Literature DB >> 29519725

Neuropeptide Y as a possible homeostatic element for changes in cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Danny Jazmati1, Ute Neubacher1, Klaus Funke2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is able to modify cortical excitability. Rat rTMS studies revealed a modulation of inhibitory systems, in particular that of the parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, when using intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS).
OBJECTIVE: The potential disinhibitory action of iTBS raises the questions of how neocortical circuits stabilize excitatory-inhibitory balance within a physiological range. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) appears to be one candidate.
METHODS: Analysis of cortical expression of PV, NPY and vesicular glutamate transporter type 1 (vGluT1) by immunohistochemical means at the level of cell counts, mean neuropil expression and single cell pre-/postsynaptic expression, with and without intraventricular NPY-injection.
RESULTS: Our results show that iTBS not only reduced the number of neurons with high-PV expression in a dose-dependent fashion, but also increased the cortical expression of NPY, discussed to reduce glutamatergic transmission, and this was further associated with a reduced vGluT1 expression, an indicator of glutamateric presynaptic activity. Interneurons showing a low-PV expression exhibit less presynaptic vGluT1 expression compared to those with a high-PV expression. Intraventricular application of NPY prior to iTBS prevented the iTBS-induced reduction in the number of high-PV neurons, the reduction in tissue vGluT1 level and that presynaptic to high-PV cells.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that NPY, possibly via a global but also slow homeostatic control of glutamatergic transmission, modulates the strength and direction of the iTBS effects, likely preventing pathological imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory cortical activity but still allowing enough disinhibition beneficial for plastic changes as during learning.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fast-spiking interneurons; Glutamatergic transmission; Homeostatic regulation of inhibition; Parvalbumin; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29519725     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  4 in total

1.  Effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in aged rats depend on pre-treatment cognitive status: Toward individualized intervention for successful cognitive aging.

Authors:  Marina Weiler; Perla Moreno-Castilla; Hannah M Starnes; Edward L R Melendez; Kevin C Stieger; Jeffrey M Long; Peter R Rapp
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 9.184

2.  γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate/glutamine alterations of the left prefrontal cortex in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Hang Su; Tianzhen Chen; Na Zhong; Haifeng Jiang; Jiang Du; Ke Xiao; Ding Xu; Zheng Wang; Min Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation recovers cortical map plasticity induced by sensory deprivation due to deafferentiation.

Authors:  Ellen Kloosterboer; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Are We Ready?

Authors:  Marina Weiler; Kevin C Stieger; Jeffrey M Long; Peter R Rapp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-01-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.