Literature DB >> 29517860

CEP72-ROS1: A novel ROS1 oncogenic fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma identified by next-generation sequencing.

You-Cai Zhu1, Yue-Fen Zhou2, Wen-Xian Wang3, Chun-Wei Xu4, Wu Zhuang5, Kai-Qi Du1, Gang Chen3.   

Abstract

ROS1 rearrangement is a validated therapeutic driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and represents a small subset (1-2%) of NSCLC. A total of 17 different fusion partner genes of ROS1 in NSCLC have been reported. The multi-targeted MET/ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Consequently, ROS1 detection assays include fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and real-time PCR. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay covers a range of fusion genes and approaches to discover novel receptor-kinase rearrangements in lung cancer. A 63-year-old male smoker with stage IV NSCLC (TxNxM1) was detected with a novel ROS1 fusion. Histological examination of the tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma. NGS analysis of the hydrothorax cellblocks revealed a novel CEP72-ROS1 rearrangement. This novel CEP72-ROS1 fusion variant is generated by the fusion of exons 1-11 of CEP72 on chromosome 5p15 to exons 23-43 of ROS1 on chromosome 6q22. The predicted CEP72-ROS1 protein product contains 1202 amino acids comprising the N-terminal amino acids 594-647 of CEP72 and C-terminal amino acid 1-1148 of ROS1. CEP72-ROS1 is a novel ROS1 fusion variant in NSCLC discovered by NGS and could be included in ROS1 detection assay, such as reverse transcription PCR. Pleural effusion samples show good diagnostic performance in clinical practice.
© 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Adenocarcinoma; zzm321990NGS; zzm321990ROS1; lung; rearrangement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29517860      PMCID: PMC5928353          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

Lung cancer morbidity and mortality are increasing in both developed and developing countries worldwide.1, 2 Oncogenic ROS1 rearrangements have become an established molecular target in lung cancer. ROS1 rearrangements are identified in 1–2% of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.3 NSCLC was the second solid tumor found to harbor ROS1 rearrangement. Nowadays, a total of 17 ROS1 fusion partner genes have been reported, including CD74, SLC34A2, GOPC, CCDC6, SDC4, TPM3, EZR, LRIG3, KDELR2, LIMA1, MSN, CLTC, TPD52L1, TMEM106B, FAM135B, and SLC6A17.4, 5, 6, 7 In general, we use surgery or percutaneous lung biopsies to detect gene status. However, in some cases, we are unable to obtain tumor tissue. Approaches for examining molecular biomarkers in body fluids, such as effusion or serum, may be clinically helpful for predicting the response to TKI treatment. Crizotinib, an ALK/ROS1/MET inhibitor, was the first targeted agent approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for the treatment of advanced ROS1‐rearraged NSCLC based on a phase I crizotinib trial. It demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 72% and median progression‐free survival (PFS) of 19.2 months in advanced ROS1‐rearranged NSCLC.8 Because of precise detection assays, such as next‐generation sequencing (NGS), more and more novel ROS1 fusion partner genes are being identified in lung cancer. However, the clinical significance of these variants requires further investigation. The efficacy of crizotinib treatment in some of the abovementioned ROS1 rearrangements has not yet been reported. Herein, we report a novel ROS1‐rearranged (CEP72ROS1) NSCLC fusion variant in a smoking patient who presented with malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma (stage IV).

Case report

Our case involves a 63‐year old male smoker (> 100 pack‐year) with a one‐week history of chest distress and dyspnea. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC (malignant pleural effusion) in December 2014. We found adenocarcinoma cells from pleural effusion. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of pleural effusion analysis demonstrated positivity in TTF‐1 and negativity in CK 5/6 and P63. We detected the gene mutation status of the pleural effusion, which showed wild‐type epidermal growth factor receptor variants using an amplification refractory mutation system and ALK gene negative using reverse transcription PCR assay (AmoyDx, Xiamen, China). NGS analysis of the hydrothorax cellblocks revealed a novel CEP72ROS1 rearrangement (Geneplus, Beijing, China). This novel CEP72ROS1 fusion variant is generated by the fusion of exons 1–11 of CEP72 on chromosome 5p15 to exons 23–43 of ROS1 on chromosome 6q22. The predicted CEP72ROS1 protein product contains 1202 amino acids comprising N‐terminal amino acids 594–647 of CEP72 and C‐terminal amino acid 1‐1148 of ROS1 (Fig 1).
Figure 1

Paired‐end sequencing data indicated somatic intrachromosomal (a) CEP72 and (b) ROS1, demonstrated by Integrative Genomics Viewer program. (c) Schematic representation of the translocation involving CEP72 and ROS1 and the predicted domains of the CEP72‐ROS1 fusion protein.

