Literature DB >> 29515235

Early myeloma-related death in elderly patients: development of a clinical prognostic score and evaluation of response sustainability role.

Paula Rodríguez-Otero1, María Victoria Mateos2, Joaquín Martínez-López3, Nerea Martín-Calvo4, Miguel-Teodoro Hernández5, Enrique M Ocio2, Laura Rosiñol6, Rafael Martínez7, Ana-Isabel Teruel8, Norma C Gutiérrez2, Joan Bargay9, Enrique Bengoechea10, Yolanda González11, Jaime Pérez de Oteyza12, Mercedes Gironella13, Cristina Encinas14, Jesús Martín15, Carmen Cabrera16, Luis Palomera17, Felipe de Arriba18, María Teresa Cedena3, Bruno Paiva1, Noemí Puig2, Albert Oriol19, Joan Bladé6, Juan José Lahuerta4, Jesús F San Miguel20.   

Abstract

Although survival of elderly myeloma patients has significantly improved there is still a subset of patients who, despite being fit and achieving optimal responses, will die within 2 years of diagnosis due to myeloma progression. The objective of this study was to define a scoring prognostic index to identify this group of patients. We have evaluated the outcome of 490 newly diagnosed elderly myeloma patients included in two Spanish trials (GEM2005-GEM2010). Sixty-eight patients (13.8%) died within 2 years of diagnosis (early deaths) due to myeloma progression. Our study shows that the use of simple scoring model based on 4 widely available markers (elevated LDH, ISS 3, high risk CA or >75 years) can contribute to identify up-front these patients. Moreover, unsustained response (<6 months duration) emerged as one important predictor of early myeloma-related mortality associated with a significant increase in the risk of death related to myeloma progression. The identification of these patients at high risk of early death is relevant for innovative trials aiming to maintain the depth of first response, since many of them will not receive subsequent lines of therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29515235     DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0072-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  4 in total

Review 1.  Expert Panel Consensus Statement for Proper Evaluation of First Relapse in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  M Offidani; M Boccadoro; F Di Raimondo; M T Petrucci; P Tosi; M Cavo
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Approach to the Older Adult With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Roberto Mina; Sara Bringhen; Tanya M Wildes; Sonja Zweegman; Ashley E Rosko
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2019-05-17

3.  A simple score to predict early severe infections in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Cristina Encinas; José-Ángel Hernandez-Rivas; Albert Oriol; Laura Rosiñol; María-Jesús Blanchard; José-María Bellón; Ramón García-Sanz; Javier de la Rubia; Ana López de la Guía; Ana Jímenez-Ubieto; Isidro Jarque; Belén Iñigo; Victoria Dourdil; Felipe de Arriba; Clara Cuéllar Pérez-Ávila; Yolanda Gonzalez; Miguel-Teodoro Hernández; Joan Bargay; Miguel Granell; Paula Rodríguez-Otero; Maialen Silvent; Carmen Cabrera; Rafael Rios; Adrián Alegre; Mercedes Gironella; Marta-Sonia Gonzalez; Anna Sureda; Antonia Sampol; Enrique M Ocio; Isabel Krsnik; Antonio García; Aránzazu García-Mateo; Joan-Alfons Soler; Jesús Martín; José-María Arguiñano; María-Victoria Mateos; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San-Miguel; Juan-José Lahuerta; Joaquín Martínez-López
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.812

Review 4.  SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment of Older, Vulnerable Adults with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Shakira J Grant; Girija Joshi; Brea Lipe
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2021-11-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.