Literature DB >> 29517861

Blind spot in lung cancer lymph node metastasis: Cross-lobe peripheral lymph node metastasis in early stage patients.

Ning Li1, Fengwei Tan1, Jiagen Li1, Kang Shao1, Jun Zhao1, Juwei Mu1, Shugeng Gao1, Jie He1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, it has not yet been determined whether metastasis can be transferred cross-lobe to peripheral lymph nodes (LNs) from other lobes in early stages of lung cancer, especially without any direct involvement to the pleura and parenchyma of the lobe. This study was conducted to investigate this issue.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Patients undergoing right middle and lower lobectomy with lymphadenectomy for preoperative clinical stage Ia-IIIa from 2014 to 2015 were identified. To avoid interference, cases were limited to tumors within the primary lobe. When a tumor is completely located in the lower lobe, no direct invasion occurs into the visceral pleura/bronchus/parenchyma of the middle lobe and tumor cell metastasis into the peripheral LNs (stations 12-14) in the middle lobe is defined as cross-lobe lymph node metastasis (CLM).
RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were identified, of which nine (13.2%) had CLM. Seven had squamous cell carcinoma, one adenocarcinoma, and one small cell carcinoma. Seven cases (77.8%) had intermediate bronchus invasion, and seven cases (77.8%) intermediate bronchus adjacent lymph node involvement (station 11). Compared to non-CLM patients, tumor diameter (5.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.28), N2 lymph node metastasis rate (66.7% vs. 28.8%; P = 0.03), late stage (IIIa 77.8% vs. 35.6%; P = 0.04), and invasion of intermediate bronchus (77.8% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.07) relatively increased.
CONCLUSION: Non-primary lobe peripheral LN metastasis exists in lung cancer and requires greater attention and further study.
© 2018 National Cancer Center China. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Cross-lobe metastasiszzm321990; zzm321990lung cancerzzm321990; zzm321990lymph nodeszzm321990; zzm321990metastasiszzm321990

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29517861      PMCID: PMC5879049          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is a common type of metastasis of the lung.1 LN metastasis in lung cancer commonly follows a pattern: from solid tumor metastasis to the peripheral LNs (stations 12–14) in the primary lobe, then to the interlobar LNs (station 11), to the hilar LNs (station 10), and to the mediastinal LNs (stations 2–9).2, 3, 4 Although special circumstances, such as skip5, 6 or micro7 metastasis may occur, the lymphatic drainage pattern is widely recognized. However, there have been no reports as to whether tumor cells could go beyond this pathway and metastasize to the non‐primary lobe of the peripheral LN. In clinical practice, we found lung cancer metastasis in the right middle lobe peripheral LN, while tumors located only in the right lower lobe did not directly invade the middle lobe. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate this issue.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of lung cancer patients who underwent right middle and lower lobectomy with lymphadenectomy between November 2014 and November 2015 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Surgical and pathology reports of each patient were carefully analyzed. To avoid interference, we only enrolled cases in which the tumor occurred within one lobe. Cases of tumors that directly invaded both lobes of the lung parenchyma or pleura, the presence of pulmonary metastasis, and tumors that originated in the intermediate bronchus of the right lung, as well as non‐primary lung cancer cases, were excluded. Patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as those who underwent LN sampling, were also excluded. Primary lung tumor location, size, histological type, degree of differentiation, LN metastasis, invasion of the intermediate bronchus, invasion between fissures, patient age, gender, and tumor node metastasis stage were recorded. Two cancer specialist pathologists conducted detailed anatomical examinations of resected lung specimens to determine LN metastasis. In particular, peripheral LN metastasis was evaluated, including segmental/sub‐segmental LN (stations 13 and 14) and lobar LNs (station 12). Lobar LNs (station 12) refer to those located adjacent to the lobar bronchial lymph, while segmental/sub‐segmental LNs (stations 13 and 14) refer to those located next to the segmental bronchi and the following parts of the LNs.1, 8 When a tumor is completely located in the lower lobe, no direct invasion occurs into the visceral pleura/bronchus/parenchyma of the middle lobe. Tumor cell metastasis into the peripheral LNs (stations 12–14) in the middle lobe is defined as cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis (CLM). The institutional review board approved the study. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In univariate analysis, differences between the CLM and control groups were analyzed using X2 or Fisher's exact tests. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

