Hao Zhang1,2, Zhong-Li Li1, Xiang-Zheng Su1, Li Ding3, Ji Li1, Heng Zhu2. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Sports Medicine Center, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28 Fu Xing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, P.R. China. 2. Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, No. 27 Tai Ping Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100850, P.R. China. 3. Department of Hematology, General Hospital of Air Forces, PLA, No. 30 Fu Cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.
Abstract
Rabbit mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are important seed cells in regenerative medicine research, particularly in translational research. In the current study, we showed that rabbit subchondral bone is a reliable source of MSCs. First, we harvested subchondral bone (SCB) from the rabbit knee-joint and initiated the MSC culture by cultivating enzyme-treated SCB. Adherent fibroblast-like cells that outgrew from SCB fulfill the common immuno-phenotypic criteria for defining MSCs, but with low contamination of CD45+ hematopoietic cells. Interestingly, differentiated SCB-MSCs expressed osteogenic and chondrogenic markers at significantly higher levels than those in bone marrow cell suspension-derived MSCs (BMS-MSCs) (P<0.05). No differences in the expression of adipogenic markers between SCB-MSC and BMS-MSC (P>0.05) were observed. Moreover, the results of the colony forming unit-fibroblast assay and sphere formation assay demonstrated that the SCB-MSCs had increased self-renewal potential. SCB-MSCs expressed higher levels of the stemness markers Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2 compared to in BMS-MSCs (P<0.05). Furthermore, the results of both the CCK-8-based assay and CFSE dilution assay showed that SCB-MSCs exhibited enhanced proliferative capacity. In addition, SCB-MSCs exhibited higher phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, which is closely related to MSC proliferation. In conclusion, we identified SCB-MSCs as a novel stem cell population that met the requirements of MSCs; the unique properties of SCB-MSC are important for the potential treatment of tissue damage resulting from disease and trauma.
Rabbit mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are important seed cells in regenerative medicine research, particularly in translational research. In the current study, we showed that rabbit subchondral bone is a reliable source of MSCs. First, we harvested subchondral bone (SCB) from the rabbit knee-joint and initiated the MSC culture by cultivating enzyme-treated SCB. Adherent fibroblast-like cells that outgrew from SCB fulfill the common immuno-phenotypic criteria for defining MSCs, but with low contamination of CD45+ hematopoietic cells. Interestingly, differentiated SCB-MSCs expressed osteogenic and chondrogenic markers at significantly higher levels than those in bone marrow cell suspension-derived MSCs (BMS-MSCs) (P<0.05). No differences in the expression of adipogenic markers between SCB-MSC and BMS-MSC (P>0.05) were observed. Moreover, the results of the colony forming unit-fibroblast assay and sphere formation assay demonstrated that the SCB-MSCs had increased self-renewal potential. SCB-MSCs expressed higher levels of the stemness markers Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2 compared to in BMS-MSCs (P<0.05). Furthermore, the results of both the CCK-8-based assay and CFSE dilution assay showed that SCB-MSCs exhibited enhanced proliferative capacity. In addition, SCB-MSCs exhibited higher phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, which is closely related to MSC proliferation. In conclusion, we identified SCB-MSCs as a novel stem cell population that met the requirements of MSCs; the unique properties of SCB-MSC are important for the potential treatment of tissue damage resulting from disease and trauma.
