Literature DB >> 29511855

Shifting stream planform state decreases stream productivity yet increases riparian animal production.

Michael P Venarsky1,2,3, David M Walters4, Robert O Hall5,6, Bridget Livers7, Ellen Wohl7.   

Abstract

In the Colorado Front Range (USA), disturbance history dictates stream planform. Undisturbed, old-growth streams have multiple channels and large amounts of wood and depositional habitat. Disturbed streams (wildfires and logging < 200 years ago) are single-channeled with mostly erosional habitat. We tested how these opposing stream states influenced organic matter, benthic macroinvertebrate secondary production, emerging aquatic insect flux, and riparian spider biomass. Organic matter and macroinvertebrate production did not differ among sites per unit area (m-2), but values were 2 ×-21 × higher in undisturbed reaches per unit of stream valley (m-1 valley) because total stream area was higher in undisturbed reaches. Insect emergence was similar among streams at the per unit area and per unit of stream valley. However, rescaling insect emergence to per meter of stream bank showed that the emerging insect biomass reaching the stream bank was lower in undisturbed sites because multi-channel reaches had 3 × more stream bank than single-channel reaches. Riparian spider biomass followed the same pattern as emerging aquatic insects, and we attribute this to bottom-up limitation caused by the multi-channeled undisturbed sites diluting prey quantity (emerging insects) reaching the stream bank (riparian spider habitat). These results show that historic landscape disturbances continue to influence stream and riparian communities in the Colorado Front Range. However, these legacy effects are only weakly influencing habitat-specific function and instead are primarily influencing stream-riparian community productivity by dictating both stream planform (total stream area, total stream bank length) and the proportional distribution of specific habitat types (pools vs riffles).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disturbance; Ecosystem size; Fluvial geomorphology; Legacy effect; Subsidy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511855     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services.

Authors:  Bernard W Sweeney; Thomas L Bott; John K Jackson; Louis A Kaplan; J Denis Newbold; Laurel J Standley; W Cully Hession; Richard J Horwitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Resource subsidies between stream and terrestrial ecosystems under global change.

Authors:  Stefano Larsen; Jeffrey D Muehlbauer; Eugenia Marti
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 10.863

Review 3.  Food chains in freshwaters.

Authors:  John L Sabo; Jacques C Finlay; David M Post
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification.

Authors:  Tom Andersen; Jacob Carstensen; Emilio Hernández-García; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems.

Authors:  Claudio Gratton; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Mechanisms of carbon storage in mountainous headwater rivers.

Authors:  Ellen Wohl; Kathleen Dwire; Nicholas Sutfin; Lina Polvi; Roberto Bazan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Cross-ecosystem impacts of stream pollution reduce resource and contaminant flux to riparian food webs.

Authors:  Johanna M Kraus; Travis S Schmidt; David M Walters; Richard B Wanty; Robert E Zuellig; Ruth E Wolf
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  How wide is a stream? Spatial extent of the potential "stream signature" in terrestrial food webs using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Muehlbauer; Scott F Collins; Martin W Doyle; Klement Tockner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Carbon and nitrogen transfer from a desert stream to riparian predators.

Authors:  D M Sanzone; J L Meyer; E Marti; E P Gardiner; J L Tank; N B Grimm
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The land-cover cascade: relationships coupling land and water.

Authors:  C L Burcher; H M Valett; E F Benfield
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.