Literature DB >> 29518224

In vivo ultrasound and biometric measurements predict the empty body chemical composition in Nellore cattle.

A M Castilhos1, C L Francisco2, R H Branco3, S F M Bonilha3, M E Z Mercadante3, P R L Meirelles1, C M Pariz1, A M Jorge2.   

Abstract

Evaluation of the body chemical composition of beef cattle can only be measured postmortem and those data cannot be used in real production scenarios to adjust nutritional plans. The objective of this study was to develop multiple linear regression equations from in vivo measurements, such as ultrasound parameters [backfat thickness (uBFT, mm), rump fat thickness (uRF, mm), and ribeye area (uLMA, cm2)], shrunk body weight (SBW, kg), age (AG, d), hip height (HH, m), as well as from postmortem measurements (composition of the 9th to 11th rib section) to predict the empty body and carcass chemical composition for Nellore cattle. Thirty-three young bulls were used (339 ± 36.15 kg and 448 ± 17.78 d for initial weight and age, respectively). Empty body chemical composition (protein, fat, water, and ash in kg) was obtained by combining noncarcass and carcass components. Data were analyzed using the PROC REG procedure of SAS software. Mallows' Cp values were close to the ideal value of number of independent variables in the prediction equations plus one. Equations to predict chemical components of both empty body and carcass using in vivo measurements presented higher R2 values than those determined by postmortem measurements. Chemical composition of the empty body using in vivo measurements was predicted with R2 > 0.73. Equations to predict chemical composition of the carcass from in vivo measurements showed R2 lower (R2< 0.68) than observed for empty body, except for the water (R2 = 0.84). The independent variables SBW, uRF, and AG were sufficient to predict the fat, water, energy components of the empty body, whereas for estimation of protein content the uRF, HH, and SBW were satisfactory. For the calculation of the ash, the SBW variable in the equation was sufficient. Chemical compounds from components of the empty body of Nellore cattle can be calculated by the following equations: protein (kg) = 47.92 + 0.18 × SBW - 1.46 × uRF - 30.72 × HH (R2 = 0.94, RMSPE = 1.79); fat (kg) = 11.33 + 0.16 × SBW + 2.09 × uRF - 0.06 × AG (R2 = 0.74, RMSPE = 4.18); water (kg) = - 34.00 + 0.55 × SBW + 0.10 × AG - 2.34 × uRF (R2 = 0.96, RMSPE = 5.47). In conclusion, the coefficients of determination (for determining the chemical composition of the empty body) of the equations derived from in vivo measures were higher than those of the equations obtained from rib section measurements taken postmortem, and better than coefficients of determination of the equations to predict the chemical composition of the carcass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29518224      PMCID: PMC6140984          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Using ultrasound measurements to predict body composition of yearling bulls.

Authors:  M J Baker; L O Tedeschi; D G Fox; W R Henning; D J Ketchen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Chemical composition of whole body and carcass of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds.

Authors:  S F M Bonilha; L O Tedeschi; I U Packer; A G Razook; R F Nardon; L A Figueiredo; G F Alleoni
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  T L Mader; M S Davis; T Brown-Brandl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Using real-time ultrasound and carcass measurements to estimate total internal fat in beef cattle over different breed types and managements.

Authors:  F R B Ribeiro; L O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Body chemical composition of Nellore bulls with different residual feed intakes.

Authors:  E F M Bonilha; R H Branco; S F M Bonilha; F L Araujo; E Magnani; M E Z Mercadante
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Predicting net energy and protein requirements for growth of implanted and nonimplanted heifers and steers and nonimplanted bulls varying in body size.

Authors:  T P Tylutki; D G Fox; R G Anrique
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Growth and development of meat animals.

Authors:  A Trenkle; D N Marple
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Evaluation of carcass characteristics of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds selected for postweaning weight.

Authors:  S F M Bonilha; L O Tedeschi; I U Packer; A G Razook; G F Alleoni; R F Nardon; F D Resende
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effects of body weight, frame size and rate of gain on the composition of gain of beef steers.

Authors:  J W Oltjen; W N Garrett
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review.

Authors:  A M Scholz; L Bünger; J Kongsro; U Baulain; A D Mitchell
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediction of Carcass Traits of Hair Sheep Lambs Using Body Measurements.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bautista-Díaz; Jesús Alberto Mezo-Solis; José Herrera-Camacho; Aldenamar Cruz-Hernández; Armando Gomez-Vazquez; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi; Héctor Aarón Lee-Rangel; Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; Alfonso Juventino Chay-Canul
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.