Entities:
Keywords:
bioresource; experimental animals; mesenchymal stem cell; rabbit; subchondral bone
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), also known as multipotent stromal cells, were first
identified in the bone marrow [14]. In postnatal
organisms, loosely woven and highly vascularized bone marrow form a unique niche for stem
cells [14, 31]. Like hematopoietic stem cells, the multi-potency and self-renewal of MSCs are
tightly controlled by the bone marrow microenvironment [8, 31, 36]. According to the requirements of the hosts, MSCs migrate out from connective
tissue of bone marrow and regenerate mesenchymal tissues [25]. Increasing data have shown that MSCs play a role as promising seed cells for
cellular replacement therapy for diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and bone repair [8, 17, 18, 31, 38]. The rabbit is a commonly used experimental animal
for orthopedic application and tissue engineering because of its easy accessibility and
convenient maneuverability. However, MSC-based therapies in rabbit models are limited
because of contamination by hematopoietic cells. Notably, the structure of the MSC niche was
typically destroyed, while rabbit MSCs were routinely cultured in bone marrow cell
suspension [2, 16, 36]. We previously isolated and
characterized MSCs and examined the potential application of these cells [24, 45, 48]. In our previous studies, we found that collagenase
digestion efficiently loosened the tissue microstructure and facilitated MSC outgrowth from
tissues without reducing cell viability. In addition, enzymic treatment induced the release
of hematopoietic cells and made it easier to deplete them [19, 47].Because mesenchymal stem cells were first described in the 1970s, many types of biological
tissue have been developed as stem cell resources [15, 30]. Particularly, adipose tissue is an
optimal source of proliferating, nonimmunogenic, and easily available stem cells [1, 22, 26, 35]. However,
many studies have shown that the sources of origin and microenvironment greatly impact the
differentiation ability of MSCs [26]. Researchers
revealed that adipose tissue-derived MSCs show decreased osteogenic and chondrogenic
differentiation capacity compared to bone marrow-derived MSCs [9, 42]. Therefore, attention should
be given to subchondral bone (SCB), which is accessible in orthopedics surgery and has a
similar microenvironment, to facilitate bone and cartilage injury regeneration.Therefore, we hypothesized that culturing the SCB and allowing MSCs to migrate out from
their stem cell niche may be an efficient strategy for obtaining viable and homogeneous
rabbitMSC populations. We digested SCB and conducted MSC (SCB-MSC) culture using these
cells. Our results showed that SCB-MSCs display enhanced osteo-chondrogenic differentiation,
self-renewal, and proliferation potential compared to bone marrow suspension-derived MSCs
(BMS-MSCs).
Materials and Methods
Isolation and culture of SCB-MSCs
MSCs were isolated from male New Zealand White rabbits (3–4 weeks of age, from the
Laboratory Animal Center of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences of China, Beijing,
China). All experiments in this study were performed in accordance with the Academy of
Military Medical Sciences Guide for Laboratory Animals. To isolate SCB-MSCs, the knee
joints of the rabbit were carefully excised with scissors, and the subchondral bones were
collected using forceps. Subchondral bone fragments were cultured in α-MEM containing 10%
(vol/vol) fetal bovine sum (FBS) (Solarbio, Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) in the presence of 1
mg ml−1(wt/vol) of collagenase II (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C for 20
min. The digestion medium and released cells were discarded, and the enzyme-treated SCBs
were seeded into a plastic culture dish (250 ml) in the presence of α-MEM supplemented
with 10% (vol/vol) FBS. The culture medium was changed on the third day of culture, and
the tissue debris was maintained to allow more MSCs to outgrow. To isolate BMS-MSCs, the
bone marrow was flushed out from the marrow cavity in the tibiae and femurs and
mononuclear cells were isolated from the bone marrow suspensions by routine density
gradient centrifugation. The cells were then seeded on a plastic dish (BD Biosciences,
Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA , 100 × 15 mm), and the MSCs were allowed to adhere for 72 h
before the total volume of the culture medium was changed.
Flow cytometry analysis
SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs were harvested at passages 3–6 by trypsin digestion and stained
individually with phycoerythrin- or fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated monoclonal
antibodies against rabbitCD44, CD45, CD14, CD79a, CD81, or CD90 (BD Biosciences and
Abcam, Cambridge, UK ) for 30 min in the dark at 4°C. After two washes with PBS, the cells
were collected with a FACScan (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed using WinMDI 2.9
software.
Multi-differentiation of MSCs
Multi-differentiation analysis of MSCs was performed as described previously with minor
modifications [19, 47]. Briefly, for osteogenic differentiation, MSCs at passage 3 were seeded into
24-well culture plates (1 ml/well) at a density of 5 × 103
cells/cm2, grown in osteogenic induction medium for 14 days, and subjected to
alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining. The osteogenic induction medium consisted of culture
medium, 0.1 µM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 50
µM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The osteogenic
differentiation of MSCs was assayed by in situ ALP staining with a
commercial kit (Sigma-Aldrich).For adipogenic differentiation, MSCs at passage 3 were seeded into 24-well culture plates
at a density of 1 × 104 cells/cm2, incubated in adipogenic induction
medium for 14 days, and subjected to Oil-Red-O staining. The adipogenic induction medium
consisted of culture medium, 1 µM dexamethasone, 0.2 mM indomethacin, 0.5
mM 3-butyl-L-methylxanthine (IBMX), and 0.01 mg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich). The
accumulation of lipid vacuoles in MSCs was evaluated by in situ Oil-Red-O
staining.For chondrogenic differentiation, 4 × 105 MSCs were centrifuged in
polypropylene tubes to form a pelleted micromass and maintained in chondrogenic induction
medium consisting of α-MEM supplemented with 10−7 M dexamethasone, 1% (vol/vol)
insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite, 50 µM ascorbate-2 phosphate, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, 50 µg/ml (wt/vol) proline, and 20 ng/ml (wt/vol) TGF-β3.