One hundred and thirty‐seven patients were admitted and underwent right lung middle and lower lobe resection at the Cancer Hospital between 2014 and 2015. Among these patients, 48 with tumor invasion of two lobes of lung parenchyma, 6 with pulmonary metastasis, 12 with tumors that originated form the intermediate bronchus, and 3 with benign lesions were excluded from the study. A total of 68 patients that underwent routine middle and lower lobectomy were included. Basic patient information including gender, age, tumor size, histological type, differentiation of cancer cells, pathologic stage, and LN metastasis is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic features of patients (n = 68)

VariablesNo.%
Gender
Male5885.3%
Female1014.7%
Age
Range27–82
< 593754.4%
> 603145.6%
Tumor size
Range0.6–11
< 3 cm2638.2%
> 3 cm4261.8%
Histology type
SCC4769.1%
AD1014.7%
SCLC45.9%
LCLC11.5%
Mucinous adenocarcinoma34.4%
Adenoid cystic carcinoma11.5%
Carcinoid22.9%
Differentiation
Poor2339.0%
Moderate3355.9%
Well35.1%
Lesion location
Middle lobe45.9%
Lower lobe6494.1%
Intermediate bronchus invasion
Yes3450.0%
No3450.0%
Pulmonary vascular invasion
Yes913.2%
No5986.8%
Visceral pleura invasion
Yes1725.0%
No5175.0%
Stage
I1623.5%
II2435.3%
IIIa2841.2%
N2 metastasis
Yes2333.8%
No4566.2%

AD, adenocarcinoma; LCLC, large cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Clinicopathologic features of patients (n = 68) AD, adenocarcinoma; LCLC, large cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer. Nine patients had CLM, with tumors located in the right lower lobe, and cancer cells metastasized to the peripheral LNs (stations 12–14) of the right middle lobe, while parenchyma and pleura of the right middle lobe were cancer free. All patients were male, the maximum tumor diameter was 1.8–7.5 cm, and pathological types comprised squamous cell carcinoma (7), adenocarcinoma (1), and small cell carcinoma (1). Seven cases had intermediate bronchus invasion and one had invasion of the hilar blood vessels. Furthermore, seven cases were positive in the intermediate bronchus adjacent LN (station 11), and six were positive for peripheral LN metastasis in the right lower lobe (stations 12–14). Patients had 2–12 metastatic LNs and the pathological stages were IIB (2 patients), and IIIA (7 patients) (Table 2).
Table 2

Detailed information of lymph node metastasis in nine CLM patients

NoGenderAgeTumor size (cm)PathologyDifferentiationTNM stageN of LNMIntermediate bronchus invasionPulmonary vascular invasionIntermediate bronchus LNMRLL LNMRML N12 metastasisRML N13 metastasis
1M455.6SCCMT2N13YesNoYesYesNoYes
2M575.2SCCMT2N12YesNoYesNoYesNo
3M647SCCMT2N212NoNoYesYesNoYes
4M647.5ADPT3N26NoNoYesYesNoYes
5M695.9SCCMT2N26YesNoYesYesNoYes
6M641.8ADMT2N28YesNoNoYesNoYes
7M512.5SCLCPT1N211YesNoNoYesYesNo
8M614SCCMT2N23YesYesYesNoNoYes
9M627.5SCCMT3N12YesNoNoNoNoYes

