following acute myocardial infarction. We then introduced a pre-discharge checklist and reassessed discharge medications and reasons for non-prescription of guideline recommended medications in 447 patients with acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: We demonstrated a significant gap in the prescription of guideline recommended secondary prevention medications at the time of discharge in our pre-intervention cohort. Introduction of a pre-discharge checklist resulted in a significant improvement in the prescription rates of all guideline recommended secondary prevention medications, with aspirin increasing from 90% to 97% (p=0.004), Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist from 84% to 96% (p=0.0001), B-blocker from 79% to 87% (p=0.03), statin from 88% to 96% (p=0.002) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor from 58% to 70% (p=0.03). The residual gap in prescribing was largely explained by the presence of contraindications or absence of an indication in the case of ACE-inhibitors. Once these were taken into account there was a residual gap of 0-4% which represents genuine non-adherence to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a pre-discharge checklist led to significant improvement in prescription rates of all five guideline recommended secondary prevention medications. The residual gap in medication prescription following introduction of the checklist was largely due to the presence of contraindications rather than non-adherence.