On day 21, the pellets were fixed and sectioned as previously described [47]. The development of chondrocytes and accumulation
of the cartilage matrix were evaluated by toluidine blue staining.
Colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay
The clonogenic potential of MSCs was tested in a colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F)
assay as described previously with minor revisions [11]. Briefly, MSCs at passage 1 were seeded into a 6-well plate (Corning, Inc.,
Corning, NY, USA , 16.8 ml/well) at a density of 1 × 103/well and maintained in
culture medium. To detect the formation of CFU-F, the cultured cells in three replicates
were stained with 3% crystal violet in methanol for 10 min at days 5, 10, and 15. All
visible colonies larger than 5 mm in diameter were counted.
Sphere formation assay
The clonogenic potential of the MSCs was further tested in a sphere formation assay
[20, 31].
MSCs at passage 1 were seeded at 2 × 105/cm2 on an ultra-low
attachment dish (Corning) in α-MEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS. Primary cell
spheres were counted after 3 days in culture, trypsinized, and re-plated. Secondary
spheres were counted on day 6.
CCK8 assay
MSC proliferation assays were performed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo
Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) [41]. Briefly, MSCs
at passage 3 were seeded into 96-well plates (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a
density of 1 × 103 cells/cm2, cultured in α-MEM medium with 10% FBS
(6 wells in each group), added to CCK-8 solution at a ratio of 100
µL/µL, and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Absorbance was
then measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Offenburg,
Germany). In the current study, CCK-8 experiments were performed on days 1, 5, 7, 10, and
13.
CFSE dilution assay
Moreover, the proliferation of SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs was also examined in a CFSE dilution
assay. Briefly, MSCs were suspended at a concentration of 107 cells/ml in PBS
containing 2% FBS. MSCs were incubated in the presence of 10 µM CFSE for
20 min in the dark, followed by blockage of CFSE incorporation by FBS. The cells were then
washed twice before they were re-plated. MSCs were harvested on days 2 and 4. The dye
dilution was assayed with a FACSCalibur instrument and data were analyzed using WinMdi2.8
software.
Cell cycle assay
MSCs were seeded at 5 × 103 cells/cm2 and cultured in α-MEM medium
with 10% FBS. At 80–90% confluence, the MSCs were collected for cell cycle analysis.
Briefly, the MSCs were washed and fixed overnight in 70% ethanol at −20°C in 1.5-ml
microcentrifuge tubes (Biologix, Shandong, China). The fixed cells were then washed and
incubated in 100 µg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20 ng/ml
RNase (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 30 min. Cell cycle analysis was then conducted by flow
cytometry. Independent experiments were replicated at least three times. The cell
subpopulations in the G0/G1 and S phases were calculated by gating analysis based on
differences in DNA content.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
Aliquots of MSCs (2 × 105) at passages 3–6 were seeded in 6-well culture
plates and maintained in osteogenic/adipogenic/chondrogenic induction medium for 7 days
before they were harvested. Total RNA was extracted from MSCs with TRIzol reagent
(Invitrogen) and reverse-transcribed using the mRNA Selective PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga,
Japan). RabbitHPRT, Runx-2, osteopontin
(OPN), CEBP/α, PPARγ, Sox-9,
collagen I, Nanog, OCT4, and
Sox2 cDNA were amplified by real-time PCR using the SYBR Green PCR kit
(Sigma). The primer sequences used for real-time PCR are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Primer sequences
genes
primersequences
Annealing temperature
HPRT
forward
5′-GACCAGTCAACAGGGGACAT-3′
60 °C
reverse
5′-ACACTTCGAGGGGTCCTTTT-3′
Runx2
forward
5′-ATTTCTCACCTCCTCAGCCC-3′
reverse
5′-TCCCAAGTTTCCCTCATCCC-3′
OPN
forward
5′-TTTTGTCTCTTGGGCATGGC-3′
reverse
5′-GCATTCTGCGGTGTTAGGAG-3′
CEBP/α
forward
5′-GGGACGCTAGGTGACAGAAT-3′
reverse