AD, adenocarcinoma; CLM, cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis; LNM, lymph node metastasis; M, moderately differentiated; P, poorly differentiated; RLL, right lower lobe; RML, right middle lobe; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Detailed information of lymph node metastasis in nine CLM patients AD, adenocarcinoma; CLM, cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis; LNM, lymph node metastasis; M, moderately differentiated; P, poorly differentiated; RLL, right lower lobe; RML, right middle lobe; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer. Patients were divided into two groups according to LN metastasis: CLM and non‐CLM. After comparing the clinical characteristics of the patients, we found that in the CLM group, tumors were all located in the lower lobe (100% vs. 91.5%; P = 0.42); and tumor diameter (5.2 vs. 3.2; P = 0.28), N2 LN metastasis rate (66.7% vs. 28.8%; P = 0.03), late stage (IIIa 77.8% vs. 35.6%; P = 0.04), and invasion of the intermediate bronchus (77.8% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.07) relatively increased (Table 3). Furthermore, the difference in histological type (P = 0.58), invasion of the visceral pleura (33.3% vs. 23.7%; P = 0.53), or invasion of hilar vessels (11.1% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.84) was not statistically significant.
Table 3

Clinicopathologic features of patients with or without CLM

VariablesNon‐CLM (n = 59)CLM (n = 9) P
Age
Median (Range)59 (27–82)62 (45–69)
< 593152.5%333.3%0.28
> 602847.5%666.7%
Gender
Male4983.1%9100.0%0.18
Female1016.9%00.0%
Histology type
SCC4169.5%666.7%0.58
AD813.6%222.2%
SCLC35.1%111.1%
Other type711.9%00.0%
Size of tumor
Median (range)3.2 (0.6–11)5.2 (1.8–7.5)0.28
< 32440.7%222.2%
> 33559.3%777.8%
Differentiation
Poor2135.6%222.2%0.33
Moderate2644.1%777.8%
Well35.1%00.0%
Lesion location
Middle L46.8%00.0%0.42
Lower L5491.5%9100.0%
Intermediate bronchus invasion
Yes2745.8%777.8%0.07
No3254.2%222.2%
Pulmonary vascular invasion
Yes813.6%111.1%0.84
No5186.4%888.9%
Visceral pleura invasion
Yes1423.7%333.3%0.53
No4576.3%666.7%
Intermediate bronchus LNM
Yes2644.1%666.7%0.2
No3355.9%333.3%
Primary lobe N13 metastasis
Yes2745.8%666.7%0.24
No3254.2%333.3%
N2 lymph node metastasis
Yes1728.8%666.7%0.03
No4271.2%333.3%
Stage
I1627.1%00.0%0.04
II2237.3%222.2%
IIIa2135.6%777.8%

AD, adenocarcinoma; CLM, cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis; LNM, lymph node metastasis; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Clinicopathologic features of patients with or without CLM AD, adenocarcinoma; CLM, cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis; LNM, lymph node metastasis; SCC, squamous cell cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer. Among N positive patients, the proportion of invasion of the intermediate bronchus was significantly higher in the CLM than in the non‐CLM group (77.8% vs. 47.5%; P = 0.10), and the N2 LN metastasis rate was also higher (66.7% vs/ 42.5%; P = 0.19) (Table 4).
Table 4

Clinicopathologic features of N positive patients with or without CLM

FeatureNon‐CLM (n = 40)CLM (n = 9) P
Size of tumor
Median
< 31435.0%222.2%0.46
> 32665.0%777.8%
Intermediate bronchus invasion
Yes1947.5%777.8%0.1
No2152.5%222.2%
Intermediate bronchus LNM
Yes2665.0%666.7%0.92
No1435.0%333.3%
Same lobe N13 metastasis
Yes2767.5%666.7%0.96
No1332.5%333.3%
N2 LNM
Yes1742.5%666.7%0.19
No2357.5%333.3%
Stage
II1947.5%222.2%0.17
III2152.5%777.8%

LNM, lymph node metastasis.

Clinicopathologic features of N positive patients with or without CLM LNM, lymph node metastasis.

