| Literature DB >> 29511932 |
Fang Li1,2, Chun-Feng Liu1,2,3, Yin-Zhen Xu1,2, Yi-Lin Guo4, Shu-Wen Xue4, Xiang-Dong Kong4, Hai-Bing Zhang1,2, Yan Zhang1,2, Jian-Sheng Kang5,6,7.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 29511932 PMCID: PMC6321817 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-018-0519-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Cell ISSN: 1674-800X Impact factor: 14.870
Figure 1Mice lacking are lethal in postnatal 12 h. (A) P0 littermates. Representative Stx-t−/− mouse (Homo) on left, and wild-type mouse (WT) on right. Stx-t−/− pup exhibits small size and stiff body compared to Stx-t+/+ littermate. (B) Scatterplots with boxplots show that Stx-t−/− pups (Homo) have decreased weights (in g, mean ± s.d., t test) compared to wild-types (WT) or heterozygotes (Heter) both at E18.5 (Homo, n = 16, 0.95 ± 0.08; Heter, n = 27, 1.16 ± 0.07, P = 4.3 × 10−10; WT, n = 13, 1.17 ± 0.12, P = 5.7 × 10−6) and P0 (Homo, n = 17, 0.99 ± 0.14; Heter, n = 32, 1.35 ± 0.12, P = 5.3 × 10; WT, n = 22, 1.36 ± 0.15, P = 1.4 × 10). (C) Immunoblot analysis of STX-T. Protein samples prepared from P0 mice are blotted with antibodies against STX-T (top panel) or loading control tubulin (bottom panel). (D) The genotypic distribution of heterozygous offspring. Data are collected at embryonic and postnatal stages. Note that the genotypic distribution of wild-type (WT), heterozygous (Heter) and homozygous (Homo) littermates are analyzed and comparable to the expected numbers based on 1:2:1 ratio of Mendelian inheritance at embryonic (P = 0.19, χ2) and P0 stages (P = 2.1 × 10, χ2). Moreover, none of Stx-t−/− homozygous pups (*, n = 43) can survive beyond postnatal 12 h. (E and F) Blood smears of wild-types (WT) and Stx-t−/− mice, respectively. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (G) Haematological indices and statistic results of wild-types (WT), Stx-t+/− heterozygotes (Heter) and Stx-t−/− homozygous mice (Homo). Abbreviations: RBC, red blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. Data represent mean ± SD
Figure 2Fast recycling deficiency of transferrin receptor in MEF. (A) Colocalization of STX-T (red, RFP tagged) with TFR (green, GFP tagged) in double transfected MEFs cell. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Live chasing of TF-Alexa 546 in MEFs of wild-types (WT, black, n = 40) and homozygotes (Homo, red, n = 43) shows deficiency of transferrin receptor recycling in Stx-t−/− MEF. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. (C) Transferrin receptor recycling in Stx-t−/− MEF (KO, n = 15) is normal compared to wild-types (WT, n = 13) for long time (60 min) chasing. (D and E) show EEA and TF-Alexa 546 in wild-type MEF (WT) and Stx-t−/− MEF (Homo), respectively. The scale bars represent 5 μm. (F and G) Show that Alexa 546-labelled transferrin (TF, red) in Stx-t−/− MEF (KO, n = 18) has normal colocalization coefficience (F, P = 0.44, t test, WT, n = 17) with early endosome marker (EEA, green), and comparable intensity distribution of intracellular TF-Alexa 546 (G, P = 0.50, t test, KO, n = 15) with wild-types (WT, n = 15)