Literature DB >> 29521938

The Growth of Trochlear Dysplasia During Adolescence.

Shital N Parikh1, Neil Rajdev2, Qin Sun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral trochlear dysplasia is a known risk factor for patellar instability. The growth pattern of the normal trochlea is known, but there have been no studies investigating the growth and development of the dysplastic trochlea. The purpose of this study was to assess the growth pattern of trochlear dysplasia in adolescents.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, magnetic resonance images of adolescents with patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia were evaluated. These images were measured for lateral and medial condylar height, trochlear height, cartilaginous and bony trochlear bump, and cartilaginous and bony sulcus angle. The type of trochlear dysplasia was classified as per Dejour classification. These measurements were plotted against age, and their growth patterns were evaluated using statistical methods.
RESULTS: Of 235 knees with patellar instability, trochlear dysplasia was present in 175 knees (74% knees) and these were further analyzed. With increasing age, the mean lateral and medial condylar heights and mean trochlear height showed statistically significant increase (P<0.01). Cartilaginous trochlear bump (slope=0.15, P=0.013) and bony trochlear bump (slope=0.22, P<0.01) increased with age, with some reaching the pathologic value by age of 15.1 years. After age 11 years, there were no significant changes for cartilaginous and bony sulcus angles (cartilage: slope=0.03, P=0.96; bony: slope=-0.90, P=0.11). The mean cartilaginous sulcus angle was significantly greater than the mean bony sulcus angle (P<0.01). All Dejour types of trochlear dysplasia were present across all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: All linear measurements of trochlear dysplasia (condylar height, trochlear height, trochlear bump) increased with age. However, the shape of trochlear dysplasia, as reflected by sulcus angle and Dejour classification, did not change with increasing age. The shape of trochlear dysplasia is most likely a genetic predisposition and does not necessarily change during skeletal growth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic, cross-sectional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29521938     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

1.  Medialization of trochlear groove was correlated with extended lateral trochlear in trochlear dysplasia: a transverse CT analysis.

Authors:  Conglei Dong; Chao Zhao; Lingce Kong; Kang Piao; Kuo Hao; Fei Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  The dysplastic trochlear sulcus due to the insufficient patellar stress in growing rats.

Authors:  Guangmin Yang; Faquan Li; Jiangfeng Lu; Yingzhen Niu; Yike Dai; Lixiong Zuo; Gengshuang Tian; Fei Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The Evaluation of Trochlear Osseous Morphology: An Epidemiologic Study.

Authors:  Gabriel I Onor; Sercan Yalcin; Scott G Kaar; J Lee Pace; Paolo Ferrua; Lutul D Farrow
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-02

4.  Cartilage degeneration is associated with activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in a growing rat experimental model of developmental trochlear dysplasia.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Huijun Kang; Yingzhen Niu; Jinghui Niu; Chongyi Fan; Xunkai Feng; Fei Wang
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 10.479

5.  What is the relationship between the breech presentation and femoral trochlear dysplasia? An experimental study of the breech presentation model in neonatal rats.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Shengjie Wang; Shiyu Tang; Zhenyue Dong; Fei Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Trochlear Morphology Development: Study of Normal Pediatric Knee MRIs.

Authors:  Myra Trivellas; Benjamin Kelley; Nicole West; Nicholas J Jackson; Jennifer J Beck
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.537

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.