Discussion

Lymph node metastasis from lung cancer has been widely recognized for a long time. Tumor cells metastasize sequentially to occupy one lobe or skip to the same lobe of the peripheral and/or hilar and mediastinal LNs, but do not transfer to other LNs within the lung. This is also the basic theoretical foundation of standard lung cancer lobectomy. However, in clinical practice, using resected specimens from the right middle and lower lobes (bilobectomy), LN metastasis was continually detected in scans in the peripheral zone of the middle lobe, even though the tumor did not invade the parenchyma of the right middle lung. In this study, among the 68 patients who underwent bilobectomy, nine patients had CLM, accounting for 13.2%. Among these, seven patients had LN metastasis in the segmental/sub‐segmental stations (stations 13–14), two had LN metastasis in the lobar station (station 12), and two had multiple CLM, indicating that CLM is a universal phenomenon. There are no previous related reports because lobes without lesions are not resected during surgery. Therefore, there is a lack of observable research objects. Another reason may be that peripheral LNs (stations 12–14), as well as the hilar and interlobar zone LNs (stations 10/11), both belong to the N1 station.1, 9 When LN metastasis in other N1 areas exists, whether LN metastasis occurs in station 12–14 does not affect staging and treatment, and thus, it does not attract sufficient research attention. How tumor cells move from the lower lobe into LNs in the middle lobe is an interesting question. Because tumors do not directly invade the middle lobe parenchyma and visceral pleura, they are unlikely to transfer from middle lobe parenchyma to the peripheral LNs. All CLM patients in our study had LN metastasis in other stations, and 67% of patients had LN metastasis in the intermediate bronchus. Therefore, we believe that metastasis to the peripheral LN of the middle lobe occurs through the lymphatic pathway (Fig 1). The pathway may be from the tumor to the peripheral LN of the lower lobe, and to the intermediate bronchial LNs (middle and lower lobe lymphatic pathway convergence station), which then retrogrades to the middle LN. It is noteworthy that 67% of CLM patients had mediastinal LN metastasis in the N2 area, which was significantly higher than in the non‐CLM group at 29%. This may be a result of the distant metastasis pathway, which needs to go through multiple LNs. Therefore, tumors in CLM patients were relatively large (5.2 cm vs. 3.2 cm), and patients were at relatively late stages of the disease (stage IIIa 78% vs. 36%). Compared to other cases of LN metastasis, invasion of the intermediate bronchus in the CLM group was significantly higher (78% vs. 48%; P = 0.10).
Figure 1

Cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis (CLM). (a) CLM‐tumor located in the right lower lobe and peripheral lymph node metastasis in the right middle lobe. (b) Lymph node metastasis pattern. Red arrow: traditional pathway; blue arrow: CLM pathway.

Cross‐lobe lymph node metastasis (CLM). (a) CLM‐tumor located in the right lower lobe and peripheral lymph node metastasis in the right middle lobe. (b) Lymph node metastasis pattern. Red arrow: traditional pathway; blue arrow: CLM pathway. In order to retain greater respiratory function, when the tumor only invades the intermediate bronchus without invading the middle lobe bronchus and parenchyma, the surgeon can choose sleeve resection to retain the middle lobe.10, 11 However, more than a quarter of patients in this study with LN metastasis, especially those with N2 LN metastasis, had metastatic tumor cells left in the middle lobe, thus radical resection cannot be achieved. Kim et al. reported that the local recurrence rate in patients who underwent sleeve resection was significantly higher than in patients who underwent lung resection (57% vs. 31%).12 Furthermore, Schirren et al. reported that the local recurrence rate of sleeve resection is higher than in pneumonectomy (3.2% vs. 0%).13 As previously discussed, sleeve resection has a high local recurrence rate, mainly because of the insufficient cutting edge distance. However, the results of our study suggest that CLM caused non‐radical surgery, which might be another important reason for recurrence. How to detect peripheral LN metastasis before surgery is a difficult and unpopular question. Methods used to detect metastasis of the mediastinal LNs include mediastinoscopic lymph node biopsy, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT).14, 15, 16 Metastasized LNs in the peripheral zone are much smaller than in the mediastinal zone, and most are < 0.5 cm. Current PET‐CT and EBUS‐TBNA examinations have limitations for detecting and estimating metastatic LNs of sub‐centimeter size.17, 18 This study has some limitations. First, our study was restricted to metastasis of right lower lobe tumors to the LN in the right middle lobe. We did not determine whether CLM exists in other lobes. Second, there were a limited number of samples in our study. Because this study was retrospective, surgical specimens needed to be carefully reviewed and we only enrolled patients with adequate specimens. Finally, whether this phenomenon directly affects staging and prognosis remains unclear. We will conduct long‐term follow‐up of this group of patients to seek relevant answers. Whether metastasis exists in LNs within the non‐primary lobe in early stage lung cancer patients has long been a blind spot of clinical studies. This study is the first to present the CLM phenomenon, and it is hoped this will attract further attention from surgeons and tumor experts.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  18 in total

