Literature DB >> 29512261

Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients.

Brian K P Goh1,2, Lip-Seng Lee3, Ser-Yee Lee1,2, Pierce K H Chow1,2, Chung-Yip Chan1,2, Adrian K H Chiow3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presently, the adoption of laparoscopic hepatectomy is rapidly increasingly worldwide. However, the application of robotic hepatectomy (RH) remains limited and its role remains undefined today.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 43 consecutive patients who underwent RH at two institutions in the Singapore Health Services Group.
RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive patients underwent 48 resections during the study period. Seven (16.3%) patients underwent major resections and seven (16.3%) underwent right posterior sectionectomies. Nineteen (44.2%) patients had tumours located in the difficult posterosuperior segments, five had multiple resections and three underwent repeat resections for recurrent tumours. RH was performed for malignant tumours in 32 (74%) patients and 16 (37.2%) had cirrhosis. Seven RH was performed with other concomitant procedures including three colectomies, three hilar lymphadenectomies and one portal vein ligation. The median operation time was 360 min (range 75-825) and the median blood loss was 300 mL (range 25-4500). There was one (2.3%) open conversion for bleeding. The median post-operative stay was 4 days (range 2-33) and there was one (2.3%) readmission. There was one (2.3%) major (>grade 2 morbidity) in a patient with concomitant anterior resection who underwent reoperation for anastomotic leak. There was no 90 day/in-hospital mortality. Comparison between RH for tumours in the anterolateral segments versus posterosuperior segments demonstrated no significant difference in perioperative outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Our initial experience demonstrated that RH is safe, feasible and associated with excellent post-operative outcomes. It can be performed successfully with low morbidity even for complex resections such as major hepatectomies, posterior sectionectomies, tumours in difficult posterosuperior segments and repeat liver resections.
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic hepatectomy; laparoscopic liver resection; minimally invasive hepatectomy; robotic hepatectomy; robotic liver resection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29512261     DOI: 10.1111/ans.14417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  8 in total

1.  International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

Authors:  Adrian K H Chiow; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas Syn; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Rong Liu; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung-Yip Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Minimally invasive liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) tumors: an international multicenter matched cohort study with regression discontinuity analyses.

Authors:  Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Mikhail Efanov; Rong Liu; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas L Syn; Charing C Chong; Iswanto Sucandy; Adrian K H Chiow; Marco V Marino; Mikel Gastaca; Jae Hoon Lee; T Peter Kingham; Mathieu D'Hondt; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Ho-Seong Han; Chung Ngai Tang; Johann Pratschke; Roberto I Troisi; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Critical Appraisal of the Impact of the Systematic Adoption of Advanced Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery on the Surgical Management of Mirizzi Syndrome.

Authors:  Ye-Xin Koh; Pallavi Basu; Yi-Xin Liew; Jin-Yao Teo; Juinn-Huar Kam; Ser-Yee Lee; Peng-Chung Cheow; Premaraj Jeyaraj; Pierce K H Chow; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P J Ooi; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Ser-Yee Lee; Jin-Yao Teo; Juinn-Huar Kam; Prema-Raj Jeyaraj; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Novel method of intraoperative liver tumour localisation with indocyanine green and near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Hui Jun Lim; Adrian Kah Heng Chiow; Lip Seng Lee; Siong San Tan; Brian Kp Goh; Ye Xin Koh; Chung Yip Chan; Ser Yee Lee
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Outcome of minimally invasive liver resection for extrapancreatic biliary malignancies: A single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Ken Min Chin; Darren W Q Chua; Ser Yee Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience.

Authors:  Manuel Durán; Javier Briceño; Ana Padial; Ferdinando Massimiliano Anelli; Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo; María Dolores Ayllón; Rafael Calleja-Lozano; Carmen García-Gaitan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

8.  Robotic vs. laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center analysis of 600 consecutive patients in 6 years.

Authors:  Moritz Schmelzle; Linda Feldbrügge; Santiago Andres Ortiz Galindo; Simon Moosburner; Anika Kästner; Felix Krenzien; Christian Benzing; Matthias Biebl; Robert Öllinger; Thomas Malinka; Wenzel Schöning; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.