AIM: Previous studies have shown adverse obstetric outcomes of the laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn. Our study aimed to investigate the obstetric outcome in our institution and to review previous studies. METHODS: Using a retrospective analysis, data were reviewed from singleton pregnancies with maternal uterine anomalies at a medical center in Osaka, Japan, between January 2011 and March 2016. The uterine anomaly cases were divided into a 'postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn' group (study group) and an 'other uterine anomalies' (bicornuate uterus, uterine didelphys and unicornuate uterus) group (control group). Primary outcomes of interest were differences in obstetric outcomes, such as spontaneous preterm birth rate, small for gestational age (SGA) infant rate and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) rate between the study and the control group, and the secondary outcome of interest was mode of delivery in the study group. RESULTS: Data from 40 deliveries were included in the study (7 deliveries: study group, 33 deliveries: control group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of either mean gestational weeks at delivery (36.4 weeks vs 37.1 weeks; P = .38), cesarean delivery rate (57.1% vs 57.5%; P = 1.0), SGA infant rate (<10th percentile) (0% vs 24.2%; P = .31) and HDP rate (0.0% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0). Three of seven cases with postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn were able to deliver vaginally without complications. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the obstetric outcome observed in the study group was similar to that observed in the control group.
AIM: Previous studies have shown adverse obstetric outcomes of the laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn. Our study aimed to investigate the obstetric outcome in our institution and to review previous studies. METHODS: Using a retrospective analysis, data were reviewed from singleton pregnancies with maternal uterine anomalies at a medical center in Osaka, Japan, between January 2011 and March 2016. The uterine anomaly cases were divided into a 'postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn' group (study group) and an 'other uterine anomalies' (bicornuate uterus, uterine didelphys and unicornuate uterus) group (control group). Primary outcomes of interest were differences in obstetric outcomes, such as spontaneous preterm birth rate, small for gestational age (SGA) infant rate and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) rate between the study and the control group, and the secondary outcome of interest was mode of delivery in the study group. RESULTS: Data from 40 deliveries were included in the study (7 deliveries: study group, 33 deliveries: control group). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of either mean gestational weeks at delivery (36.4 weeks vs 37.1 weeks; P = .38), cesarean delivery rate (57.1% vs 57.5%; P = 1.0), SGA infant rate (<10th percentile) (0% vs 24.2%; P = .31) and HDP rate (0.0% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0). Three of seven cases with postlaparoscopic resection of the rudimentary horn were able to deliver vaginally without complications. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the obstetric outcome observed in the study group was similar to that observed in the control group.