5′-GAAAGGACGCTGGCTGAAAA-3′
PPARγ
forward
5′-TTGCTGTGGGGATGTCTCAT-3′
reverse
5′-TTTCCTGTCAAGATCGCCCT-3′
Sox9
forward
5′-ATGAAGATGACCGACGAGCA-3′
reverse
5′-ACTTGTCCTCTTCGCTCTCC-3′
Collage I
forward
5′-CCAAGGGAGAGCAAGGAGAA-3′
reverse
5′-CCTTTGGGGCCTTCTTTTCC-3′
Nanog
forward
5′-AAAACTCCCGACTCTGCAGA-3′
reverse
5′-AGGCTGGAGAGTTCTTGCAT-3′
4-Oct
forward
5′-CGGAAGAGAAAGCGAACGAG-3′
reverse
5′-TGGCCTCAAAATCCTCTCGT-3′
Sox2
forward
5′-AAGGGAAATGGGGAGAGGTG-3′
reverse
5′-TGGATGGGATTGGTGGTCTC-3′
Western blotting
MSCs at passage 3 and 6 were plated in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 105
cells/cm2 and starved in serum-free α-MEM medium for at least 6 h. Protein
lysis buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was added, and thawed lysates were vortexed and
centrifuged. The proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked
by incubation with 5% wt/vol nonfat dry milk. Membranes were then incubated with anti-ERK,
anti-phospho-ERK, and β-actin (Sigma) Abs at the appropriate dilutions overnight at 4°C.
After incubation, the membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20
(TBST). Secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was added to the membranes
in 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST. The negative control was used as described previously. The
western blotting assay was performed at least 3 times independently, representative
results are shown.
Statistical analysis
The data were expressed as the mean values with the standard deviation. Statistical
significance was analyzed by Student’s t test and two-tailed
P-values were calculated, and P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant. The error bars in all figures represent the standard
deviation.
Results
SCB-MSC exhibit morphological features and surface antigens similar to those of
BMS-MSCs
Forty-eight hours after the primary culture, fibroblast-like cells migrated out from the
digested SCB fragments and adhered to the dish (Fig.
1Aa), whereas a few elongated adhesion cells were observed in the dish in which the
bone marrow cell suspension cells were seeded (Fig.
1Ab). An adherent layer of vortex-shaped cells developed within 6 days (Fig. 1Ac), whereas a culture confluence of only
30–40% was achieved when the nuclear cells were cultivated (Fig. 1Ad). Further, the results of immuno-phenotyping showed that
both SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs were homogenously positive for the mesenchymal markers CD44 and
CD81 but negative for the hematopoietic markers CD14 and CD45 and co-stimulating molecule
CD79α (Fig. 1B). Unlike human MSCs, it remains
controversial whether rabbit MSCs are positive for CD90 [2, 28, 36]. Our results showed that SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs were negative for CD90 (Fig. 1B). In addition, the percentage of CD45+ cells
in the SCB-MSCs (3.31 ± 0.78%) was significantly lower than that in BMS-MSCs (13.93 ±
1.63%) (**P<0.01), demonstrating that a homogeneous cell population
was expanded from the digested subchondral bone (Fig.
1C).
Fig. 1.
Morphologic and immuno-phenotypic features of SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs. A: The
morphologic characteristics of MSCs in two groups. The bar represents 200
µm. B: The immuno-phenotypic features of two groups. Both groups
were homogenously positive for mesenchymal markers but negative for hematopoietic
markers. C: The comparison of CD45+ cells between the SCB-MSC group and BMS-MSC
group (3.31 ± 0.78% vs 13.93 ± 1.63%) (**P<0.01). SCB-MSCs,
subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone marrow suspension-derived MSCs.
Morphologic and immuno-phenotypic features of SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs. A: The
morphologic characteristics of MSCs in two groups. The bar represents 200
µm. B: The immuno-phenotypic features of two groups. Both groups
were homogenously positive for mesenchymal markers but negative for hematopoietic
markers. C: The comparison of CD45+ cells between the SCB-MSC group and BMS-MSC
group (3.31 ± 0.78% vs 13.93 ± 1.63%) (**P<0.01). SCB-MSCs,
subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone marrow suspension-derived MSCs.
