Maie Bachmann1, Laura Päeske2, Kaia Kalev2, Katrin Aarma2, Andres Lehtmets3, Pille Ööpik4, Jaanus Lass2, Hiie Hinrikus2. 1. Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, Tallinn 19086, Estonia. Electronic address: maie@cb.ttu.ee. 2. Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, Tallinn 19086, Estonia. 3. Psychiatric Centre, West Tallinn Central Hospital, Paldiski mnt 68, Tallinn 10617, Estonia. 4. Ädala Family Medicine Center, Madara tn 29, Tallinn 10612, Estonia; Department of Family Medicine, University of Tartu, Ülikooli 18, Tartu 50090, Estonia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorder is one of the leading causes of burden of disease today and it is presumed to take the first place in the world in 2030. Early detection of depression requires a patient-friendly inexpensive method based on easily measurable objective indicators. This study aims to compare various single-channel electroencephalographic (EEG) measures in application for detection of depression. METHODS: The EEG recordings were performed on a group of 13 medication-free depressive outpatients and 13 gender and age matched controls. The recorded 30-channel EEG signal was analysed using linear methods spectral asymmetry index, alpha power variability and relative gamma power and nonlinear methods Higuchi's fractal dimension, detrended fluctuation analysis and Lempel-Ziv complexity. Classification accuracy between depressive and control subjects was calculated using logistic regression analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation. Calculations were performed separately for each EEG channel. RESULTS: All calculated measures indicated increase with depression. Maximal testing accuracy using a single measure was 81% for linear and 77% for nonlinear measures. Combination of two linear measures provides the accuracy of 88% and two nonlinear measures of 85%. Maximal classification accuracy of 92% was indicated using mixed combination of three linear and three nonlinear measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary study confirm that single-channel EEG analysis, employing the combination of measures, can provide discrimination of depression at the level of multichannel EEG analysis. The performed study shows that there is no single superior measure for detection of depression.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Depressive disorder is one of the leading causes of burden of disease today and it is presumed to take the first place in the world in 2030. Early detection of depression requires a patient-friendly inexpensive method based on easily measurable objective indicators. This study aims to compare various single-channel electroencephalographic (EEG) measures in application for detection of depression. METHODS: The EEG recordings were performed on a group of 13 medication-free depressive outpatients and 13 gender and age matched controls. The recorded 30-channel EEG signal was analysed using linear methods spectral asymmetry index, alpha power variability and relative gamma power and nonlinear methods Higuchi's fractal dimension, detrended fluctuation analysis and Lempel-Ziv complexity. Classification accuracy between depressive and control subjects was calculated using logistic regression analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation. Calculations were performed separately for each EEG channel. RESULTS: All calculated measures indicated increase with depression. Maximal testing accuracy using a single measure was 81% for linear and 77% for nonlinear measures. Combination of two linear measures provides the accuracy of 88% and two nonlinear measures of 85%. Maximal classification accuracy of 92% was indicated using mixed combination of three linear and three nonlinear measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary study confirm that single-channel EEG analysis, employing the combination of measures, can provide discrimination of depression at the level of multichannel EEG analysis. The performed study shows that there is no single superior measure for detection of depression.
Authors: Josef Faller; Jayce Doose; Xiaoxiao Sun; James R Mclntosh; Golbarg T Saber; Yida Lin; Joshua B Teves; Aidan Blankenship; Sarah Huffman; Robin I Goldman; Mark S George; Truman R Brown; Paul Sajda Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2022-02-26 Impact factor: 8.955