Julia Caroline Radosa1, Marc Philipp Radosa2, Pascal Albert Schweitzer3, Ingolf Juhasz-Boess3, Stefan Rimbach4, Erich-Franz Solomayer3. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrbergerstraße 100, 66421, Homburg, Germany. Julia.radosa@uks.eu. 2. Department of Gynecology, Agaplesion Diakonie Hospital Kassel, Herkulesstraße 34, 34119, Kassel, Germany. 3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrbergerstraße 100, 66421, Homburg, Germany. 4. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Agatharied Hospital, Sankt-Agathastrasse 1, 83734, Hausham, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to assess the opinions of members of the German Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) regarding the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian malignancies and current practice at their institutions. METHODS: Between February and October 2015, the AGE sent an anonymous online survey via mail to its members. The questionnaire solicited participants' opinions about the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian cancers according to T stage and borderline tumors, and information about current practice at their institutions. Participants were also asked their opinions on currently available data on this issue. RESULTS: Of 228 AGE members who completed the survey, 132 (58%) were fellows or attending physicians and 156 (68%) worked at university hospitals or tertiary referral centers. Most [212 (93%)] respondents stated that < 10% of all ovarian cancer cases were currently treated laparoscopically at their institutions. Most participants indicated that T1 (a, b, c) tumors [145 (64%)] and ovarian borderline tumors [206 (90%)], but not T2 [48 (21%)] or T3/4 [9 (4%) ovarian tumors] should or could be treated laparoscopically. One hundred seventy-two (75%) participants considered currently available data on this topic to be insufficient and 152 (66%) stated that they would take part in a clinical trial assessing a laparoscopic approach to T1/2 ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: According to this survey, to the opinion of the majority of AGE members, laparoscopy might be a considerable option for the treatment of early ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors and should be evaluated further in future studies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to assess the opinions of members of the German Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) regarding the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian malignancies and current practice at their institutions. METHODS: Between February and October 2015, the AGE sent an anonymous online survey via mail to its members. The questionnaire solicited participants' opinions about the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian cancers according to T stage and borderline tumors, and information about current practice at their institutions. Participants were also asked their opinions on currently available data on this issue. RESULTS: Of 228 AGE members who completed the survey, 132 (58%) were fellows or attending physicians and 156 (68%) worked at university hospitals or tertiary referral centers. Most [212 (93%)] respondents stated that < 10% of all ovarian cancer cases were currently treated laparoscopically at their institutions. Most participants indicated that T1 (a, b, c) tumors [145 (64%)] and ovarian borderline tumors [206 (90%)], but not T2 [48 (21%)] or T3/4 [9 (4%) ovarian tumors] should or could be treated laparoscopically. One hundred seventy-two (75%) participants considered currently available data on this topic to be insufficient and 152 (66%) stated that they would take part in a clinical trial assessing a laparoscopic approach to T1/2 ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: According to this survey, to the opinion of the majority of AGE members, laparoscopy might be a considerable option for the treatment of early ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors and should be evaluated further in future studies.
Authors: J S M Zimmermann; J C Radosa; M P Radosa; P Sklavounos; P A Schweitzer; E F Solomayer Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.344