1.  The utility of sonographic features during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lymph node staging in patients with lung cancer: a standard endobronchial ultrasound image classification system.

Authors:  Taiki Fujiwara; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Takahiro Nakajima; Masako Chiyo; Shigetoshi Yoshida; Makoto Suzuki; Kiyoshi Shibuya; Kenzo Hiroshima; Yukio Nakatani; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Sleeve lobectomy as an alternative procedure to pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joon Suk Park; Hee Chul Yang; Hong Kwan Kim; Kwhanmien Kim; Young Mog Shim; Yong Soo Choi; Jhingook Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Pneumonectomy vs. sleeve resection for non-small cell lung carcinoma in the elderly: analysis of short-term and long-term results.

Authors:  S Bölükbas; M H Eberlein; J Schirren
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Authors:  Valerie W Rusch; Hisao Asamura; Hirokazu Watanabe; Dorothy J Giroux; Ramon Rami-Porta; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 5.  International association for the study of lung cancer (IASLC) lymph node map: radiologic review with CT illustration.

Authors:  Ahmed H El-Sherief; Charles T Lau; Carol C Wu; Richard L Drake; Gerald F Abbott; Thomas W Rice
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Skip mediastinal nodal metastases in the IIIa/N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nenad Ilic; Ante Petricevic; Dragan Arar; Slavica Kotarac; Josip Banovic; Nives Frleta Ilic; Andro Tripkovic; Leo Grandic
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Limitations of PET/CT in the Detection of Occult N1 Metastasis in Clinical Stage I(T1-2aN0) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Staging Prior to Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Adil S Akthar; Mark K Ferguson; Matthew Koshy; Wickii T Vigneswaran; Renuka Malik
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 8.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Gu; Yi-Zhuo Zhao; Li-Yan Jiang; Wei Zhang; Yu Xin; Bao-Hui Han
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  The prognostic significance of intranodal isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Alberto M Marchevsky; Jian-Huan Qiao; Sanja Krajisnik; James M Mirocha; Robert J McKenna
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Woda Shi; Wei Zhang; Haoliang Sun; Yongfeng Shao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk factors of lobar lymph node metastases in non-primary tumor-bearing lobes among the patients of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jingwei Liu; Jian Li; Gang Lin; Zhiqiang Long; Qian Li; Bing Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Lymph node metastasis outside of a tumor-bearing lobe in primary lung cancer and the status of interlobar fissures: The necessity for removing lymph nodes from an adjacent lobe.

Authors:  Hui Li; Ruimin Wang; Dexian Zhang; Yongming Zhang; Wanhu Li; Baijiang Zhang; Qi Liu; Jiajun Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Lymph node metastases outside tumor-bearing lobes and/or segments in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lu Han; Hui Jia; Pingping Song; Xibin Liu; Zhendan Wang; Dujian Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.