| Literature DB >> 29515609 |
Encarni Montoya1,2, Hayley F Keen1, Carmen X Luzuriaga3, William D Gosling1,4.
Abstract
Tropical ecosystems play a key role in many aspects of Earth system dynamics currently of global concern, including carbon sequestration and biodiversity. To accurately understand complex tropical systems it is necessary to parameterise key ecological aspects, such as rates of change (RoC), species turnover, dynamism, resilience, or stability. To obtain a long-term (>50 years) perspective on these ecological aspects we must turn to the fossil record. However, compared to temperate zones, collecting continuous sedimentary archives in the lowland tropics is often difficult due to the active landscape processes, with potentially frequent volcanic, tectonic, and/or fluvial events confounding sediment deposition, preservation, and recovery. Consequently, the nature, and drivers, of vegetation dynamics during the last glacial are barely known from many non-montane tropical landscapes. One of the first lowland Amazonian locations from which palaeoecological data were obtained was an outcrop near Mera (Ecuador). Mera was discovered, and analysed, by Paul Colinvaux in the 1980s, but his interpretation of the data as indicative of a forested glacial period were criticised based on the ecology and age control. Here we present new palaeoecological data from a lake located less than 10 km away from Mera. Sediment cores raised from Laguna Pindo (1250 masl; 1°27'S, 78°05'W) have been shown to span the late last glacial period [50-13 cal kyr BP (calibrated kiloyears before present)]. The palaeoecological information obtained from Laguna Pindo indicate that the region was characterised by a relatively stable plant community, formed by taxa nowadays common at both mid and high elevations. Miconia was the dominant taxon until around 30 cal kyr BP, when it was replaced by Hedyosmum, Asteraceae and Ilex among other taxa. Heat intolerant taxa including Podocarpus, Alnus, and Myrica peaked around the onset of the Last Glacial Maximum (c. 21 cal kyr BP). The results obtained from Laguna Pindo support Colinvaux's hypothesis that glacial cooling resulted in a reshuffling of taxa in the region but did not lead to a loss of the forest structure. Wide tolerances of the plant species occurring to glacial temperature range and cloud formation have been suggested to explain Pindo forest stability. This scenario is radically different than the present situation, so vulnerability of the tropical pre-montane forest is highlighted to be increased in the next decades.Entities:
Keywords: Last Glacial Maximum; diversity dynamics; eastern Andean flank; neotropics; palaeoecology; stability; vulnerability; western equatorial Amazonia
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515609 PMCID: PMC5826276 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
List of main vegetation taxa currently present surrounding Laguna Pindo based on rough field survey by C. X. Luzuriaga in 2013 and Luzuriaga (2007).
| Taxon | Family | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Euphorbiaceae | Tree | |
| Lauracea | Tree | |
| Araceae | Epiphyte | |
| Meliaceae | Tree | |
| Maranthaceae | Herb | |
| Cecropiaceae | Tree | |
| Bombacaceae | Tree | |
| Ulmaceae | Tree | |
| Clusiaceae | Hemiepiphyte | |
| Boraginaceae | Tree | |
| Costaceae | Herb | |
| Euphorbiaceae | Tree | |
| Burseraceae | Tree | |
| Myrtaceae | Tree | |
| Poaceae | Tree | |
| Heliconiaceae | Herb | |
| Mimosaceae | Tree | |
| Mimosaceae | Tree | |
| Flacourtiaceae | Tree | |
| Caesalpiniaceae | Tree | |
| Bombacaceae | Tree | |
| Melastomataceae | Shrub–treelet–tree | |
| Melastomataceae | Shrub–tree | |
| Melastomataceae | Shrub–treelet–tree | |
| Melastomataceae | Shrub–treelet–tree | |
| Lauracea | Tree | |
| Lauracea | Tree | |
| Myristicaceae | Tree | |
| Rubiaceae | Tree | |
| Piperaceae | Shrub–treelet | |
| Asteraceae | Tree | |
| Cecropiaceae | Tree | |
| Sapotaceae | Tree | |
| Euphorbiaceae | Tree | |
| Caesalpiniaceae | Tree | |
| Monimiaceae | Shrub–tree | |
| Arecaceae | Tree | |
| Actinidiaceae | Shrub–treelet | |
| Myrtaceae | Tree | |
| Ulmaceae | Tree | |
| Staphyleaceae | Tree | |
| Caprifoliaceae | Shrub | |
| Clusiaceae | Tree | |
| Vochysiaceae | Tree | |
| Arecaceae | Tree | |
| Araceae | Herb | |
| Rutaceae | Tree |
Conventional (yr BP) and calibrated (cal kyr BP) radiocarbon data used in construction of chronologies for Laguna Pindo.
