Antoinette Percy-Laurry1, Sean F Altekruse2, Mian B Hossain3, Anne Marie O'Keefe3, Norman J Johnson4, Farin Kamangar3. 1. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA. Electronic address: percyL@maiL.nih.gov. 2. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA. 3. Morgan State University, School of Community Health and Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer affects black men disproportionately. Black men have an increased incidence of prostate cancer diagnoses at earlier ages and higher grade as indicated by Gleason score, compared to other races. This study investigates the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on prostate cancer tumor grade among black men. METHODS: Black men with a prostate cancer diagnosis during 1973-2011 were examined using individual-level data from the SEER NLMS database. Logistic regression model estimated the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of high versus low grade prostate cancer based on self-reported SES status at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Men who completed high school only were statistically significantly more likely to have a higher prostate cancer grade than those with a bachelor's degree or higher. However, there was no dose-response effect across educational strata. Retirees were 30% less likely to have higher grade tumors compared to those who were employed. CONCLUSIONS: SES differences among black men did not fully explain the high grade of prostate cancer. Further research is needed on the biology of the disease and to assess access to medical care and prostate health education, discrimination, stress exposures, and social norms that might contribute to the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among black men. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer affects black men disproportionately. Black men have an increased incidence of prostate cancer diagnoses at earlier ages and higher grade as indicated by Gleason score, compared to other races. This study investigates the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on prostate cancer tumor grade among black men. METHODS: Black men with a prostate cancer diagnosis during 1973-2011 were examined using individual-level data from the SEER NLMS database. Logistic regression model estimated the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of high versus low grade prostate cancer based on self-reported SES status at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS:Men who completed high school only were statistically significantly more likely to have a higher prostate cancer grade than those with a bachelor's degree or higher. However, there was no dose-response effect across educational strata. Retirees were 30% less likely to have higher grade tumors compared to those who were employed. CONCLUSIONS: SES differences among black men did not fully explain the high grade of prostate cancer. Further research is needed on the biology of the disease and to assess access to medical care and prostate health education, discrimination, stress exposures, and social norms that might contribute to the aggressiveness of prostate cancer among black men. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Irina Mordukhovich; Paul L Reiter; Danielle M Backes; Leila Family; Lauren E McCullough; Katie M O'Brien; Hilda Razzaghi; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Graciela Mentz; Laurie Lachance; Jonetta Johnson; Causandra Gaines; Barbara A Israel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Elizabeth A Jacobs; Italia Rolle; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Eric E Whitaker; Richard B Warnecke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R M Hoffman; F D Gilliland; J W Eley; L C Harlan; R A Stephenson; J L Stanford; P C Albertson; A S Hamilton; W C Hunt; A L Potosky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-03-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Tia M McGill; Shannon R Self-Brown; Betty S Lai; Melissa Cowart-Osborne; Ashwini Tiwari; Monique Leblanc; Mary Lou Kelley Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2014-02-07
Authors: Stephanie Navarro; Xiaohui Hu; Aaron Mejia; Carol Y Ochoa; Trevor A Pickering; Leslie Ballas; Albert J Farias Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 2.506