Susanne Roser-Page1, Tatyana Vikulina1,2, Kanglun Yu3, Meghan E McGee-Lawrence3,4, M Neale Weitzmann1,2,5. 1. Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA. 2. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. 5. The Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Immunosuppressive biologics are used in the management of RA and additional immunomodulators are under investigation including modulators of the CD40/CD40 ligand (CD40L) costimulation pathway. Tampering with immune function can have unanticipated skeletal consequences due to disruption of the immuno-skeletal interface, a nexus of shared cells and cytokine effectors serving discrete functions in both immune and skeletal systems. In this study, we examined the effect of MR1, a CD40L neutralizing antibody, on physiological bone remodelling in healthy mice. Methods: Female C57BL6 mice were treated with MR1 and BMD was quantified by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and indices of trabecular bone structure were quantified by micro-CT. Serum biochemical markers were used to evaluate bone turnover and formation indices by histomorphometry. Results: Unexpectedly, MR1 stimulated significant accretion of BMD and trabecular bone mass in the spine, but not in long bones. Surprisingly, bone accretion was accompanied by a significant increase in bone formation, rather than suppression of bone resorption. Mechanistically, MR1-induced bone accrual was associated with increased Treg development and elevated production of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, a costimulation inhibitor that promotes T cell anergy and CD8+ T cell expression of the bone anabolic ligand Wnt-10b. Conclusion: Our studies reveal an unexpected bone anabolic activity of pharmacological CD40L suppression. Therapeutic targeting of the CD40L pathway may indeed have unforeseen consequences for the skeleton, but may also constitute a novel strategy to promote bone formation to ameliorate osteoporotic bone loss and reduce fracture risk in the axial skeleton.
Objective: Immunosuppressive biologics are used in the management of RA and additional immunomodulators are under investigation including modulators of the CD40/CD40 ligand (CD40L) costimulation pathway. Tampering with immune function can have unanticipated skeletal consequences due to disruption of the immuno-skeletal interface, a nexus of shared cells and cytokine effectors serving discrete functions in both immune and skeletal systems. In this study, we examined the effect of MR1, a CD40L neutralizing antibody, on physiological bone remodelling in healthy mice. Methods: Female C57BL6 mice were treated with MR1 and BMD was quantified by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and indices of trabecular bone structure were quantified by micro-CT. Serum biochemical markers were used to evaluate bone turnover and formation indices by histomorphometry. Results: Unexpectedly, MR1 stimulated significant accretion of BMD and trabecular bone mass in the spine, but not in long bones. Surprisingly, bone accretion was accompanied by a significant increase in bone formation, rather than suppression of bone resorption. Mechanistically, MR1-induced bone accrual was associated with increased Treg development and elevated production of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4, a costimulation inhibitor that promotes T cell anergy and CD8+ T cell expression of the bone anabolic ligand Wnt-10b. Conclusion: Our studies reveal an unexpected bone anabolic activity of pharmacological CD40L suppression. Therapeutic targeting of the CD40L pathway may indeed have unforeseen consequences for the skeleton, but may also constitute a novel strategy to promote bone formation to ameliorate osteoporotic bone loss and reduce fracture risk in the axial skeleton.
Authors: Ivana R Ferrer; Maylene E Wagener; Minqing Song; Allan D Kirk; Christian P Larsen; Mandy L Ford Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: F Cordoba; G Wieczorek; M Audet; L Roth; M A Schneider; A Kunkler; N Stuber; M Erard; M Ceci; R Baumgartner; R Apolloni; A Cattini; G Robert; D Ristig; J Munz; L Haeberli; R Grau; D Sickert; C Heusser; P Espie; C Bruns; D Patel; J S Rush Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jerid W Robinson; Jau-Yi Li; Lindsey D Walker; Abdul Malik Tyagi; Michael A Reott; Mingcan Yu; Jonathan Adams; M Neale Weitzmann; Roberto Pacifici Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sergio A Quezada; Bruce Fuller; Lamis Z Jarvinen; Mercedes Gonzalez; Bruce R Blazar; Alexander Y Rudensky; Terry B Strom; Randolph J Noelle Journal: Blood Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: David W Dempster; Juliet E Compston; Marc K Drezner; Francis H Glorieux; John A Kanis; Hartmut Malluche; Pierre J Meunier; Susan M Ott; Robert R Recker; A Michael Parfitt Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Klara Sjögren; Cecilia Engdahl; Petra Henning; Ulf H Lerner; Valentina Tremaroli; Marie K Lagerquist; Fredrik Bäckhed; Claes Ohlsson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.741