SCB-MSCs display enhanced osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation
potential
Although the SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs shared similar morphologic and immuno-phenotypic
features, SCB-MSCs display enhanced differentiation capacity compared to BMS-MSCs.
Analysis of osteogenic differentiation showed higher ALP activity in SCB-MSCs than in
BMS-MSCs after 14 days of induction (Fig. 2A). Additionally, the analysis of chondrogenic differentiation showed that more
SCB-MSCs developed into toluidine blue-positive chondrocytes, indicating that the cells
secreted sulfated proteoglycan at a higher level to form a cartilage extracellular matrix
(Fig. 2A). However, no significant differences
were observed in the accumulation of intracellular Oil-Red-O-stained lipids, indicating
that SCB-MSCs and BMS-MSCs shared a similar adipogenic differentiation capacity (Fig. 2A). Complementing the results of histochemical
analysis, SCB-MSCs after induction exhibited high levels of mRNA expression of osteogenic
markers (Runx-2 and OPN) and chondrogenic markers
(Sox-9 and Collage I) (*P<0.05;
**P<0.01, Fig. 2B). The
mRNA expression of adipogenic transcription factor CEBP/α and
PPARγ in SCB-MSCs was similar to that in BMS-MSCs (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Results of multi-differentiation induction and RT-PCR assay. A: ALP and Oil-Red-O
staining showed higher osteogenic and chondrogenic potential in the SCB-MSC group
after induction. There were no significant differences in adipogenic potential
between the two groups. The bar represents 200 µm. B: Comparison of
mRNA expression levels of osteogenic (Runx-2 and OPN), chondrogenic (Sox-9 and
collagen I) and adipogenic (CEBP/α and PPARγ) markers between the two groups.
SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone marrow suspension-derived
MSCs.
Results of multi-differentiation induction and RT-PCR assay. A: ALP and Oil-Red-O
staining showed higher osteogenic and chondrogenic potential in the SCB-MSC group
after induction. There were no significant differences in adipogenic potential
between the two groups. The bar represents 200 µm. B: Comparison of
mRNA expression levels of osteogenic (Runx-2 and OPN), chondrogenic (Sox-9 and
collagen I) and adipogenic (CEBP/α and PPARγ) markers between the two groups.
SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone marrow suspension-derived
MSCs.
SCB-MSCs display higher self-renewal potential
Functional MSCs were initially identified by their capacity to form clonogenic cell
clusters in vitro, a common feature different to other stromal cell
populations. In the current study, self-renewal potential was measured in a CFU-F assay
and sphere formation assay. As indicated in Figs.
3A and B, the CFU-F frequency remained relatively higher in SCB-MSCs than in BMS-MSCs
(SCB-MSCs versus BMS-MSCs: 6.33 ± 0.94 versus 3 ± 0.82, 11 ± 1.63 versus 5.67 ± 0.94, 17 ±
0.82 versus 10.67 ± 1.25 for days 5, 10, and 15, respectively.
*P<0.05; **P<0.01).
Fig. 3.
CFU-F assay, sphere formation assay, and stemness markers. A, B: CFU-F frequency
remained relatively higher in the SCB-MSC group than in the BMS-MSC group. The bar
represents 1 cm in 3A. SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone
marrow suspension-derived MSCs. C, D: The results of primary and secondary sphere
culture revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The bars represent
100 µm in 3C upper and 200 µm in 3C low,
respectively. E: Comparison of mRNA expression of several stemness markers (Nanog,
OCT4, and Sox-2) between two groups.
CFU-F assay, sphere formation assay, and stemness markers. A, B: CFU-F frequency
remained relatively higher in the SCB-MSC group than in the BMS-MSC group. The bar
represents 1 cm in 3A. SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSCs, bone
marrow suspension-derived MSCs. C, D: The results of primary and secondary sphere
culture revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The bars represent
100 µm in 3C upper and 200 µm in 3C low,
respectively. E: Comparison of mRNA expression of several stemness markers (Nanog,
OCT4, and Sox-2) between two groups.Sphere formation assays have long been used to evaluate progenitor/multipotent cell
populations in epithelial systems. Recent studies suggested that MSCs can also produce
spheres [20, 31]. Three days after culture on ultra-low adherent tissue culture plates,
sphere formation was evident in the SCB-MSC group and BMS-MSC group (Fig. 3C). These spheres were disassociated and re-plated on
non-adherent plates. Fewer spheres developed after another 3 days of culture.
