Diego E Pafundo1, Takeaki Miyamae1, David A Lewis1, Guillermo Gonzalez-Burgos2. 1. Translational Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Translational Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: gburgos@pitt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Testing hypotheses regarding the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction in schizophrenia requires understanding the mechanisms of NMDAR regulation of prefrontal cortex (PFC) circuit function. NMDAR antagonists are thought to produce pyramidal cell (PC) disinhibition. However, inhibitory parvalbumin-positive basket cells (PVBCs) have modest NMDAR-mediated excitatory drive and thus are unlikely to participate in NMDAR antagonist-mediated disinhibition. Interestingly, recent studies demonstrated that presynaptic NMDARs enhance transmitter release at central synapses. Thus, if presynaptic NMDARs enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid release at PVBC-to-PC synapses, they could participate in NMDAR-dependent PC disinhibition. Here, we examined whether presynaptic NMDAR effects could modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid release at PVBC-to-PC synapses in mouse PFC. METHODS: Using whole-cell recordings from synaptically connected pairs in mouse PFC, we determined whether NMDA or NMDAR antagonist application affects PVBC-to-PC inhibition in a manner consistent with a presynaptic mechanism. RESULTS: NMDAR activation enhanced by ∼40% the synaptic current at PVBC-to-PC pairs. This effect was consistent with a presynaptic mechanism given that it was 1) observed with postsynaptic NMDARs blocked by intracellular MK801, 2) associated with a lower rate of transmission failures and a higher transmitter release probability, and 3) blocked by intracellular MK801 in the PVBC. NMDAR antagonist application did not affect the synaptic currents in PVBC-to-PC pairs, but it reduced the inhibitory currents elicited in PCs with simultaneous glutamate release by extracellular stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that NMDAR activation enhances PVBC-to-PC inhibition in a manner consistent with presynaptic mechanisms, and we suggest that the functional impact of this presynaptic effect depends on the activity state of the PFC network.
BACKGROUND: Testing hypotheses regarding the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction in schizophrenia requires understanding the mechanisms of NMDAR regulation of prefrontal cortex (PFC) circuit function. NMDAR antagonists are thought to produce pyramidal cell (PC) disinhibition. However, inhibitory parvalbumin-positive basket cells (PVBCs) have modest NMDAR-mediated excitatory drive and thus are unlikely to participate in NMDAR antagonist-mediated disinhibition. Interestingly, recent studies demonstrated that presynaptic NMDARs enhance transmitter release at central synapses. Thus, if presynaptic NMDARs enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid release at PVBC-to-PC synapses, they could participate in NMDAR-dependent PC disinhibition. Here, we examined whether presynaptic NMDAR effects could modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid release at PVBC-to-PC synapses in mouse PFC. METHODS: Using whole-cell recordings from synaptically connected pairs in mouse PFC, we determined whether NMDA or NMDAR antagonist application affects PVBC-to-PC inhibition in a manner consistent with a presynaptic mechanism. RESULTS:NMDAR activation enhanced by ∼40% the synaptic current at PVBC-to-PC pairs. This effect was consistent with a presynaptic mechanism given that it was 1) observed with postsynaptic NMDARs blocked by intracellular MK801, 2) associated with a lower rate of transmission failures and a higher transmitter release probability, and 3) blocked by intracellular MK801 in the PVBC. NMDAR antagonist application did not affect the synaptic currents in PVBC-to-PC pairs, but it reduced the inhibitory currents elicited in PCs with simultaneous glutamate release by extracellular stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that NMDAR activation enhances PVBC-to-PC inhibition in a manner consistent with presynaptic mechanisms, and we suggest that the functional impact of this presynaptic effect depends on the activity state of the PFC network.
Authors: Guillermo Gonzalez-Burgos; Takeaki Miyamae; Diego E Pafundo; Hiroki Yoshino; Diana C Rotaru; Gil Hoftman; Dibyadeep Datta; Yun Zhang; Mahjub Hammond; Allan R Sampson; Kenneth N Fish; G Bard Ermentrout; David A Lewis Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Rylan S Larsen; Rebekah J Corlew; Maile A Henson; Adam C Roberts; Masayoshi Mishina; Masahiko Watanabe; Stuart A Lipton; Nobuki Nakanishi; Isabel Pérez-Otaño; Richard J Weinberg; Benjamin D Philpot Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2011-02-06 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: John A Saunders; Valerie M Tatard-Leitman; Jimmy Suh; Eddie N Billingslea; Timothy P Roberts; Steven J Siegel Journal: Autism Res Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Kasper B Hansen; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Derek Bowie; Hiro Furukawa; Frank S Menniti; Alexander I Sobolevsky; Geoffrey T Swanson; Sharon A Swanger; Ingo H Greger; Terunaga Nakagawa; Chris J McBain; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Chian-Ming Low; Mark L Dell'Acqua; Jeffrey S Diamond; Chad R Camp; Riley E Perszyk; Hongjie Yuan; Stephen F Traynelis Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 18.923
Authors: Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Davide Rivolta; Joachim Gross; Ruchika Gajwani; Stephen M Lawrie; Matthias Schwannauer; Tonio Heidegger; Michael Wibral; Wolf Singer; Andreas Sauer; Bertram Scheller; Peter J Uhlhaas Journal: Brain Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Alexei M Bygrave; Kasyoka Kilonzo; Dimitri M Kullmann; David M Bannerman; Dennis Kätzel Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.157