| Literature DB >> 29511393 |
Andrew J Clayton1, Cecile M E Charbonneau2, Wing C Tsoi2, Peter J Siderfin1, Stuart J C Irvine1.
Abstract
Thin film tin sulphide (SnS) films were produced with grain sizes greater than 1 μm using a one-step metal organic chemical vapour deposition process. Tin-doped indium oxide (ITO) was used as the substrate, having a similar work function to molybdenum typically used as the back contact, but with potential use of its transparency for bifacial illumination. Tetraethyltin and ditertiarybutylsulphide were used as precursors with process temperatures 430-470 °C to promote film growth with large grains. The film stoichiometry was controlled by varying the precursor partial pressure ratios and characterised with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to optimise the SnS composition. X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy were used to determine the phases that were present in the film and revealed that small amounts of ottemannite Sn2S3 was present when SnS was deposited on to the ITO using optimised growth parameters. Interaction at the SnS/ITO interface to form Sn2S3 was deduced to have resulted for all growth conditions.Entities:
Keywords: 209 Solar cell / Photovoltaics; 306 Thin film / Coatings; 50 Energy Materials; 500 Characterization; Thin film SnS; metal organic chemical vapour deposition; photovoltaics
Year: 2018 PMID: 29511393 PMCID: PMC5827783 DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2018.1428478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Figure 1.SEM images of film deposited using optimised growth parameters at different growth temperatures: (a) 432 °C; (b) 472 °C.
Figure 2.Sn-S phase diagram taken from Ref. [17].
Atomic weight (at. %) composition determined by EDX for films deposited using different S/Sn precursor partial pressure ratios, [S/Sn]i.
| Sample | ToC | DtBS (atm) | TET (atm) | [S/Sn]i | S at.% | Sn at.% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS131 | 472 ± 1 | 2.91 × 10−3 | 7.20 × 10−4 | 4.0 | 43.1 | 56.9 |
| TS130 | 472 ± 1 | 3.26 × 10−3 | 6.56 × 10−4 | 5.0 | 47.6 | 52.4 |
| TS117 | 465 ± 1 | 3.40 × 10−3 | 6.30 × 10−4 | 5.4 | 49.7 | 50.3 |
| TS124 | 472 ± 1 | 3.65 × 10−3 | 5.85 × 10−4 | 6.2 | 50.6 | 49.3 |
| TS129 | 473 ± 3 | 3.83 × 10−3 | 5.50 × 10−4 | 7.0 | 51.4 | 48.6 |
| TS118 | 469 ± 1 | 4.05 × 10−3 | 5.09 × 10−4 | 8.0 | 52.5 | 47.5 |
Figure 3.Absorption spectra of films deposited at different [S/Sn]i at a growth temperature of 470 °C.
Figure 4.Band gap calculation of films deposited at different [S/Sn]i using absorption coefficient × energy squared versus energy, (αE)2 vs. E, for direct () transitions and the square route of absorption coefficient × energy versus energy, (αE)1/2 vs. E, for indirect () transitions (inset).
Figure 5.XRD of films deposited at 470 °C using different [S/Sn]i equal to 5.4, 6.2 and 8.0, which showed cross-over of SnS 1:1 stoichiometry determined from EDX measurements.
Figure 6.Raman spectroscopy of different film regions for SnS samples deposited at optimised growth parameters on (a) ITO mapped at a 304 cm−1 frequency and (b) Mo mapped at a 193 cm−1 frequency.