Literature DB >> 29519746

Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in women.

Paulo Fernandes Pires1, Ester Moreira de Castro1, Elisa Bizetti Pelai1, Ana Beatriz Chiconelo de Arruda2, Delaine Rodrigues-Bigaton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Fonseca Anamnestic Index is a questionnaire used to classify individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Previous studies have shown that the Fonseca Anamnestic Index provides a multidimensional measurement of the temporomandibular disorders construct and that the main dimension presents a good fit to the model according to the item response theory.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the between-day reliability, accuracy, and best cut-off score of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorders.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 123 women (57 with myogenous temporomandibular disorders and 66 asymptomatic), evaluated by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The participants answered the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index on two occasions with a seven-day interval between tests. For the analysis of between-day reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient, the standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change were used. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the best cut-off point.
RESULTS: The Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient≥0.95) for all items and for the total Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index score (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98; standard error of measurement=3.28; minimum detectable change=9.09). The level of accuracy of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorders was high (area under the curve of 0.97), with a better cut-off score of 17.5 points.
CONCLUSION: The Fonseca Anamnestic Index should be used in its short form to classify the absence of myogenous temporomandibular disorders (scores between 0 and 15 points) or presence of myogenous temporomandibular disorders (scores between 20 and 50 points) in women.
Copyright © 2018 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy studies; Diagnosis; Reliability; Sensitivity and specificity; Temporomandibular joint disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29519746      PMCID: PMC6095093          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther        ISSN: 1413-3555            Impact factor:   3.377


  24 in total

Review 1.  Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M Greiner; D Pfeiffer; R D Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Aerobic exercise alters analgesia and neurotrophin-3 synthesis in an animal model of chronic widespread pain.

Authors:  Neena K Sharma; Janelle M Ryals; Byron J Gajewski; Douglas E Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-03-25

Review 3.  Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique.

Authors:  S F Dworkin; L LeResche
Journal:  J Craniomandib Disord       Date:  1992

4.  Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.

Authors:  Eric Schiffman; Richard Ohrbach; Edmond Truelove; John Look; Gary Anderson; Jean-Paul Goulet; Thomas List; Peter Svensson; Yoly Gonzalez; Frank Lobbezoo; Ambra Michelotti; Sharon L Brooks; Werner Ceusters; Mark Drangsholt; Dominik Ettlin; Charly Gaul; Louis J Goldberg; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Lars Hollender; Rigmor Jensen; Mike T John; Antoon De Laat; Reny de Leeuw; William Maixner; Marylee van der Meulen; Greg M Murray; Donald R Nixdorf; Sandro Palla; Arne Petersson; Paul Pionchon; Barry Smith; Corine M Visscher; Joanna Zakrzewska; Samuel F Dworkin
Journal:  J Oral Facial Pain Headache       Date:  2014

5.  The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: validity of Axis I diagnoses.

Authors:  Edmond Truelove; Wei Pan; John O Look; Lloyd A Mancl; Richard K Ohrbach; Ana M Velly; Kimberly H Huggins; Patricia Lenton; Eric L Shiffman
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2010

6.  Accuracy of the surface electromyography RMS processing for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Kelly Cristina dos Santos Berni; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Paulo Fernandes Pires; Delaine Rodrigues-Bigaton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Anamnestic index severity and signs and symptoms of TMD.

Authors:  Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi; Thaís Cristina Chaves; Anamaria S de Oliveira; Vanessa Monteiro-Pedro
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests and signs of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Reneker; Jaime Paz; Christopher Petrosino; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Severity of temporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index.

Authors:  Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos; Andréa Corrêa Carrascosa; Fernanda Salloume Sampaio Bonafé; João Maroco
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2014

10.  The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  5 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence and infrared thermography as auxiliary tools in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Elisa Diniz de Lima; José Alberto Souza Paulino; Ana Priscila Lira de Farias Freitas; José Eraldo Viana Ferreira; Jussara da Silva Barbosa; Diego Filipe Bezerra Silva; Patrícia Meira Bento; Ana Marly Araújo Maia Amorim; Daniela Pita Melo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  College Students with Oral Habits Exhibit Worse Psychological Status and Temporomandibular-Related Quality of Life: A Correlational Study.

Authors:  Wenke Yang; Xin Xiong; Yange Wu; Yufan Zhu; Jiaqi Liu; Chengxinyue Ye; Qinlanhui Zhang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.667

3.  Predictability and Accuracy of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in Relation to the Modified Helkimo Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Enrique Yarasca-Berrocal; José Huamani-Echaccaya; Rita Tolmos-Valdivia; Luis Tolmos-Regal; Carlos López-Gurreonero; Luis A Cervantes-Ganoza; César F Cayo-Rojas
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Roger Alonso-Royo; Carmen María Sánchez-Torrelo; Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera; Noelia Zagalaz-Anula; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Esteban Obrero-Gaitán; Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro; Rafael Lomas-Vega
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  The Short Form of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for the Screening of Temporomandibular Disorders: Validity and Reliability in a Spanish-Speaking Population.

Authors:  Noelia Zagalaz-Anula; Carmen María Sánchez-Torrelo; Faustino Acebal-Blanco; Roger Alonso-Royo; Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera; Esteban Obrero-Gaitán; Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro; Rafael Lomas-Vega
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.