Literature DB >> 29523233

Targeting Allostery with Avatars to Design Inhibitors Assessed by Cell Activity: Dissecting MRE11 Endo- and Exonuclease Activities.

Davide Moiani1, Daryl A Ronato2, Chris A Brosey1, Andrew S Arvai3, Aleem Syed1, Jean-Yves Masson2, Elena Petricci4, John A Tainer5.   

Abstract

For inhibitor design, as in most research, the best system is question dependent. We suggest structurally defined allostery to design specific inhibitors that target regions beyond active sites. We choose systems allowing efficient quality structures with conformational changes as optimal for structure-based design to optimize inhibitors. We maintain that evolutionarily related targets logically provide molecular avatars, where this Sanskrit term for descent includes ideas of functional relationships and of being a physical embodiment of the target's essential features without requiring high sequence identity. Appropriate biochemical and cell assays provide quantitative measurements, and for biomedical impacts, any inhibitor's activity should be validated in human cells. Specificity is effectively shown empirically by testing if mutations blocking target activity remove cellular inhibitor impact. We propose this approach to be superior to experiments testing for lack of cross-reactivity among possible related enzymes, which is a challenging negative experiment. As an exemplary avatar system for protein and DNA allosteric conformational controls, we focus here on developing separation-of-function inhibitors for meiotic recombination 11 nuclease activities. This was achieved not by targeting the active site but rather by geometrically impacting loop motifs analogously to ribosome antibiotics. These loops are neighboring the dimer interface and active site act in sculpting dsDNA and ssDNA into catalytically competent complexes. One of our design constraints is to preserve DNA substrate binding to geometrically block competing enzymes and pathways from the damaged site. We validate our allosteric approach to controlling outcomes in human cells by reversing the radiation sensitivity and genomic instability in BRCA mutant cells.
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical inhibitors; DNA repair pathways; Double-strand breaks; Endonuclease; Exonuclease; MRE11

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29523233      PMCID: PMC6070142          DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  110 in total

1.  Privileged scaffolds or promiscuous binders: a comparative study on rhodanines and related heterocycles in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Thomas Mendgen; Christian Steuer; Christian D Klein
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  ATP hydrolysis by RAD50 protein switches MRE11 enzyme from endonuclease to exonuclease.

Authors:  Jerzy Majka; Brian Alford; Juan Ausio; Ron M Finn; Cynthia T McMurray
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  ATM regulates Mre11-dependent DNA end-degradation and microhomology-mediated end joining.

Authors:  Elias A Rahal; Leigh A Henricksen; Yuling Li; R Scott Williams; John A Tainer; Kathleen Dixon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 conformations and the control of sensing, signaling, and effector responses at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Gareth J Williams; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-10-28

Review 5.  Allosteric enzymes as models for chemomechanical energy transducing assemblies.

Authors:  E J Goldsmith
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  What Combined Measurements From Structures and Imaging Tell Us About DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Chris A Brosey; Zamal Ahmed; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Diphenylpyrazoles as replication protein a inhibitors.

Authors:  Alex G Waterson; J Phillip Kennedy; James D Patrone; Nicholas F Pelz; Michael D Feldkamp; Andreas O Frank; Bhavatarini Vangamudi; Elaine M Souza-Fagundes; Olivia W Rossanese; Walter J Chazin; Stephen W Fesik
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template.

Authors:  R Scott Williams; Jessica S Williams; John A Tainer
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.626

9.  PARP1-dependent kinetics of recruitment of MRE11 and NBS1 proteins to multiple DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Jean-François Haince; Darin McDonald; Amélie Rodrigue; Ugo Déry; Jean-Yves Masson; Michael J Hendzel; Guy G Poirier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Mre11 ATLD17/18 mutation retains Tel1/ATM activity but blocks DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Oliver Limbo; Davide Moiani; Aryandi Kertokalio; Claire Wyman; John A Tainer; Paul Russell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of Damage Signaling and Outcomes to Stress in DNA Replication and Repair.

Authors:  Aleem Syed; John A Tainer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  DYNLL1 binds to MRE11 to limit DNA end resection in BRCA1-deficient cells.

Authors:  Yizhou Joseph He; Khyati Meghani; Marie-Christine Caron; Chunyu Yang; Daryl A Ronato; Jie Bian; Anchal Sharma; Jessica Moore; Joshi Niraj; Alexandre Detappe; John G Doench; Gaelle Legube; David E Root; Alan D D'Andrea; Pascal Drané; Subhajyoti De; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Jean-Yves Masson; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  APE1: A skilled nucleic acid surgeon.

Authors:  Amy M Whitaker; Bret D Freudenthal
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 4.  Evolving SAXS versatility: solution X-ray scattering for macromolecular architecture, functional landscapes, and integrative structural biology.

Authors:  Chris A Brosey; John A Tainer
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  SPRTN protease-cleaved MRE11 decreases DNA repair and radiosensitises cancer cells.

Authors:  Juri Na; Joseph A Newman; Chee Kin Then; Junetha Syed; Iolanda Vendrell; Ignacio Torrecilla; Sophie Ellermann; Kristijan Ramadan; Roman Fischer; Anne E Kiltie
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  DROSHA is recruited to DNA damage sites by the MRN complex to promote non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Matteo Cabrini; Marco Roncador; Alessandro Galbiati; Lina Cipolla; Antonio Maffia; Fabio Iannelli; Simone Sabbioneda; Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna; Sofia Francia
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  X-ray scattering reveals disordered linkers and dynamic interfaces in complexes and mechanisms for DNA double-strand break repair impacting cell and cancer biology.

Authors:  Michal Hammel; John A Tainer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 8.  Function and Molecular Mechanism of the DNA Damage Response in Immunity and Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zu Ye; Yin Shi; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 8.786

9.  An effective human uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor targets the open pre-catalytic active site conformation.

Authors:  My T Nguyen; Davide Moiani; Zamal Ahmed; Andrew S Arvai; Sarita Namjoshi; Dave S Shin; Yuriy Fedorov; Edward J Selvik; Darin E Jones; John Pink; Yan Yan; Daniel J Laverty; Zachary D Nagel; John A Tainer; Stanton L Gerson
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  Fragment- and structure-based drug discovery for developing therapeutic agents targeting the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Ashley M Deacon; Matthew A J Duncton; Patricia Pellicena; Millie M Georgiadis; Andrew P Yeh; Andrew S Arvai; Davide Moiani; John A Tainer; Debanu Das
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.