Paired‐end sequencing data indicated somatic intrachromosomal (a) CEP72 and (b) ROS1, demonstrated by Integrative Genomics Viewer program. (c) Schematic representation of the translocation involving CEP72 and ROS1 and the predicted domains of the CEP72ROS1 fusion protein. Unfortunately, the patient experienced disease progression but could not be treated with chemotherapy because of decreased performance status or with ROS1 inhibitors because of the cost, and thus died shortly after.

Discussion

To our knowledge, CEP72ROS1 fusion in lung cancer has not previously been reported, thus this is the first report of novel ROS1 fusion. CEP72 is located on chromosome 5p15 and contains 12 exons. The product of this gene is a member of the LRR superfamily of proteins, including 647‐amino acid. The protein is localized to the centrosome, a non‐membranous organelle that plays critical roles in microtubule organization, cell division, and cilium formation.9 The CEP72 protein contains a “coiled‐coil” domain (476–620 aa) that is common among the fusion protein partners of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) rearranged NSCLC. Functionally, CEP72 has been linked to genetic modifiers of ubiquitin‐positive frontotemporal dementia (UP‐FTD) and frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 1 (FTDALS1). Interestingly, the TMEM106B gene, which has been linked as a genetic modifier of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), is also reported to be translocated to proto‐oncogene tyrosine‐protein kinase (ROS1) in ROS1‐rearranged NSCLC,5 and the HIP1 gene is reported to be translocated to ALK in ALK‐rearranged NSCLC at three different breakpoints.10 Three genes, CEP72, TMEM106B, and HIP1, were all related to various neurological diseases; whether ALK and ROS1 rearranged NSCLC patients with these fusion protein partners present with certain unique clinicopathological characteristics remains to be determined. ROS1 testing in NSCLC samples is often only considered after the patient is determined as negative for EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement.11 Nowadays, ROS1 is a validated therapeutic target for NSCLC. In a phase I study, the multi‐targeted MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ROS1‐rearranged NSCLCs, and consequently gained approval by the US FDA. Testing for the ROS1 gene in advanced NSCLC should be routine. There are currently no approved companion assays for ROS1 fusion NSCLC. Based on experience with ALK, commonly used methods for ROS1 fusion detection include fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR), and NGS.12 Developments in NGS have created a new method for the simultaneous detection of a large number of gene fusions with known and unknown genes and gene mutations.13, 14 We thought the types of ROS1 fusion were various and IHC assay was a prescreening test.15 In addition, NGS could identify novel fusions and increase the list of actionable variants for NSCLC patients. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) presents in approximately 50% of patients with advanced NSCLC. MPEs often contain tumor cells and biomarkers and can represent an alternative to tumor tissues in clinical practice. PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization have successfully detected EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements in MPE samples, respectively.15, 16, 17 In our case, ROS1 fusion was detected in MPE using NGS, demonstrating that MPE detection is a feasible method to detect ROS1 gene status. In the future, it is worth exploring the use of MPE for ROS1 or other gene detection in NSCLC patients and the predictive value of MPE‐based detection for clinical use. The results of this case report create awareness of a novel type of ROS1 translocation in NSCLC patients. NGS assay could provide a novel diagnostic approach. Research into the biology of different ROS1‐driven lung cancers for the development of new therapeutic strategies is required.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  17 in total

1.  Identification of a novel HIP1-ALK fusion variant in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and discovery of ALK I1171 (I1171N/S) mutations in two ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with resistance to Alectinib.

Authors:  Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Samuel J Klempner; Joel R Greenbowe; Michele Azada; Alexa B Schrock; Siraj M Ali; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers.

Authors:  Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Nerina T McDonald; Pierre P Massion; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Adriana Gonzalez; Rong Fang; Eugene J Mark; Julie M Batten; Haiquan Chen; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Carbone; Hongbin Ji; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; William Pao; A John Iafrate
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Identification of a novel TMEM106B-ROS1 fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma by comprehensive genomic profiling.

Authors:  Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Zachary R Chalmers; Michele C Azada; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Siraj M Ali; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Detection of ALK rearrangements in malignant pleural effusion cell blocks from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of Ventana immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Weiya Wang; Yuan Tang; Jinnan Li; Lili Jiang; Yong Jiang; Xueying Su
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Identification of EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, and ALK gene rearrangement in cytological specimens of primary and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guoping Cai; Rebecca Wong; David Chhieng; Gillian H Levy; Scott N Gettinger; Roy S Herbst; Jonathan T Puchalski; Robert J Homer; Pei Hui
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Clinical Implications of Variant ALK FISH Rearrangement Patterns.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Lynette M Sholl; Mizuki Nishino; Jennifer C Heng; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  The centriolar satellite proteins Cep72 and Cep290 interact and are required for recruitment of BBS proteins to the cilium.

