Literature DB >> 29522180

Passive Tick Surveillance Provides an Accurate Early Signal of Emerging Lyme Disease Risk and Human Cases in Southern Canada.

Marion Ripoche1,2, Salima Gasmi2,3, Ariane Adam-Poupart2,3, Jules K Koffi2,4, L Robbin Lindsay5, Antoinette Ludwig2,6, François Milord2,7, Nicholas H Ogden2,6, Karine Thivierge2,8,9, Patrick A Leighton1,2.   

Abstract

Lyme disease is an emerging public health threat in Canada. In this context, rapid detection of new risk areas is essential for timely application of prevention and control measures. In Canada, information on Lyme disease risk is collected through three surveillance activities: active tick surveillance, passive tick surveillance, and reported human cases. However, each method has shortcomings that limit its ability to rapidly and reliably identify new risk areas. We investigated the relationships between risk signals provided by human cases, passive and active tick surveillance to assess the performance of tick surveillance for early detection of emerging risk areas. We used regression models to investigate the relationships between the reported human cases, Ixodes scapularis (Say; Acari: Ixodidae) ticks collected on humans through passive surveillance and the density of nymphs collected by active surveillance from 2009 to 2014 in the province of Quebec. We then developed new risk indicators and validated their ability to discriminate risk levels used by provincial public health authorities. While there was a significant positive relationship between the risk signals provided all three surveillance methods, the strongest association was between passive tick surveillance and reported human cases. Passive tick submissions were a reasonable indicator of the abundance of ticks in the environment (sensitivity and specificity [Se and Sp] < 0.70), but were a much better indicator of municipalities with more than three human cases reported over 5 yr (Se = 0.88; Sp = 0.90). These results suggest that passive tick surveillance provides a timely and reliable signal of emerging risk areas for Lyme disease in Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29522180     DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjy030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  21 in total

1.  Behavioral responses of Ixodes scapularis tick to natural products: development of novel repellents.

Authors:  Nicoletta Faraone; Samantha MacPherson; N Kirk Hillier
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Highlights of Medical Entomology 2018: The Importance of Sustainable Surveillance of Vectors and Vector-Borne Pathogens.

Authors:  Roxanne Connelly
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 3.  Benefits and Drawbacks of Citizen Science to Complement Traditional Data Gathering Approaches for Medically Important Hard Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in the United States.

Authors:  Lars Eisen; Rebecca J Eisen
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Sentinel surveillance of Lyme disease risk in Canada, 2019: Results from the first year of the Canadian Lyme Sentinel Network (CaLSeN).

Authors:  Camille Guillot; Jackie Badcock; Katie Clow; Jennifer Cram; Shaun Dergousoff; Antonia Dibernardo; Michelle Evason; Erin Fraser; Eleni Galanis; Salima Gasmi; Greg J German; Douglas T Howse; Claire Jardine; Emily Jenkins; Jules Koffi; Manisha Kulkarni; L Robbin Lindsay; Genevieve Lumsden; Roman McKay; Kieran Moore; Muhammad Morshed; Douglas Munn; Mark Nelder; Joe Nocera; Marion Ripoche; Kateryn Rochon; Curtis Russell; Andreea Slatculescu; Benoit Talbot; Karine Thivierge; Maarten Voordouw; Catherine Bouchard; Patrick Leighton
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Statewide Passive Surveillance of Ixodes scapularis and Associated Pathogens in Maine.

Authors:  Thomas F Rounsville; Griffin M Dill; Ann M Bryant; Claudia C Desjardins; James F Dill
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.133

6.  Spatiotemporal trends and socioecological factors associated with Lyme disease in eastern Ontario, Canada from 2010-2017.

Authors:  Andreea M Slatculescu; Claudia Duguay; Nicholas H Ogden; Beate Sander; Marc Desjardins; D William Cameron; Manisha A Kulkarni
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Reconciling the Entomological Hazard and Disease Risk in the Lyme Disease System.

Authors:  Max McClure; Maria Diuk-Wasser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Detection of municipalities at-risk of Lyme disease using passive surveillance of Ixodes scapularis as an early signal: A province-specific indicator in Canada.

Authors:  Salima Gasmi; Nicholas H Ogden; Marion Ripoche; Patrick A Leighton; Robbin L Lindsay; Mark P Nelder; Erin Rees; Catherine Bouchard; Linda Vrbova; Richard Rusk; Curtis Russell; Yann Pelcat; Samir Mechai; Serge-Olivier Kotchi; Jules K Koffi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting spatiotemporal patterns of Lyme disease incidence from passively collected surveillance data for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato-infected Ixodes scapularis ticks.

Authors:  Eliza A H Little; John F Anderson; Kirby C Stafford; Lars Eisen; Rebecca J Eisen; Goudarz Molaei
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.744

10.  Using citizen science to describe the prevalence and distribution of tick bite and exposure to tick-borne diseases in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan C Nieto; W Tanner Porter; Julie C Wachara; Thomas J Lowrey; Luke Martin; Peter J Motyka; Daniel J Salkeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.