| Literature DB >> 29515460 |
Jun Cai1,2, Hongxia Yang3, Song Shi1,2, Guohua Zhong1,2, Xin Yi1,2.
Abstract
The sterile insect technique (SIT) may reduce pest populations by allowing sufficient amount of irradiation-induced sterile males to mate with wild females whilst maintaining mating ability comparable to wild males. Although the SIT methods are well understood, the optimal sterilizing dose and processing development stage for application vary among species. To ensure effective pest control programs, effects of irradiation on physiology, behavior, and gene function in the target species should be defined, however, little is known about irradiation effects in Bactrocera tau. Here, the effects of irradiation on rates of fecundity, egg hatch, eclosion, mating competitiveness, flight capability, morphology of reproductive organs, and yolk protein (YP) gene expression were studied. The results showed that rates of female fecundity and egg hatch decreased significantly (51 ± 19 to 0.06 ± 0.06 and 98.90 ± 1.01 to 0, respectively) when pupae were treated with >150 Gy irradiation. Flight capability and mating competitiveness were not significantly influenced at doses <250 Gy. Ovaries and fallopian tubes became smaller after irradiation, but there was no change in testes size. Finally, we found that expression of the YP gene was up-regulated by irradiation at 30 and 45 days post-emergence, but the mechanisms were unclear. Our study provides information on the determination of the optimal irradiation sterilizing dose in B. tau, and the effects of irradiation on physiology, morphology and gene expression that will facilitate an understanding of sub-lethal impacts of the SIT and expand its use to the control of other species.Entities:
Keywords: Bactrocera tau; morphological changes; optimal dose; sterile insect technique; yolk polypeptides
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515460 PMCID: PMC5826196 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Primers used for sequence amplification.
| Middle | 285 | yp-F1 | TGCHMAWGTTGCYGGTGCYGC |
| yp-R1 | ATRCCCATRTADRYRCGYTTGCC | ||
| yp-F2 | CGY RTCACHGBYYTGGATCC | ||
| yp-R2 | GA YTGGCNKSVACRGCRGGGAA | ||
| 5′ end | 899 | yp-5′-1 | CACGACCAATCCAGATAACATAC |
| yp-5′-2 | CCCTTTTCCTTAGCGAACATCTTA | ||
| 3′ end | 508 | yp-3′-1 | ACTTCTACGTCAACGGTCCAGC |
| yp-3′-2 | CCCTGGTGCTACCAATGTAATT | ||
| yp-q-F | ATCTGGATTGGCTCGTGGTG | ||
| qRT-PCR | yp-q-R | TTCATATTGGTCTATTGAGGTGGC | |
| actin-F | TTCATATTGGTCTATTGAGGTGGC | ||
| actin-R | CGTGCGTGACATTAAGGAGA |
Product size refers to the number after removing primers and ambiguous end positions.
Effects of 400 Gy irradiation of adults on fecundity and egg hatch rates.
| CK♂ + CK♀ | 176 ± 59a | 95.26 ± 3.18a |
| IR♂ + CK♀ | 107 ± 39a | 84.23 ± 5.48a |
| CK♂ + IR♀ | 26 ± 17b | 95.04 ± 2.00a |
Data are means ± S.E.M. Different letters indicate differences compared to control group (t-test, p < 0.05).
Response of adult fecundity and egg hatch rates to different doses of irradiation applied to pupae.
| 0 | 51 ± 19a | 98.90 ± 1.01a | 51 ± 19a | 98.90 ± 1.01a |
| 150 | 54 ± 24a | 0.42 ± 0.21b | 0.06 ± 0.06b | -b |
| 200 | 78 ± 32a | 0.12 ± 0.01b | 0b | -b |
| 250 | 53 ± 33a | 0b | 0b | -b |
Data are means ± SEMs. Different letters within a column indicate differences at P < 0.05.
Figure 1Eclosion rates and flight capablity of flies treated with different doses of irradiation as pupae. * indicates difference at P < 0.05.
Mating competitiveness after irradiation treated on pupae.
| Treated♂ | 31 | 44 | Treated♀ | 28 | 47 |
| CK♂a | 31.8 | 43.2 | CK♀a | 36.9 | 38.1 |
| Chi-square test | χ2 = 0.027, | Chi-square test | χ2 = 2.199, | ||
CK♂.
Figure 2Morphological characteristics of reproductive organs in irradiated and untreated flies observed by optical microscopy. (A) Ovary of an untreated female. (B) Ovary of an irradiated female. The white arrow indicated the location of ovary. (C) Testis of untreated male. (D) Testis of irradiated male. Scale bars = 3 cm.
Figure 3SEM of morphological characteristics of reproductive organs in control and irradiated B. tau. (A) Complete and (B) Intact construction of ovaries of B. tau (×50). (C) Ovary of an untreated female (×200). (D) Ovary of an irradiated female (×200). (E) Testis of an untreated male (×200). (F) Testis of an irradiated male (×200).
Figure 4Full length sequence of the Btau YP gene. Underline: initiation codon, tailing signal, and termination codon, framed: glycosylation site, and dashed area: predicted phosphorylation sites.
Figure 5Relative level of expression of B.tauYP gene after irradiation, determined by qRT-PCR. The mRAN level of β-Actin transcript was used to normalize the expression level of candidate gene. We tested for differences in mRNA expression level by using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Each point represents the mean value ± S.E.M of three independent. Different letters indicate significant differences in the level of expression at p < 0.05. Three biological replicates were performed.