Interestingly, there was a noticeable difference in primary and secondary sphere number in
SCB-MSC culture compared with to in BMS culture (SCB-MSCs versus BMS-MSCs: 38 ± 9.53
versus 22 ± 0.82, 24.67 ± 3.21 versus 10 ± 1.63 for primary spheres and secondary spheres,
respectively. Fig. 3D,
*P<0.05; **P<0.01).The results of the CUF-F and sphere formation assays strongly suggest that SCB-MSCs have
an increased stem cell population that can self-renew. To further explore the cause of
enhanced self-renewal, we next measured the mRNA expression of several stemness markers
(Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2) in SCB-MSCs
[4, 7, 27, 34]. The
data indicated that SCB-MSCs displayed significantly higher transcription levels of
Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2 than in
BMS-MSCs (Fig. 3E, *P<0.05;
**P<0.01).
SCB-MSCs display enhanced proliferative capacity
To investigate the proliferation ability of SCB-MSCs, a CCK-8 assay and CFSE dilution
assay were performed. The results of the CCK-8-based cell proliferation assay (Fig. 4A) showed that SCB-MSCs exerted stronger proliferative effects than BMS-MSCs
(*P<0.05). Consistently, the CFSE data showed that a higher
proportion of SCB-MSCs underwent cell division on days 2 and 4 (Fig. 4B), indicating that these cells had an enhanced proliferation
capacity.
Fig. 4.
SCB-MSCs display enhanced proliferative capacity. A: CCK-8-based cell proliferation
assay indicated that the SCB-MSC group harbors stronger proliferative potential than
the BMS-MSC group (*P<0.05). B: CFSE data on days 2 and 4 showed
that a greater proportion of SCB-MSCs underwent cell division, indicating enhanced
proliferation potential. C: The results of cell cycle analysis showed a higher
percentage of SCB-MSCs (50 ± 1.41%) were in the S phase compared to BMS-MSCs (36.5 ±
3.55%). D: The data showed enhanced Erk1/2 phosphorylation in passages 3 and 6
SCB-MSCs. SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSC, bone marrow
suspension-derived MSCs.
SCB-MSCs display enhanced proliferative capacity. A: CCK-8-based cell proliferation
assay indicated that the SCB-MSC group harbors stronger proliferative potential than
the BMS-MSC group (*P<0.05). B: CFSE data on days 2 and 4 showed
that a greater proportion of SCB-MSCs underwent cell division, indicating enhanced
proliferation potential. C: The results of cell cycle analysis showed a higher
percentage of SCB-MSCs (50 ± 1.41%) were in the S phase compared to BMS-MSCs (36.5 ±
3.55%). D: The data showed enhanced Erk1/2 phosphorylation in passages 3 and 6
SCB-MSCs. SCB-MSCs, subchondral bone-derived MSCs; BMS-MSC, bone marrow
suspension-derived MSCs.Enhanced cell proliferation is also reflected by an increased number of cells in the S
phase and decreased number of cells arrested in the G0/G1 phase. A higher percentage of
SCB-MSCs (50 ± 1.41%) were in S phase compared to BMS-MSCs (36.5 ± 3.55%) (Fig. 4C), indicating that an increased number of
cells proceeded into G2/S phase (*P<0.05).Because ERK-MAPK signaling is involved in controlling cell proliferation [6, 13], we
further examined the phosphorylation of ERK-MAPK in the cells. The data in Fig. 4D shows enhanced Erk1/2 phosphorylation in
passages 3 and 6 SCB-MSCs. The results support that SCB-MSC harbors an enhanced
proliferation capacity.
Discussion
Rabbit MSCs are important seed cells in regenerative medicine research, particularly in
translational research. A variety of healthy tissues have been developed as stem cell
resources, including bone marrow, blood, umbilical cord, placenta, fat, heart, brain, skin,
muscle, liver, gonads, and teeth [37]. Many studies
have shown that the differentiation ability of MSCs varies greatly from different resources.
