Josephine Me Gibson1,2, Lois H Thomas3, Joanna J Harrison1, Caroline L Watkins1,2. 1. School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. 2. National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast, Preston, UK. 3. School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the views and experiences of stroke survivors and carers about a systematic voiding programme for poststroke incontinence. BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence after stroke is common and associated with poorer functional outcome. Structured assessment and management are potentially effective interventions, but it is important that there is a good understanding of stroke survivors' and carers' views of their acceptability and implementation. DESIGN: A qualitative study within a feasibility trial. METHODS: Sixteen participants (12 stroke survivors and four carers) were interviewed using a structured schedule shortly before discharge from one of six inpatient stroke units across six hospitals. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted. FINDINGS: Participants included seven male and five female stroke survivors (mean age 76 years) and four female carers (two wives and two daughters). Themes relating to the preliminary (assessment) phase of the programme were as follows: physical impact, psychological impact, beliefs about incontinence, and the assessment process itself. Main themes relating to the implementation of the programme included the following: timed voiding decisions, adapting the programme or the timed voiding schedule, and urinary incontinence management techniques. Participants felt that the programme helped them to re-establish a regular pattern of micturition and to regain autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme may partly lie in its educational component, challenging patients' and carers' assumptions that poststroke incontinence is inevitable. Individual adaptation of the programme and the ability to incorporate it alongside other aspects of care are likely to be key factors influencing implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Urinary incontinence is common after stroke. To maximise benefits from a systematic voiding programme, nurses should support stroke survivors to overturn erroneous beliefs, to participate in tailoring of the programme, and in self-management where appropriate.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the views and experiences of stroke survivors and carers about a systematic voiding programme for poststroke incontinence. BACKGROUND:Urinary incontinence after stroke is common and associated with poorer functional outcome. Structured assessment and management are potentially effective interventions, but it is important that there is a good understanding of stroke survivors' and carers' views of their acceptability and implementation. DESIGN: A qualitative study within a feasibility trial. METHODS: Sixteen participants (12 stroke survivors and four carers) were interviewed using a structured schedule shortly before discharge from one of six inpatient stroke units across six hospitals. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted. FINDINGS:Participants included seven male and five female stroke survivors (mean age 76 years) and four female carers (two wives and two daughters). Themes relating to the preliminary (assessment) phase of the programme were as follows: physical impact, psychological impact, beliefs about incontinence, and the assessment process itself. Main themes relating to the implementation of the programme included the following: timed voiding decisions, adapting the programme or the timed voiding schedule, and urinary incontinence management techniques. Participants felt that the programme helped them to re-establish a regular pattern of micturition and to regain autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme may partly lie in its educational component, challenging patients' and carers' assumptions that poststroke incontinence is inevitable. Individual adaptation of the programme and the ability to incorporate it alongside other aspects of care are likely to be key factors influencing implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Urinary incontinence is common after stroke. To maximise benefits from a systematic voiding programme, nurses should support stroke survivors to overturn erroneous beliefs, to participate in tailoring of the programme, and in self-management where appropriate.
Authors: Chris Du; Wai Lee; Dena Moskowitz; Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi; Una J Lee Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 2.894