Jannie Nielsen1,2, Adam Hulman3,4, Daniel R Witte3,4. 1. Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, Building 9, Mailbox 2099, 1014, Copenhagen K., Denmark. Jannien@sund.ku.dk. 2. Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Jannien@sund.ku.dk. 3. Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In the UK, more than one million people have undiagnosed diabetes and an additional five million are at high risk of developing the disease. Given that early identification of these people is key for both primary and secondary prevention, new screening approaches are needed. Since spouses resemble each other in cardiometabolic risk factors related to type 2 diabetes, we aimed to investigate whether diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors in one spouse can be used as an indicator of incident type 2 diabetes in the other spouse. METHODS: We analysed data from 3649 men and 3478 women from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing with information on their own and their spouse's diabetes status and cardiometabolic risk factors. We modelled incidence rates and incidence rate ratios with Poisson regression, using spousal diabetes status or cardiometabolic risk factors (i.e. BMI, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic BP, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerols) as exposures and type 2 diabetes incidence in the index individual as the outcome. Models were adjusted for two nested sets of covariates. RESULTS: Spousal BMI and waist circumference were associated with incident type 2 diabetes, but with different patterns for men and women. A man's risk of type 2 diabetes increased more steeply with his wife's obesity level, and the association remained statistically significant even after adjustment for the man's own obesity level. Having a wife with a 5 kg/m2 higher BMI (30 kg/m2 vs 25 kg/m2) was associated with a 21% (95% CI 11%, 33%) increased risk of type 2 diabetes. In contrast, the association between incident type 2 diabetes in a woman and her husband's BMI was attenuated after adjusting for the woman's own obesity level. Findings for waist circumference were similar to those for BMI. Regarding other risk factors, we found a statistically significant association only between the risk of type 2 diabetes in women and their husbands' triacylglycerol levels. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The main finding of this study is the sex-specific effect of spousal obesity on the risk of type 2 diabetes. Having an obese spouse increases an individual's risk of type 2 diabetes over and above the effect of the individual's own obesity level among men, but not among women. Our results suggest that a couples-focused approach may be beneficial for the early detection of type 2 diabetes and individuals at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, especially in men, who are less likely than women to attend health checks. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data were accessed via the UK Data Service under the data-sharing agreement no. 91400 ( https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=5050&type=Data%20catalogue ).
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In the UK, more than one million people have undiagnosed diabetes and an additional five million are at high risk of developing the disease. Given that early identification of these people is key for both primary and secondary prevention, new screening approaches are needed. Since spouses resemble each other in cardiometabolic risk factors related to type 2 diabetes, we aimed to investigate whether diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors in one spouse can be used as an indicator of incident type 2 diabetes in the other spouse. METHODS: We analysed data from 3649 men and 3478 women from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing with information on their own and their spouse's diabetes status and cardiometabolic risk factors. We modelled incidence rates and incidence rate ratios with Poisson regression, using spousal diabetes status or cardiometabolic risk factors (i.e. BMI, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic BP, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerols) as exposures and type 2 diabetes incidence in the index individual as the outcome. Models were adjusted for two nested sets of covariates. RESULTS: Spousal BMI and waist circumference were associated with incident type 2 diabetes, but with different patterns for men and women. A man's risk of type 2 diabetes increased more steeply with his wife's obesity level, and the association remained statistically significant even after adjustment for the man's own obesity level. Having a wife with a 5 kg/m2 higher BMI (30 kg/m2 vs 25 kg/m2) was associated with a 21% (95% CI 11%, 33%) increased risk of type 2 diabetes. In contrast, the association between incident type 2 diabetes in a woman and her husband's BMI was attenuated after adjusting for the woman's own obesity level. Findings for waist circumference were similar to those for BMI. Regarding other risk factors, we found a statistically significant association only between the risk of type 2 diabetes in women and their husbands' triacylglycerol levels. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The main finding of this study is the sex-specific effect of spousal obesity on the risk of type 2 diabetes. Having an obese spouse increases an individual's risk of type 2 diabetes over and above the effect of the individual's own obesity level among men, but not among women. Our results suggest that a couples-focused approach may be beneficial for the early detection of type 2 diabetes and individuals at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, especially in men, who are less likely than women to attend health checks. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data were accessed via the UK Data Service under the data-sharing agreement no. 91400 ( https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=5050&type=Data%20catalogue ).
Authors: J E Manson; E B Rimm; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; A S Krolewski; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-09-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Linda S Geiss; Cherie James; Edward W Gregg; Ann Albright; David F Williamson; Catherine C Cowie Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jaana Lindström; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Markku Peltonen; Sirkka Aunola; Johan G Eriksson; Katri Hemiö; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauri Laakso; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Paturi; Jouko Sundvall; Timo T Valle; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sridharan Raghavan; Mark C Pachucki; Yuchiao Chang; Bianca Porneala; Caroline S Fox; Josée Dupuis; James B Meigs Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John Robson; Isabel Dostal; Aziz Sheikh; Sandra Eldridge; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Chris Griffiths; Carol Coupland; Julia Hippisley-Cox Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Duke Appiah; Pamela J Schreiner; Elizabeth Selvin; Ellen W Demerath; James S Pankow Journal: Acta Diabetol Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 4.280