In the orthopedics field, SCB has received attention in regeneration research [10, 21, 40, 44, 46].To identify MSCs, surface antigen markers were tested. It remains controversial weather
rabbitMSC express CD90 based on previous studies. Tan et al. (2013)
characterized rabbit MSCs and found that they expressed CD90 [36]. Bakhtina (2014) and Lee (2014) compared the surface markers between
human and rabbit MSCs and found rabbit MSCs did not express CD90 [2, 28]. The results of flow
cytometry analysis in the present study showed that rabbit MSCs were CD90-negative, which is
in accordance with the previous reports. The adult bone marrow contains niches that control
the multi-differentiation potential and self-renewal capacity of stem cells [3]. Several studies demonstrated that implanted bone
marrow could support long-term repopulating cells in vivo [5, 39]. Therefore,
maintaining the bone marrow niche in primary culture may be beneficial for MSC properties.
In the present study, we initiated MSC culture using digested rabbit SCBs, which are mainly
composed of adipose tissue and vessel networks.Our results suggest that SCB-MSCs meet the generally accepted criteria, [12] including the fibroblast-like morphology, typical
cell surface profile, and multi-lineage differentiation capacity. It had been widely
accepted that MSCs cultured from different tissues share many common features, but the
differentiation potential vary [9, 26]. In this study, the results showed that SCB-MSCs gain
enhanced osteogenic and chodrogenic differentiation potential that is comparable to that of
BMS-MSCs, which is important for the potential treatment of tissue damage resulting from
disease and trauma.Several factors have been reported to influence MSC self-renewal capacity, including cell
passages, differentiation, and other factors [23,
33, 43]. In
the present study, we demonstrated that SCB-MSCs, when undergoing differentiation into
osteoblasts and chondrocytes, maintain a higher self-renewal capacity. The results of the
CFU-F and sphere forming assays suggest that SCB-MSCs contain more potent cells.
Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2 are crucial
stemness transcription factors, and lower expression of these proteins leads to a deficiency
of self-renewal [4, 7, 27, 34]. Based on the results of the colony formation assay, SCB-MSCs expressed high
levels of Nanog, OCT4, and Sox-2.High proliferation is a fundamental property of MSCs and is important for the potential
treatment of tissue damage resulting from disease and trauma. The CCK-8 assay and CFSE
dilution assay are widely used to analyze the proliferation of stem cells [29, 32]. Because
ERK-MAPK signaling is involved in controlling cell proliferation, phosphorylation of
ERK-MAPK in MSCs was also detected in this present study. The results showed SCB-MSCs grew
at a higher rate than their marrow counterparts. These results demonstrate that the
proliferation of MSCs was improved in SCB culture.There were also many limitations in our study. First, the most widely used MSC resource in
regenerative medicine domain is fat tissue, umbilical cord, and placenta. We only compared
bone marrow-derived MSCs and SCB-derived MSCs in the present study. Second, all tests were
performed in vitro in this study, and an animal joint injury model would be
useful in further studies to explore the differences between different source origin-derived
MSCs in vivo. Third, the mechanism of differentiation and proliferation
potential changes should be evaluate in further studies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our results support that maintaining the bone marrow niche in MSC culture
minimizes the negative impact on cell yield and purity while retaining enhanced
multi-potency, self-renewal, and proliferation potential of MSCs. However, the precise
mechanism regulating the fate of SCB-MSCs requires further investigation. The results also
suggest that SCB is a novel resource for rabbit MSCs and may provide helpful information
for understanding MSC niches.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Authors: Xiao-Huan Ma; Xin Xu; Chang-Yong Zou; Yao Zhao; Zhan-Ju Wang; Hai-Ying Wang; Yu-Fen Wang; Zhen-Bo Hu Journal: Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Date: 2016-12
Authors: Gabriel M Gutierrez; Elizabeth Kong; Yves Sabbagh; Nelson E Brown; Jong-Seo Lee; Marie B Demay; David M Thomas; Philip W Hinds Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gehua Zhen; Chunyi Wen; Xiaofeng Jia; Yu Li; Janet L Crane; Simon C Mears; Frederic B Askin; Frank J Frassica; Weizhong Chang; Jie Yao; John A Carrino; Andrew Cosgarea; Dmitri Artemov; Qianming Chen; Zhihe Zhao; Xuedong Zhou; Lee Riley; Paul Sponseller; Mei Wan; William Weijia Lu; Xu Cao Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-05-19 Impact factor: 53.440