Takako Miyazaki1, Masaaki Yamagishi2, Yoshinobu Maeda1, Satoshi Taniguchi1, Shuhei Fujita1, Hisayuki Hongu1, Hitoshi Yaku3. 1. Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Medical Center, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 2. Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Medical Center, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: myama@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Various types of conduits are available for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction. We have developed an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) conduit with bulging sinuses and a fan-shaped ePTFE valve. This study summarized the results of a multicenter study evaluating the valved ePTFE conduit. METHODS: The valve functions of 902 patients (median age, 3.9 years; median weight, 12.6 kg) who underwent RVOT reconstruction using valved ePTFE conduits (9 different sizes, 8-24 mm in diameter) at 65 hospitals between 2001 and 2015 were retrospectively investigated. Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. The valve functions were assessed using echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: There were no deaths related to the ePTFE conduit. The peak RVOT gradient was 16.5 ± 13.1 mm Hg, and pulmonary insufficiency graded better than mild was 95.9% at the latest follow-up. Conduit replacement was performed in 55 patients, and in only 3 patients because of conduit infection. Freedom from intervention at 5 years and 10 years was 92.3% and 76.1%, respectively, with small conduits (8-16 mm in diameter) and 99.6% and 95.1%, respectively, with large conduits (18-24 mm in diameter). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes of the ePTFE conduit with a fan-shaped valve and bulging sinuses appear clinically satisfactory. We believe that the longevity of small-sized conduits can yield sufficient time to exchange them to larger-sized conduits without any loss of their valve functions. Regarding longevity and resistance to infections, this ePTFE valved conduit can be one of the best ways to reconstruct the RVOT.
OBJECTIVE: Various types of conduits are available for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction. We have developed an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) conduit with bulging sinuses and a fan-shaped ePTFE valve. This study summarized the results of a multicenter study evaluating the valved ePTFE conduit. METHODS: The valve functions of 902 patients (median age, 3.9 years; median weight, 12.6 kg) who underwent RVOT reconstruction using valved ePTFE conduits (9 different sizes, 8-24 mm in diameter) at 65 hospitals between 2001 and 2015 were retrospectively investigated. Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. The valve functions were assessed using echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: There were no deaths related to the ePTFE conduit. The peak RVOT gradient was 16.5 ± 13.1 mm Hg, and pulmonary insufficiency graded better than mild was 95.9% at the latest follow-up. Conduit replacement was performed in 55 patients, and in only 3 patients because of conduit infection. Freedom from intervention at 5 years and 10 years was 92.3% and 76.1%, respectively, with small conduits (8-16 mm in diameter) and 99.6% and 95.1%, respectively, with large conduits (18-24 mm in diameter). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes of the ePTFE conduit with a fan-shaped valve and bulging sinuses appear clinically satisfactory. We believe that the longevity of small-sized conduits can yield sufficient time to exchange them to larger-sized conduits without any loss of their valve functions. Regarding longevity and resistance to infections, this ePTFE valved conduit can be one of the best ways to reconstruct the RVOT.
Authors: Sophie C Hofferberth; Mossab Y Saeed; Lara Tomholt; Matheus C Fernandes; Christopher J Payne; Karl Price; Gerald R Marx; Jesse J Esch; David W Brown; Jonathan Brown; Peter E Hammer; Richard W Bianco; James C Weaver; Elazer R Edelman; Pedro J Del Nido Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 17.956