Literature DB >> 29511579

Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and robotic pelvic lymph node dissection via a perineal approach: The Tugcu Bakirkoy Technique.

Volkan Tuğcu1, Oktay Akça2, Abdulmuttalip Şimşek1, İsmail Yiğitbaşı1, Mustafa Gürkan Yenice1, Selçuk Şahin1, Ali İhsan Taşcı1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe The Tugcu Bakirkoy robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection technique, and present the results of seven patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed seven robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection operation using Da Vinci Xi HD Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA) on single Gel-port platform. The operation is completed in 4 stages: stage 1 open perineal dissection and gel port placement, stage 2 robotic perineal radical prostatectomy, stage 3 robotic pelvic lymph node dissection, stage 4 vesico-urethral anastomosis. In addition to describing the operation technique step by step, we aimed to present the perioperative and postoperative findings of the seven patients who underwent The Tugcu Bakirkoy Technique.
RESULTS: All operations were successfully completed without any complications in fully the robotic procedure by a single surgeon. Demographic data of the patients were as follows: Mean age (62.1±8 years), mean body mass index (28.2±0.7 kg/m2), mean prostate specific antigen value (10.7±3 ng/mL), and mean prostate volume (64.2±15.3 cc). Mean operative time (184.1±20.2 mins), blood loss (64.2±15.3 cc), hospitalization time (2.1±0.6 days), and time to withdrawal of the urethral catheter (7.8±0.8 days) were also estimated. According to the pathology results, lymph node metastasis was detected in 3 patients while the surgical margin was positive in one.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated for the first time that a new The Tugcu Bakirkoy robotic perineal radical prostatectomy technique which was previously tested in a cadaveric model, can be safely applied for the first time in vivo, and presented our results. On the basis of this, for problems that can not be overcome by traditional methods, this method is a good alternative as a way out. In this regard, it is necessary to carry out advanced studies so that this method can be applied to daily practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dissection; lymph; node; perineal; prostatectomy; robotic

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511579      PMCID: PMC5832371          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.24603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  7 in total

1.  Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Alessandro Larcher; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Massimo Freschi; Andrea Salonia; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Perineal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in the cadaver model.

Authors:  Humberto Laydner; Oktay Akça; Riccardo Autorino; Remi Eyraud; Homayoun Zargar; Luis Felipe Brandao; Ali Khalifeh; Kamol Panumatrassamee; Jean-Alexandre Long; Wahib Isac; Robert J Stein; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastiano Cimino; Giulio Reale; Tommaso Castelli; Vincenzo Favilla; Raimondo Giardina; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Salvatore Privitera; Giuseppe Morgia
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 1.612

4.  Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using a purpose-built single-port robotic platform.

Authors:  Daniel Ramirez; Matthew J Maurice; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Descriptive Technique and Initial Results for Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Oktay Akca; Homayoun Zargar; Peter Caputo; Daniel Ramirez; Hiury Andrade; Selami Albayrak; Humberto Laydner; Kenneth Angermeier
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 2.  Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Lai; Ryan W Dobbs; Susan Talamini; Whitney R Halgrimson; Jessica O Wilson; Hari T Vigneswaran; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.