| Literature DB >> 29520552 |
Katharina M Keiblinger1, Franz Zehetner2, Axel Mentler2, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern2.
Abstract
Biochar (BC) application to soils is of growing interest as a strategy to improve soil fertility and mitigate climate change. However, BC-induced alterations in the soil N cycle are currently under debate. BC has recently been shown to accelerate the emissions of N2O via the biotic ammonium oxidation pathway, which results in lower nitrogen use efficiency and environmentally harmful losses of NO3 and/ or N2O. To avoid these potential losses, the use of nitrification inhibitor (NI) could provide a useful mitigation strategy for BC-amended agricultural fields. Here, we tested the sorption behavior of a model NI, the synthetic 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on 15-month-aged soil-BC mixtures. We saw that BC additions increased DMPP sorption to varying extents depending on BC feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature. The highest sorption was found for BC pyrolyzed at a lower temperature. BC effects on soil physico-chemical characteristics (i.e., hydrophobicity) seem to be important factors.Entities:
Keywords: Biochar; DMPP; Hydrophobicity; Nitrification inhibitor; Nitrogen cycle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29520552 PMCID: PMC5895663 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1658-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Langmuir isotherms for DMPP sorbed to control soil and soil-BC mixtures, with BC derived from woodchips (WC), vineyard pruning (VP), and wheat straw (WS), applied at a concentration of 1 and 3% and varying pyrolysis temperature (T1, 400 °C; T2, 525 °C). The Langmuir equation (Eq. 1) was used to fit the data (0.928 < R2 < 0.994). Different letters indicate statistical significance between treatments at the highest concentration using ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05, n = 3). The parameters for the Langmuir isotherm qmax (mg kg−1) and KL (L g−1) are shown (n = 3). Error bars indicate standard deviation
Basic characteristics of biochars and soil-biochar mixtures (according to Kloss et al. (2014) and Keiblinger et al. (2015))
| SSA, (m2 g−1) | Contact angle, (°) | Ash content, (wt%) | EC, (mS cm−1) | OC | pH (CaCl2) (1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control soil | 18.36 ± 0.03 | 1.6 ± 0.5a | 5.5 ± 0.05a | |||
| WC1% | 26.4 ± 0.8d | 13.8 ± 17.5a | 15.2 | 17.91 ± 0.18 | 1.7 ± 0.3a | 6.5 ± 0.07c |
| WC3% | 18.50 ± 0.03 | 3.5 ± 0.6ab | 6.7 ± 0.01d | |||
| WS3% | 12.3 ± 1.3c | 21.3 ± 9.1a | 28.1 | 18.38 ± 0.05 | 4.6 ± 0.9b | 6.3 ± 0.00b |
| VP3%T1 | 1.7 ± 0.1a | 73.8 ± 15.9c | 4.3 | 18.41 ± 0.07 | 3.3 ± 2.0ab | 6.4 ± 0.00c |
| VP3%T2 | 4.8 ± 0.3b | 49.2 ± 17.7b | 7.7 | 18.00 ± 0.20 | 4.3 ± 1.4b | 6.5 ± 0.02c |
Biochars derived from woodchips (WC), vineyard pruning (VP), and wheat straw (WS), applied at a concentration of 1 and 3% and varying pyrolysis temperature (T1, 400 °C; T2, 525 °C); values are mean ± standard error. Specific surface area (SSA) and ash content were determined from the initial biochars before application; the organic carbon (OC) was measured after 7-month incubation in the pot experiment (four replicates); the water contact angle (a measure of hydrophobicity) of the BCs after 15 months. The electrical conductivity (EC) was measured from the supernatants; different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple range test)