| Publication code | Depth (cm) | δ13CV PDB (‰)∗ | 14C age (yr BP) | Calendar age (cal kyr BP) 2σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUERC-54395b | 46 | -30.2 | 334 ± 42 | 289–470 |
| SUERC-47634b | 117 | -27.9 | 974 ± 36 | 769–923 |
| SUERC-47635b | 245 | -27.3 | 1973 ± 39 | 1812–1943 |
| SUERC-47569b | 329 | -24.9 | 2335 ± 37 | 2293–2361 |
| SUERC-47572b | 410 | -22.7 | 2829 ± 39 | 2781–2991 |
| SUERC-48854a | 461 | -28.7 | 3974 ± 45 | 4241–4447 |
| SUERC-54385a | 483 | -27.9 | 4518 ± 40 | 4969–5300 |
| SUERC-54386a | 504 | -27.8 | 5641 ± 39 | 6298–6454 |
| SUERC-54387a | 510 | -27.4 | 6029 ± 42 | 6717–6946 |
| SUERC-61456a | 512 | -28.4 | 7897 ± 41 | 8542–8784 |
| SUERC-61457a | 514 | -28.1 | 11,697 ± 46 | 13,387–13,580 |
| SUERC-61458a | 517 | -28.0 | 13,945 ± 54 | 16,581–17,073 |
| SUERC-48855a | 521 | -28.0 | 13,982 ± 59 | 16,618–17,138 |
| SUERC-54388a | 551 | -28.1 | 20,153 ± 104 | 23,907–24,450 |
| SUERC-61459a | 579 | -29.5 | 28,332 ± 284 | 31,449–32,998 |
| SUERC-45933b | 605 | -23.6 | 33,417 ± 519 | 36,354–38,781 |
| SUERC-61505a | 660 | -29.2 | 39,406 ± 1086 | 41,942–45,129 |
| SUERC-56825b | 725 | -26.7 | 43,425 ± 1788 | 44,725–49,907 |
Sedimentary units defined for Laguna Pindo core including main features.
| Unit | Depth (cm) | Sediment | Colour | Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit 1 | 0–414 | Organic peat | 10YR-2/2 | The interval between 182 and 307 cm is characterised by numerous large wood remains |
| Within this interval, a tephra is preserved at 105–114 cm depth (colour: 2.5YR-2/2), dated around 850 years ago and likely originated from Tungurahua or Quilotoa volcanoes event ( | ||||
| Unit 2 | 414–482 | Organic clay | 2.5YR-3/3 | Gradual change to upper unit (Unit 1) |
| 2.5YR-3/1 | ||||
| Unit 3 | 482–601 | Light clay | 2.5YR-4/2 | Very gradual transition colours, from darker to the extremes to lighter in the medial zone. Sediment compacted |
| 2.5YR-5/2 | ||||
| 2.5YR-6/2 | ||||
| 2.5YR-5/4 | ||||
| Unit 4 | 601–850 | Organic clay | 10YR-2/2 | Compacted sediment with occasional large wood remains |
| 10YR-3/2 | ||||
| 10YR-4/2 | ||||
| 10YR-3/2 | ||||
| 10YR-4/2 | ||||
| Unit 5 | 850–924 | Inorganic clay | 2.5YR-5/2 | Highly compacted. XRF analysis of major elements located this sediment in a TAS diagram within the basalt domain ( |
| 2.5YR-6/1 | ||||
| 2.5YR-7/2 | ||||
| 2.5YR-6/1 | ||||
| 2.5YR-8/3 |
Ecological metrics of Laguna Pindo glacial vegetation based on pollen data: rates of change (RoC) were calculated following Urrego et al. (2009), and diversity indices (N0, N1, N2, and the ratio N2/N0) following Hill (1973).
| Age | RoC | N0 | N1 | N2 | N2/N0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13,487 | NA | 57 | 23.091 | 13.71 | 0.24 |
| 15,685 | 1.21 × 10-4 | 45 | 24.697 | 17.54 | 0.39 |
| 16,783 | 4.03 × 10-4 | 52 | 24.738 | 15.76 | 0.30 |
| 18,402 | 1.62 × 10-4 | 47 | 26.729 | 18.25 | 0.39 |
| 20,809 | 1.91 × 10-4 | 45 | 19.806 | 12.75 | 0.28 |
| 22,975 | 1.05 × 10-4 | 51 | 23.592 | 14.97 | 0.29 |
| 25,614 | 1.15 × 10-4 | 43 | 20.640 | 13.96 | 0.32 |
| 28,486 | 3.82 × 10-5 | 50 | 22.840 | 14.36 | 0.29 |
| 31,358 | 1.51 × 10-4 | 50 | 20.729 | 12.92 | 0.26 |
| 33,673 | 4.69 × 10-5 | 50 | 19.781 | 11.42 | 0.23 |
| 40,875 | 5.48 × 10-5 | 45 | 16.710 | 7.71 | 0.17 |
| 44,868 | 7.68 × 10-5 | 50 | 23.269 | 14.07 | 0.28 |
| 47,135 | 9.18 × 10-5 | 50 | 17.738 | 7.50 | 0.15 |
| 50,534 | 5.83 × 10-5 | 56 | 16.611 | 7.52 | 0.13 |
| 52,574 | 3.77 × 10-4 | 40 | 18.887 | 11.17 | 0.28 |