Dear editor, the publication on Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak is very interesting. Borges raised an
interesting question: "Should assisted reproduction patients avoid
pregnancy?" Borges concluded that the "ZIKV test before the onset of assisted
reproduction treatment does not rule out the risk of the infection during
pregnancy" and "In addition, although ZIKVinfection risk is
extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of
miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens." We would
like to share ideas and discuss this topic. First, we agree that the Zika virus test
before pregnancy does not add any usefulness in prevention of the infection during
pregnancy. The standard prevention against the Zika virus (mosquito prevention, sexual
abstinence, avoidance of visiting the outbreak area, etc.) should be followed by all
pregnant women. Second, we agree that the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV might not be
high and severe. In our settings, a country in the tropical Southeast Asia are, the
disease already exists but most infections are asymptomatic and there is no confirmed
congenital case of microcephaly as a result of ZIKV in pregnant mother (Wiwanitkit & Wiwanitkit, 2016). Based on this
from our settings, it is concluded that there is no need for either the general
population or assisted reproduction patients to avoid pregnancy; nevertheless, the
standard prevention methods must be followed by all.