Literature DB >> 29520632

Affective auditory stimulus database: An expanded version of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-E).

Wanlu Yang1, Kai Makita2,3, Takashi Nakao4, Noriaki Kanayama2, Maro G Machizawa2, Takafumi Sasaoka2, Ayako Sugata5,6, Ryota Kobayashi4, Ryosuke Hiramoto4, Shigeto Yamawaki2, Makoto Iwanaga6, Makoto Miyatani4.   

Abstract

Using appropriate stimuli to evoke emotions is especially important for researching emotion. Psychologists have provided several standardized affective stimulus databases-such as the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) and the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS) as visual stimulus databases, as well as the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS) and the Montreal Affective Voices as auditory stimulus databases for emotional experiments. However, considering the limitations of the existing auditory stimulus database studies, research using auditory stimuli is relatively limited compared with the studies using visual stimuli. First, the number of sample sounds is limited, making it difficult to equate across emotional conditions and semantic categories. Second, some artificially created materials (music or human voice) may fail to accurately drive the intended emotional processes. Our principal aim was to expand existing auditory affective sample database to sufficiently cover natural sounds. We asked 207 participants to rate 935 sounds (including the sounds from the IADS-2) using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) and three basic-emotion rating scales. The results showed that emotions in sounds can be distinguished on the affective rating scales, and the stability of the evaluations of sounds revealed that we have successfully provided a larger corpus of natural, emotionally evocative auditory stimuli, covering a wide range of semantic categories. Our expanded, standardized sound sample database may promote a wide range of research in auditory systems and the possible interactions with other sensory modalities, encouraging direct reliable comparisons of outcomes from different researchers in the field of psychology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective auditory stimuli; Affective ratings; Emotion; International Affective Digitized Sounds; SAM

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29520632     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1027-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  The taste & affect music database: Subjective rating norms for a new set of musical stimuli.

Authors:  David Guedes; Marília Prada; Margarida Vaz Garrido; Elsa Lamy
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  The Mandarin Chinese auditory emotions stimulus database: A validated set of Chinese pseudo-sentences.

Authors:  Bingyan Gong; Na Li; Qiuhong Li; Xinyuan Yan; Jing Chen; Liang Li; Xihong Wu; Chao Wu
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 3.  EEG-Based BCI Emotion Recognition: A Survey.

Authors:  Edgar P Torres P; Edgar A Torres; Myriam Hernández-Álvarez; Sang Guun Yoo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Affective rating of audio and video clips using the EmojiGrid.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-08-11

5.  Early posterior negativity indicates time dilation by arousal.

Authors:  Ezgi Özoğlu; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Assessments of Acoustic Environments by Emotions - The Application of Emotion Theory in Soundscape.

Authors:  André Fiebig; Pamela Jordan; Cleopatra Christina Moshona
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20

7.  Auditory and cross-modal attentional bias toward positive natural sounds: Behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Yanmei Wang; Zhenwei Tang; Xiaoxuan Zhang; Libing Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Reliability of web-based affective auditory stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Tricia X F Seow; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 9.  Naturalistic Stimuli in Affective Neuroimaging: A Review.

Authors:  Heini Saarimäki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Normatively Irrelevant Affective Cues Affect Risk-Taking under Uncertainty: Insights from the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), Skin Conductance Response, and Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Giulia Priolo; Marco D'Alessandro; Andrea Bizzego; Nicolao Bonini
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.