Erin C Dunn1,2,3,4, Katherine M Crawford1, Thomas W Soare1,2,3, Katherine S Button5, Miriam R Raffeld1, Andrew D A C Smith6, Ian S Penton-Voak7, Marcus R Munafò7,8,9. 1. Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. 4. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK. 6. Applied Statistics Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. 7. School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 8. Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MRC IEU) at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 9. UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emotion recognition skills are essential for social communication. Deficits in these skills have been implicated in mental disorders. Prior studies of clinical and high-risk samples have consistently shown that children exposed to adversity are more likely than their unexposed peers to have emotion recognition skills deficits. However, only one population-based study has examined this association. METHODS: We analyzed data from children participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective birth cohort (n = 6,506). We examined the association between eight adversities, assessed repeatedly from birth to age 8 (caregiver physical or emotional abuse; sexual or physical abuse; maternal psychopathology; one adult in the household; family instability; financial stress; parent legal problems; neighborhood disadvantage) and the ability to recognize facial displays of emotion measured using the faces subtest of the Diagnostic Assessment of Non-Verbal Accuracy (DANVA) at age 8.5 years. In addition to examining the role of exposure (vs. nonexposure) to each type of adversity, we also evaluated the role of the timing, duration, and recency of each adversity using a Least Angle Regression variable selection procedure. RESULTS: Over three-quarters of the sample experienced at least one adversity. We found no evidence to support an association between emotion recognition deficits and previous exposure to adversity, either in terms of total lifetime exposure, timing, duration, or recency, or when stratifying by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the largest population-based sample suggest that even extreme forms of adversity are unrelated to emotion recognition deficits as measured by the DANVA, suggesting the possible immutability of emotion recognition in the general population. These findings emphasize the importance of population-based studies to generate generalizable results.
BACKGROUND: Emotion recognition skills are essential for social communication. Deficits in these skills have been implicated in mental disorders. Prior studies of clinical and high-risk samples have consistently shown that children exposed to adversity are more likely than their unexposed peers to have emotion recognition skills deficits. However, only one population-based study has examined this association. METHODS: We analyzed data from children participating in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective birth cohort (n = 6,506). We examined the association between eight adversities, assessed repeatedly from birth to age 8 (caregiver physical or emotional abuse; sexual or physical abuse; maternal psychopathology; one adult in the household; family instability; financial stress; parent legal problems; neighborhood disadvantage) and the ability to recognize facial displays of emotion measured using the faces subtest of the Diagnostic Assessment of Non-Verbal Accuracy (DANVA) at age 8.5 years. In addition to examining the role of exposure (vs. nonexposure) to each type of adversity, we also evaluated the role of the timing, duration, and recency of each adversity using a Least Angle Regression variable selection procedure. RESULTS: Over three-quarters of the sample experienced at least one adversity. We found no evidence to support an association between emotion recognition deficits and previous exposure to adversity, either in terms of total lifetime exposure, timing, duration, or recency, or when stratifying by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the largest population-based sample suggest that even extreme forms of adversity are unrelated to emotion recognition deficits as measured by the DANVA, suggesting the possible immutability of emotion recognition in the general population. These findings emphasize the importance of population-based studies to generate generalizable results.
Authors: Christian G Kohler; Travis H Turner; Warren B Bilker; Colleen M Brensinger; Steven J Siegel; Stephen J Kanes; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Yiwen Zhu; Andrew J Simpkin; Matthew J Suderman; Alexandre A Lussier; Esther Walton; Erin C Dunn; Andrew D A C Smith Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Maciej Kopera; Elisa M Trucco; Andrzej Jakubczyk; Hubert Suszek; Paweł Kobyliński; Marcin Wojnar; Robert A Zucker Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2020 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Rebecca V Mountain; Yiwen Zhu; Olivia R Pickett; Alexandre A Lussier; Jill M Goldstein; Joshua L Roffman; Felicitas B Bidlack; Erin C Dunn Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01