Literature DB >> 29514764

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure assessment in a community exposed to contaminated drinking water, New Hampshire, 2015.

Elizabeth R Daly1, Benjamin P Chan2, Elizabeth A Talbot3, Julianne Nassif2, Christine Bean2, Steffany J Cavallo2, Erin Metcalf2, Karen Simone4, Alan D Woolf5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used in manufacturing that resist environmental degradation, can leach into drinking water, and bioaccumulate in tissues. Some studies have shown associations with negative health outcomes. In May 2014, a New Hampshire public drinking water supply was found to be contaminated with PFAS from a former U.S. Air Force base.
OBJECTIVES: We established a serum testing program to assess PFAS exposure in the affected community.
METHODS: Serum samples and demographic and exposure information were collected from consenting eligible participants. Samples were tested for PFAS at three analytical laboratories. Geometric means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and analyzed by age and exposure variables.
RESULTS: A total of 1578 individuals provided samples for PFAS testing; >94% were found to have perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS) detectable in serum. Geometric mean serum concentrations of PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS were 8.6 μg/L (95% CI:8.3-8.9), 3.1 μg/L (95% CI: 3.0-3.2), and 4.1 μg/L (95% CI: 3.9-4.3), respectively, which were statistically higher than the general U.S. POPULATION: Significant associations were observed between PFAS serum concentrations and age, time spent in the affected community, childcare attendance, and water consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS were found in significantly higher levels in the affected population, consistent with PFAS drinking water contamination. Given increased recognition of PFAS contamination in the U.S, a coordinated national response is needed to improve access to biomonitoring and understand health impacts.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Chemical; Drinking water contamination; PFAS; Perfluoroalkyl substances; Polyfluoroalkyl substances

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29514764     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  17 in total

1.  Sociodemographic and behavioral determinants of serum concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in a community highly exposed to aqueous film-forming foam contaminants in drinking water.

Authors:  Kelsey E Barton; Anne P Starling; Christopher P Higgins; Carrie A McDonough; Antonia M Calafat; John L Adgate
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and maternal and neonatal thyroid function in the Project Viva Cohort: A mixtures approach.

Authors:  Emma V Preston; Thomas F Webster; Birgit Claus Henn; Michael D McClean; Chris Gennings; Emily Oken; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elizabeth N Pearce; Antonia M Calafat; Abby F Fleisch; Sharon K Sagiv
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Pediatric Cancer By Race, Ethnicity and Region in the United States.

Authors:  Judy R Rees; Julie E Weiss; Bruce L Riddle; Karen Craver; Michael Scot Zens; Maria O Celaya; Janet L Peacock
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 4.  The U.S. national biomonitoring network - Enhancing capability and capacity to assess human chemical exposures.

Authors:  Julianne Nassif; Antonia M Calafat; Kenneth M Aldous
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 7.401

5.  Uncovering PFAS and Other Xenobiotics in the Dark Metabolome Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Mass Defect Analysis, and Machine Learning.

Authors:  MaKayla Foster; Markace Rainey; Chandler Watson; James N Dodds; Kaylie I Kirkwood; Facundo M Fernández; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the U.S. general population: Paired serum-urine data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Kayoko Kato; Kendra Hubbard; Tao Jia; Julianne Cook Botelho; Lee-Yang Wong
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Serum Concentrations of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph J Shearer; Catherine L Callahan; Antonia M Calafat; Wen-Yi Huang; Rena R Jones; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Neal D Freedman; Joshua N Sampson; Debra T Silverman; Mark P Purdue; Jonathan N Hofmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Dominant entropic binding of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) to albumin protein revealed by 19F NMR.

Authors:  Michael Fedorenko; Jessica Alesio; Anatoliy Fedorenko; Angela Slitt; Geoffrey D Bothun
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Nicole M DeLuca; Michelle Angrish; Amina Wilkins; Kris Thayer; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 10.  Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Alan Ducatman; Alan Boobis; Jamie C DeWitt; Christopher Lau; Carla Ng; James S Smith; Stephen M Roberts
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.