Authors:  Timothy R Stowe; Christopher J Wilkinson; Anila Iqbal; Tim Stearns
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 9.  Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Bubendorf; Reinhard Büttner; Fouad Al-Dayel; Manfred Dietel; Göran Elmberger; Keith Kerr; Fernando López-Ríos; Antonio Marchetti; Büge Öz; Patrick Pauwels; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Giulio Rossi; Aleš Ryška; Erik Thunnissen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak H Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M Devlin; Matthew D Hellmann; David A Barron; Alison M Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S Ross; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Deborah F DeLair; JinJuan Yao; Diana L Mandelker; Donavan T Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita S Mohanty; Ryan N Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa; Laetitia Borsu; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Ruben Bacares; Iwona J Kiecka; Anna Razumova; Julie B Son; Lisa Stewart; Tessara Baldi; Kerry A Mullaney; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Efsevia Vakiani; Adam A Abeshouse; Alexander V Penson; Philip Jonsson; Niedzica Camacho; Matthew T Chang; Helen H Won; Benjamin E Gross; Ritika Kundra; Zachary J Heins; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Sarah Phillips; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Angelica Ochoa; Jonathan Wills; Michael Eubank; Stacy B Thomas; Stuart M Gardos; Dalicia N Reales; Jesse Galle; Robert Durany; Roy Cambria; Wassim Abida; Andrea Cercek; Darren R Feldman; Mrinal M Gounder; A Ari Hakimi; James J Harding; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Emmet J Jordan; Ciara M Kelly; Maeve A Lowery; Luc G T Morris; Antonio M Omuro; Nitya Raj; Pedram Razavi; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Tara E Soumerai; Anna M Varghese; Rona Yaeger; Jonathan Coleman; Bernard Bochner; Gregory J Riely; Leonard B Saltz; Howard I Scher; Paul J Sabbatini; Mark E Robson; David S Klimstra; Barry S Taylor; Jose Baselga; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  9 in total

1.  The potential and limitation of targeted chromosomal breakpoint sequencing for the ROS1 fusion gene identification in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Szu Hung; Yu-Ching Lin; Fen-Fen Chen; Yuan-Yuan Jiang; Yu-Hung Fang; Ming-Shian Lu; Chin-Kuo Lin; Tsung-Ming Yang; Jrhau Lung; Chih-Cheng Chen; Kuan-Der Lee; Ying-Huang Tsai
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 5.942

2.  A Novel ROS1-FBXL17 Fusion Co-Existing with CD74-ROS1 Fusion May Improve Sensitivity to Crizotinib and Prolong Progression-Free Survival of Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shaowei Lan; Hui Li; Ying Liu; Jinhua Xu; Zhicheng Huang; Shi Yan; Qiang Zhang; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A novel co-existing ZCCHC8-ROS1 and de-novo MET amplification dual driver in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with a good response to crizotinib.

Authors:  You-Cai Zhu; Wen-Xian Wang; Chun-Wei Xu; Wu Zhuang; Zheng-Bo Song; Kai-Qi Du; Gang Chen; Tang-Feng Lv; Yong Song
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  ROS-1 Fusions in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Evidence to Date.

Authors:  Sébastien Gendarme; Olivier Bylicki; Christos Chouaid; Florian Guisier
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  OPRM1-ROS1 Fusion Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing with Circulating DNA in a Patient with EGFR Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sicai Zhang; Zhiyong Xu; Weimin Zhang
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 6.  ROS1-dependent cancers - biology, diagnostics and therapeutics.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Chelsea Jenkins; Sudarshan Iyer; Adam Schoenfeld; Clare Keddy; Monika A Davare
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Current and Future Molecular Testing in NSCLC, What Can We Expect from New Sequencing Technologies?

Authors:  Simon Garinet; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Hélène Blons; Jean-Baptiste Oudart
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Multiplexed molecular profiling of lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion using next generation sequencing in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Xingya Ruan; Yonghua Sun; Wei Wang; Jianwei Ye; Daoyun Zhang; Ziying Gong; Mingxia Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  A case of lung adenocarcinoma with a novel CD74-ROS1 fusion variant identified by comprehensive genomic profiling that responded to crizotinib and entrectinib.

Authors:  Mizuha Haraguchi Hashiguchi; Takashi Sato; Rinako Watanabe; Junko Kagyo; Tomohiko Matsuzaki; Hideharu Domoto; Terufumi Kato; Yoshiro Nakahara; Tomoyuki Yokose; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Tetsuya Shiomi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.